Search

Search bills, members, committees and pages...

H.R. 2240

U.S. HouseIn Senate Committee

Summary

H.R. 2240, the Improving Law Enforcement Officer Safety and Wellness Through Data Act, was introduced in the House on Mar 21, 2025 by Rep. Tim Moore (R) with 22 co-sponsors. It was referred to Judiciary, and last saw action on May 19, 2025: Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.


Record

Text

H.R. 2240 has 22 co-sponsors, 1 roll call and 1 amendment.

hb2240/engrossed-in-house.txt
119 HR 2240 EH: Improving Law Enforcement Officer Safety and Wellness Through Data Act
U.S. House of Representatives
text/xml
EN
Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.
IB
119th CONGRESS 1st Session
H. R. 2240
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
AN ACT
To require the Attorney General to develop reports relating to violent attacks against law enforcement officers, and for other purposes.
1.
Short title
This Act may be cited as the Improving Law Enforcement Officer Safety and Wellness Through Data Act .
2.
Findings
Congress finds the following:
(1)
There has been a rise in anti-police rhetoric and a corresponding rise in violence against law enforcement officers.
(2)
In 2022, a total of 60 police officers were feloniously killed in the line of duty.
(3)
Nearly 30 percent of police officer killings in 2022 were caused by unprovoked attacks or ambushes on officers.
(4)
Law enforcement officers bravely put themselves at risk for the betterment of society.
(5)
A data collection that represents the full circumstances surrounding violent attacks and ambush attacks on law enforcement officers is vital for the provision of needed Federal resources to Federal, State, and local law enforcement officers.
(6)
Police suffer assaults and other offenses that do not rise to the level of Law Enforcement Officers Killed and Assaulted or National Incident-Based Reporting System reporting due to the frequency of such incidents, lower risk to officers, and minimal administrative resources to report such frequent events.
(7)
The mental health of law enforcement officers has suffered due to overwork, recruitment issues, and the general stress of their work.
(8)
The people of the United States will always remember the victims of these hateful attacks against law enforcement officers and stand in solidarity with individuals affected by these senseless tragedies and incidents of hate that have affected law enforcement communities and their families.
(9)
The United States must demonstrate to its brave law enforcement officers that they are important, valued, and respected.
(10)
Congress has made a commitment to helping communities protect the lives of their police officers, as evidenced by the Bulletproof Vest Partnership Grant Program Reauthorization Act of 2015 ( Public Law 114–155 ; 130 Stat. 389) and other laws.
(11)
Subsection (c) of the Uniform Federal Crime Reporting Act of 1988 ( 34 U.S.C. 41303(c) ) requires the Attorney General to acquire, collect, classify, and preserve national data on Federal criminal offenses as part of the Uniform Crime Reports and requires all Federal departments and agencies that investigate criminal activity to report details about crime within their respective jurisdiction to the Attorney General in a uniform matter and on a form prescribed by the Attorney General .
3.
Attacks on law enforcement officers reporting requirement
(a)
In general
Not later than 270 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Attorney General, in consultation with the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Director of the National Institute of Justice, and the Director of the Criminal Justice Information Services Division of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, shall submit to the Committee on the Judiciary of the Senate and the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives a report that includes—
(1)
the number of offenders that intentionally target law enforcement officers because of their status as law enforcement officers;
(2)
the number of incidents reported to the Law Enforcement Officers Killed and Assaulted Data Collection that occur through the coordinated actions of 2 or more parties;
(3)
a description of the Federal response to ambushes and violent attacks on Federal law enforcement officers;
(4)
a detailed survey of what State and local responses are to ambushes and violent attacks on State and local law enforcement officers;
(5)
recommendations for improving State, local, and Federal responses to ambushes and violent attacks on law enforcement officers;
(6)
a detailed survey of Federal and State-based training programs that law enforcement officers receive in preparation for violent attacks, including ambush attacks;
(7)
an analysis of the effectiveness of the programs described in paragraph (6) in preparing law enforcement officers for violent attacks, including ambush attacks;
(8)
recommendations on how to improve State, local, and Federal training programs for law enforcement officers relating to ambush attacks;
(9)
an analysis of, with respect to the Patrick Leahy Bulletproof Vest Partnership under part Y of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 ( 34 U.S.C. 10530 et seq. )—
(A)
the efficacy of the Partnership in distributing protective gear to law enforcement officers across the United States, including any location-specific limitations to the distribution under such Partnership; and
(B)
the general limitations of the Partnership, including any location-specific limitations to the distributions under the Partnership, considering the fact that law enforcement officers are suffering from ambush attacks;
(10)
an analysis of the ability of the Department of Justice to combine the Law Enforcement Officers Killed and Assaulted Data Collection and a 09C Justifiable Homicide report for officer-involved shooting reports and any roadblocks to producing a clear report with such information;
(11)
an analysis of the ability of the Criminal Justice Information Services of the Federal Bureau of Investigation to expand data collection to include a suspect offender’s level of injury at the time of a reported Law Enforcement Officers Killed and Assaulted Data Collection incident;
(12)
an analysis of the existence and extent of, and reasons for, disparities in the availability and reporting of data between—
(A)
data relating to ambush attacks against law enforcement officers; and
(B)
other types of violent crime data; and
(13)
an analysis of any additional legislative tools or authorities that may be helpful or necessary to assist in deterring ambush attacks against law enforcement officers.
(b)
Development
In developing the report required under subsection (a), the Attorney General, the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Director of the National Institute of Justice, and the Director of the Criminal Justice Information Services Division of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, shall consult relevant stakeholders, including—
(1)
Federal, State, Tribal, and local law enforcement agencies; and
(2)
nongovernmental organizations, international organizations, academies, or other entities.
4.
Aggression against law enforcement officers reporting requirement
(a)
In general
Not later than 270 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Attorney General, in consultation with the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Director of the National Institute of Justice, shall submit to the Committee on the Judiciary of the Senate and the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives a report on—
(1)
an analysis of the ability to implement a new category in the Uniform Crime Reporting System and the National Incident-Based Reporting System on aggressive actions, conduct, or other trauma-inducing incidents against law enforcement officers that, as of the date of enactment of this Act, are not reported in such systems;
(2)
the level of detail the category described in paragraph (1) would include and the standard of evidence that would be used for any reported incidents;
(3)
an analysis of how to engage State and local law enforcement agencies in reporting the data described in paragraph (1), despite the fact that such data is beyond the standard crime-based reporting to the systems described in paragraph (1);
(4)
an analysis of potential uses by the Department of Justice and any component agencies of the Department of Justice of the data described in paragraph (1);
(5)
an analysis of the existence and extent of, and reasons for, disparities in the availability and reporting of data between—
(A)
data relating to aggressive actions or other trauma-inducing incidents against law enforcement officers that do not rise to the level of crimes; and
(B)
other types of violent crime data; and
(6)
an analysis of additional legislative tools or authorities that may be helpful or necessary to assist in deterring aggressive actions, conduct, or other trauma-inducing incidents against law enforcement officers.
(b)
Development
In developing the report under subsection (a), the Attorney General, the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and the Director of the National Institute of Justice shall consult relevant stakeholders, including—
(1)
Federal, State, Tribal, and local law enforcement agencies; and
(2)
nongovernmental organizations, international organizations, academies, or other entities.
5.
Mental health and wellness reporting requirement
(a)
In general
Not later than 270 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Attorney General, in consultation with the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Director of the National Institute of Justice, shall submit to the Committee on the Judiciary of the Senate and the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives a report on—
(1)
the types, frequency, and severity of mental health and stress-related responses of law enforcement officers to aggressive actions or other trauma-inducing incidents against law enforcement officers;
(2)
mental health and stress-related resources or programs that are available to law enforcement officers at the Federal, State, and local levels, especially peer-to-peer programs;
(3)
the extent to which law enforcement officers use the resources or programs described in paragraph (2);
(4)
the availability of, or need for, mental health screening within Federal, State, and local law enforcement agencies; and
(5)
additional legislative tools or authorities that may be helpful or necessary to assist in assessing, monitoring, and improving the mental health and wellness of Federal, State, and local law enforcement officers.
(b)
Development
In developing the report required under subsection (a), the Attorney General, the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and the Director of the National Institute of Justice shall consult relevant stakeholders, including—
(1)
Federal, State, Tribal and local law enforcement agencies; and
(2)
nongovernmental organizations, international organizations, academies, or other entities.
Passed the House of Representatives May 15, 2025. Kevin F. McCumber, Clerk.

Tracker

The tracker indicates the progress of this legislation as it moves through the legislative process.

  1. Introduced2025-03-21
  2. Passed House2025-05-15
  3. Passed Senate
  4. Conference
  5. To President
  6. Became Law

CRS Summary

The summaries are the Congressional Research Service’s, one per stage. Read them in full.

Introduced in House Mar 21, 2025

hb2240/introduced-in-house.md

Shown Here:
Introduced in House (03/21/2025)

Improving Law Enforcement Officer Safety and Wellness Through Data Act of 2025

This bill requires the Department of Justice to report on (1) targeted attacks on law enforcement officers, (2) the feasibility of incorporating such attacks into existing crime reporting systems, and (3) the mental health resources that are available to law enforcement officers.

Sponsors

Rep. Tim Moore (R) sponsors H.R. 2240, and 22 members have co-sponsored it, 12 of them from the day it was introduced.

Committees

H.R. 2240 went before 2 committees: Judiciary and Judiciary.

Judiciary
Judiciary
Referred To · May 19, 2025
Judiciary
Judiciary
Reported By · Apr 28, 2025 · 2,181 Bills

Reports

1 committee report has been filed on H.R. 2240, the latest H. Rept. 119-79.

  • H. Rept. 119-79 — IMPROVING LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER SAFETY AND WELLNESS THROUGH DATA ACT

Actions

H.R. 2240 has taken 17 actions since Mar 21, 2025, the latest on May 19, 2025.

ChamberAction
May 19, 2025
Senate
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.Judiciary Committee
May 15, 202513:08
House
Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 405. (consideration: CR H2071-2077)
May 15, 202513:08
House
Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 2240, H.R. 2243 and H.R. 2255. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 2240, H.R. 2243, and H.R. 2255. All bills are being considered under a closed rule with each bill having one motion to recommit.
May 15, 202513:09
House
DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H.R. 2240.
May 15, 202513:55
House
The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.

Votes

H.R. 2240 went to 1 roll call in the House, the latest on May 15, 2025 at 40311.

ChamberQuestion
Yea
Nay
May 15, 2025
House
On Passage
403
11

Amendments

1 amendment has been offered to H.R. 2240, the latest acted on May 15, 2025.

2 bills are related to H.R. 2240.

Titles

H.R. 2240 goes by 7 titles, 4 of them short titles.

  • To require the Attorney General to develop reports relating to violent attacks against law enforcement officers, and for other purposes. — Official Titles from EH (Engrossed in House) bill text
  • Improving Law Enforcement Officer Safety and Wellness Through Data Act — Short Titles from RFS (Referred to Senate) bill text
  • Improving Law Enforcement Officer Safety and Wellness Through Data Act — Short Title(s) as Passed House
  • Improving Law Enforcement Officer Safety and Wellness Through Data Act — Display Title
  • Improving Law Enforcement Officer Safety and Wellness Through Data Act — Short Title(s) as Reported to House
  • Improving Law Enforcement Officer Safety and Wellness Through Data Act of 2025 — Short Title(s) as Introduced
  • To require the Attorney General to develop reports relating to violent attacks against law enforcement officers, and for other purposes. — Official Title as Introduced

Cost estimate

The Congressional Budget Office has filed 1 estimate for H.R. 2240, the latest on Mar 31, 2025.


Lobbying

6 clients hired 6 firms and 27 registered lobbyists who named H.R. 2240 in 26 quarterly filings, 2025 to 2026. Reported under the Lobbying Disclosure Act; a filing’s income covers everything its registrant worked that quarter, so the amounts below are the filings’, not this bill’s.

Filed under Law Enforcement/Crime/Criminal Justice, Labor Issues/Antitrust/Workplace, Budget/Appropriations, Firearms/Guns/Ammunition, Health Issues, Taxation/Internal Revenue Code, Retirement, Housing.

Clients

Who paid to be heard, by how many filings named the bill.

ClientBusinessStateFirmsFilingsReported
NATIONAL FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICEDistrict of Columbia110
NORTH CAROLINA FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICEpolice organizationNorth Carolina16$63K
INTERNATIONAL UNION OF POLICE ASSOCIATIONS AFL-CIOFlorida15
PEACE OFFICERS RESEARCH ASSOCIATION OF CALIFORNIALaw enforcementCalifornia12$100K
SERGEANTS BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION OF NEW YORK CITYLabor organizationNew York12$60K
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNIONDistrict of Columbia11

Firms

Registrants who filed on the bill, by filings.

Lobbyists

Named on the filings that cite the bill. The 20 named most often, of 27.

Filings

The documents themselves, on the Senate’s Lobbying Disclosure site, largest reported first.

ClientRegistrantPeriodReportedDocument
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNIONAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION2025 second_quarter$640K2nd Quarter - Report
NATIONAL FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICENATIONAL FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE2026 second_quarter$100K2nd Quarter - Report
NATIONAL FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICENATIONAL FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE2026 first_quarter$100K1st Quarter - Report
NATIONAL FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICENATIONAL FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE2025 fourth_quarter$100K4th Quarter - Amendme…
NATIONAL FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICENATIONAL FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE2025 third_quarter$100K3rd Quarter - Amendme…
NATIONAL FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICENATIONAL FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE2025 second_quarter$100K2nd Quarter - Amendme…
NATIONAL FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICENATIONAL FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE2025 first_quarter$100K1st Quarter - Amendme…
NATIONAL FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICENATIONAL FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE2025 fourth_quarter$100K4th Quarter - Report
NATIONAL FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICENATIONAL FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE2025 third_quarter$100K3rd Quarter - Report
NATIONAL FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICENATIONAL FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE2025 second_quarter$100K2nd Quarter - Report
NATIONAL FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICENATIONAL FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE2025 first_quarter$100K1st Quarter - Report
PEACE OFFICERS RESEARCH ASSOCIATION OF CALIFORNIASTEPTOE LLP2026 second_quarter$50K2nd Quarter - Report
PEACE OFFICERS RESEARCH ASSOCIATION OF CALIFORNIASTEPTOE LLP2026 first_quarter$50K1st Quarter - Report
SERGEANTS BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION OF NEW YORK CITYLONGBOW PUBLIC POLICY GROUP, LLC2025 second_quarter$30K2nd Quarter - Report
SERGEANTS BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION OF NEW YORK CITYLONGBOW PUBLIC POLICY GROUP, LLC2025 first_quarter$30K1st Quarter - Report
INTERNATIONAL UNION OF POLICE ASSOCIATIONS AFL-CIOINTERNATIONAL UNION OF POLICE ASSOCIATIONS, AFL-CIO2026 second_quarter$20K2nd Quarter - Report
INTERNATIONAL UNION OF POLICE ASSOCIATIONS AFL-CIOINTERNATIONAL UNION OF POLICE ASSOCIATIONS, AFL-CIO2026 first_quarter$20K1st Quarter - Report
INTERNATIONAL UNION OF POLICE ASSOCIATIONS AFL-CIOINTERNATIONAL UNION OF POLICE ASSOCIATIONS, AFL-CIO2025 fourth_quarter$20K4th Quarter - Report
INTERNATIONAL UNION OF POLICE ASSOCIATIONS AFL-CIOINTERNATIONAL UNION OF POLICE ASSOCIATIONS, AFL-CIO2025 third_quarter$20K3rd Quarter - Report
INTERNATIONAL UNION OF POLICE ASSOCIATIONS AFL-CIOINTERNATIONAL UNION OF POLICE ASSOCIATIONS, AFL-CIO2025 second_quarter$20K2nd Quarter - Amendme…

Classification

The Congressional Research Service files H.R. 2240 under Crime and Law Enforcement, one of its 31 policy areas, and gives it 5 legislative subjects.

CRS Subjects

CRS assigns every bill one policy area from its 31; H.R. 2240’s is Crime and Law Enforcement.

hr2240/policy-areas.txt
Crime and Law EnforcementAgriculture and FoodAnimalsArmed Forces and National SecurityArts, Culture, ReligionCivil Rights and Liberties, Minority IssuesCommerceCongressEconomics and Public FinanceEducationEmergency ManagementEnergyEnvironmental ProtectionFamiliesFinance and Financial SectorForeign Trade and International FinanceGovernment Operations and PoliticsHealthHousing and Community DevelopmentImmigrationInternational AffairsLabor and EmploymentLawNative AmericansPublic Lands and Natural ResourcesScience, Technology, CommunicationsSocial WelfareSports and RecreationTaxationTransportation and Public WorksWater Resources Development

Legislative Subjects

H.R. 2240 carries 5 of CRS’s legislative subjects, from Data collection, sharing, protection to Violent crime.

hr2240/subjects.txt
Data collection, sharing, protectionGovernment studies and investigationsLaw enforcement officersMental healthViolent crime

Constitutional authority

The clause the sponsor cites as Congress’s power to enact H.R. 2240, as entered in the Congressional Record.

[Congressional Record Volume 171, Number 52 (Friday, March 21, 2025)][House]From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]By Mr. MOORE of North Carolina:H.R. 2240.Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuantto the following:Section 8 of Article I of the U.S. Constitution.[Page H1189]

Source: congress.gov · legiscan.com