Search

Search bills, members, committees and pages...

H.R. 2700

U.S. HouseIn House Committee

Summary

H.R. 2700, the UNPLUGGED Act of 2025, was introduced in the House on Apr 7, 2025 by Rep. Eugene Vindman (D) with 2 co-sponsors. It was referred to Education and Workforce, and last saw action on Apr 7, 2025: Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.


Record

Text

H.R. 2700 has 2 co-sponsors.

hb2700/introduced-in-house.txt
119 HR 2700 IH: Utilize No Phones in Learning to Unleash Growth in Grades and Educate Distraction-free Act of 2025
U.S. House of Representatives
2025-04-07
text/xml
EN
Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.
I 119th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 2700 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES April 7, 2025 Mr. Vindman introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and Workforce A BILL
To require State educational agencies to implement policies prohibiting the use or possession of personal mobile phones by students in public school classrooms during school hours, and for other purposes.
1.
Short title
This Act may be cited as the Utilize No Phones in Learning to Unleash Growth in Grades and Educate Distraction-free Act of 2025 or the UNPLUGGED Act of 2025 .
2.
Findings; sense of Congress
(a)
Findings
Congress finds the following:
(1)
Public education is critical to the economic vitality, national security, and democratic governance of the United States.
(2)
Disruptions to the educational process directly affect national productivity, civic engagement, and workforce development.
(3)
The excessive use of mobile phones during school hours significantly impairs the ability of schools to maintain effective educational environments.
(4)
A growing body of peer-reviewed literature has documented the detrimental effects of mobile phone usage in classrooms on attention, academic performance, and mental health.
(5)
Studies published in journals such as Computers in Human Behavior, Educational Psychology, and the Journal of Adolescent Health have shown that the presence of mobile phones in academic settings correlates with reduced focus, lower test scores, increased academic procrastination, and higher levels of anxiety and depression among students.
(6)
Social psychologist Jonathan Haidt, in both his academic work and public commentary, has—
(A)
extensively documented the relationship between the rise of smartphone use among adolescents and the decline in mental health indicators;
(B)
produced research pointing to a sharp increase in rates of anxiety, depression, and self-harm beginning around 2012–2013, coinciding with widespread smartphone and social media adoption among teenagers; and
(C)
argued that overexposure to digital devices and online platforms undermines the development of resilience, emotional regulation, and in-person social connection.
(7)
Limiting in-school phone access is essential to reversing harmful psychological and academic trends in American youth.
(8)
The presence of mobile phones in educational settings contributes to increased rates of bullying, cyber harassment, academic dishonesty, and classroom distractions, thereby undermining the core mission of public education.
(9)
These issues are not confined to a single state or region and are national in scope, with similar patterns of disruption and diminished student outcomes reported across state lines.
(10)
The cumulative effect of diminished educational achievement has a substantial impact on the national economy and workforce preparedness.
(b)
Sense of Congress
It is the sense of Congress that each State educational agency, in coordination with each local educational agency served by the State educational agency and in consultation with educators, parents, and students, should establish and enforce a policy that—
(1)
enables parents to notify students through school officials about forgotten items, changes in pick-up times, and other common issues; and
(2)
enables schools to communicate with parents regarding time-sensitive items.
3.
Prohibition of student phone possession in schools
(a)
In general
Not later than the first school year beginning after the date of enactment of this Act, each State educational agency, in coordination with each local educational agency served by the State educational agency and in consultation with educators, parents, and students, shall establish and enforce a policy that prohibits student possession or use of personal electronic devices, including personal mobile phones, in public schools during school hours.
(b)
Secure storage methods
A personal electronic device policy established pursuant to subsection (a) may include a requirement that public schools use secure storage methods, including—
(1)
lockable lockers;
(2)
secure lock boxes;
(3)
magnetic pouches or other signal-blocking storage devices; or
(4)
other technologies or materials deemed appropriate by the State educational agency.
(c)
Exceptions
A personal electronic device policy established pursuant to subsection (a) may permit exceptions for—
(1)
students with medical or health conditions that require the use of a mobile phone or other personal electronic device as part of a treatment or monitoring plan, as certified by a licensed healthcare provider;
(2)
students with disabilities or special needs for whom access to a personal mobile phone or other personal electronic device is—
(A)
documented as necessary in an individualized education program; or
(B)
included as part of services or accommodations provided to the student pursuant to section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 ( 29 U.S.C. 794 ) (commonly referred to as a Section 504 plan );
(3)
on an individualized basis for students—
(A)
who are English learners;
(B)
who have a demonstrated need for a personal electronic device to facilitate instruction; and
(C)
acquire documentation in support of subparagraph (A) and (B) in accordance with procedures established by the State educational agency; and
(4)
additional situations as States and local education authorities deem necessary and appropriate.
(d)
Minimum requirement
The requirements in this Act shall constitute a minimum standard. Nothing in this Act shall be construed to preempt or prevent a State, State educational agency, or local educational agency from enacting more restrictive policies regarding student possession or use of mobile phones or other personal electronic devices during school hours, on school grounds, or during school activities.
(e)
Grant program authorized
(1)
In general
The Secretary of Education shall establish a grant program to provide funding to State educational agencies to purchase, implement, or maintain secure storage methods, and related training or infrastructure, in accordance with a personal electronic device policy established by such State educational agency pursuant to subsection (a).
(2)
Application
To be eligible to receive a grant under this subsection, a State educational agency shall submit to the Secretary an application at such time, in such manner, and containing such information as the Secretary may require.
4.
Definitions
For purposes of this Act:
(1)
ESEA terms
The terms elementary school , English learner , local educational agency , secondary school , State , and State educational agency have the meanings given the terms in section 8101 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 ( 20 U.S.C. 7801 ).
(2)
Individualized education program
The term individualized education program has the meaning given such term in section 602 of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act ( 20 U.S.C. 1401 ).
(3)
Mobile phone
The term mobile phone means any handheld communication device with cellular, Wi-Fi, or Bluetooth capability, including smartphones and similar devices.
(4)
Personal electronic device
The term personal electronic device —
(A)
includes mobile phones, smartwatches, tablets, and other handheld or wearable devices with communication, internet, or multimedia capabilities; and
(B)
does not include laptops or tablets that are authorized by the school and used solely for instructional purposes under teacher supervision so long as such laptops or tablets are restricted from accessing social media platforms, personal email, messaging or texting services, and other non-academic applications during instructional time.
(5)
Public school
The term public school means—
(A)
a public elementary school; and
(B)
a public secondary school.
(6)
School hours
The term school hours means the period from the start of the instructional day until the end of the instructional day, as defined by the State educational agency.

Tracker

The tracker indicates the progress of this legislation as it moves through the legislative process.

  1. Introduced2025-04-07
  2. Passed House
  3. Passed Senate
  4. Conference
  5. To President
  6. Became Law

To require State educational agencies to implement policies prohibiting the use or possession of personal mobile phones by students in public school classrooms during school hours, and for other purposes.

Sponsors

Rep. Eugene Vindman (D) sponsors H.R. 2700, and 2 members have co-sponsored it.

Committees

H.R. 2700 went before 1 committee: Education and Workforce.

Education and Workforce
Education and Workforce
Referred To · Apr 7, 2025 · 824 Bills

Actions

H.R. 2700 has taken 2 actions since Apr 7, 2025.

ChamberAction
Apr 7, 2025
House
Introduced in House
Apr 7, 2025
House
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.Education and Workforce Committee

Votes

H.R. 2700 has not gone to a roll call.

Titles

H.R. 2700 goes by 4 titles, 2 of them short titles.

  • UNPLUGGED Act of 2025 — Display Title
  • UNPLUGGED Act of 2025 — Short Title(s) as Introduced
  • Utilize No Phones in Learning to Unleash Growth in Grades and Educate Distraction-free Act of 2025 — Short Title(s) as Introduced
  • To require State educational agencies to implement policies prohibiting the use or possession of personal mobile phones by students in public school classrooms during school hours, and for other purposes. — Official Title as Introduced

Lobbying

2 clients hired 2 firms and 14 registered lobbyists who named H.R. 2700 in 5 quarterly filings, 2025. Reported under the Lobbying Disclosure Act; a filing’s income covers everything its registrant worked that quarter, so the amounts below are the filings’, not this bill’s.

Filed under Education, Government Issues, Health Issues, Immigration, Labor Issues/Antitrust/Workplace, Taxation/Internal Revenue Code, Energy/Nuclear, Environment/Superfund.

Clients

Who paid to be heard, by how many filings named the bill.

ClientBusinessStateFirmsFilingsReported
ASSOCIATED BUILDERS AND CONTRACTORS INCDistrict of Columbia14
AMERICAN FEDERATION OF TEACHERSDistrict of Columbia11

Firms

Registrants who filed on the bill, by filings.

Lobbyists

Named on the filings that cite the bill.

Filings

The documents themselves, on the Senate’s Lobbying Disclosure site, largest reported first.

ClientRegistrantPeriodReportedDocument
ASSOCIATED BUILDERS AND CONTRACTORS INCASSOCIATED BUILDERS AND CONTRACTORS, INC.2025 fourth_quarter$700K4th Quarter - Report
ASSOCIATED BUILDERS AND CONTRACTORS INCASSOCIATED BUILDERS AND CONTRACTORS, INC.2025 third_quarter$700K3rd Quarter - Report
ASSOCIATED BUILDERS AND CONTRACTORS INCASSOCIATED BUILDERS AND CONTRACTORS, INC.2025 second_quarter$700K2nd Quarter - Report
ASSOCIATED BUILDERS AND CONTRACTORS INCASSOCIATED BUILDERS AND CONTRACTORS, INC.2025 first_quarter$700K1st Quarter - Report
AMERICAN FEDERATION OF TEACHERSAMERICAN FEDERATION OF TEACHERS2025 third_quarter$430K3rd Quarter - Report

Classification

The Congressional Research Service files H.R. 2700 under Education, one of its 31 policy areas.

CRS Subjects

CRS assigns every bill one policy area from its 31; H.R. 2700’s is Education.

hr2700/policy-areas.txt
EducationAgriculture and FoodAnimalsArmed Forces and National SecurityArts, Culture, ReligionCivil Rights and Liberties, Minority IssuesCommerceCongressCrime and Law EnforcementEconomics and Public FinanceEmergency ManagementEnergyEnvironmental ProtectionFamiliesFinance and Financial SectorForeign Trade and International FinanceGovernment Operations and PoliticsHealthHousing and Community DevelopmentImmigrationInternational AffairsLabor and EmploymentLawNative AmericansPublic Lands and Natural ResourcesScience, Technology, CommunicationsSocial WelfareSports and RecreationTaxationTransportation and Public WorksWater Resources Development

Constitutional authority

The clause the sponsor cites as Congress’s power to enact H.R. 2700, as entered in the Congressional Record.

[Congressional Record Volume 171, Number 62 (Monday, April 7, 2025)][House]From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]By Mr. VINDMAN:H.R. 2700.Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuantto the following:Article I, Section 8[Page H1461]

Source: congress.gov · legiscan.com