- H.R. 10171August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10156August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10172August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10160August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10181August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10176August 27, 2026
- H.Res. 1496August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10164August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10170August 27, 2026
- H.Res. 1494August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10163August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10157August 27, 2026
- Administration
- Agriculture
- Agriculture, Nutrition, And Forestry
- Appropriations
- Armed Services
- Banking, Housing, And Urban Affairs
- Budget
- Commerce, Science, And Transportation
- Education and Workforce
- Energy And Commerce
- Energy And Natural Resources
- Environment And Public Works
- Ethics
- Finance
- Financial Services
- Foreign Affairs
- Foreign Relations
- Health, Education, Labor, And Pensions
- Homeland Security
- Homeland Security And Governmental Affa…
- Indian Affairs
- Indian and Insular Affairs
- Intelligence
- Judiciary
- Natural Resources
- Oversight And Government Reform
- Permanent Select Intelligence
- Rules
- Rules And Administration
- Science, Space, And Technology
- Select Intelligence
- Small Business
- Small Business And Entrepreneurship
- Subcommittee on Aviation
- Subcommittee on Border Security and Enf…
- Subcommittee on Coast Guard and Maritim…
- Subcommittee on Commodity Markets, Digi…
- Subcommittee on Conservation, Research,…
- Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and In…
- Subcommittee on Cybersecurity and Infra…
- Subcommittee on Disability Assistance a…
- Subcommittee on Economic Development, P…
- Subcommittee on Economic Opportunity
- Subcommittee on Emergency Management an…
- Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Reso…
- Subcommittee on Federal Lands
- Subcommittee on Forestry and Horticultu…
- Subcommittee on General Farm Commoditie…
- Subcommittee on Health
- Subcommittee on Highways and Transit
- Subcommittee on Livestock, Dairy, and P…
- Subcommittee on Nutrition and Foreign A…
- Subcommittee on Oversight and Investiga…
- Subcommittee on Oversight, Investigatio…
- Subcommittee on Railroads, Pipelines, a…
- Subcommittee on Transportation and Mari…
- Subcommittee on Water Resources and Env…
- Subcommittee on Water, Wildlife and Fis…
- Transportation And Infrastructure
- Veterans' Affairs
- Ways And Means

H.Res. 232
U.S. House•In House Committee
Summary
H.Res. 232, “Calling on the Government of Panama to expel officials and interests of the People's Republic of China and terminate Chinese management of key Panamanian ports”, was introduced in the House on Mar 21, 2025 by Rep. Jodey Arrington (R) with 1 co-sponsor. It was referred to Foreign Affairs, and last saw action on Mar 21, 2025: Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Record
Text
H.Res. 232 has 1 co-sponsor.
hr232/introduced-in-house.txt119 HRES 232 IH: Calling on the Government of Panama to expel officials and interests of the People’s Republic of China and terminate Chinese management of key Panamanian ports.U.S. House of Representatives2025-03-21text/xmlENPursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.IV119th CONGRESS1st SessionH. RES. 232IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVESMarch 21, 2025Mr. Arrington (for himself and Mr. Burchett ) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign AffairsRESOLUTIONCalling on the Government of Panama to expel officials and interests of the People’s Republic of China and terminate Chinese management of key Panamanian ports.Whereas the strategic location of the Panama Canal is vital to global trade and the security of the Western Hemisphere;Whereas Panamanians and Americans have invested significantly to secure the sovereignty, stability, and prosperity of Panama, including the construction, defense, and transfer of the Panama Canal, ensuring it remains a critical asset for global commerce;Whereas the construction of the Panama Canal by the United States required more than a decade of work (1904–1914), involved tens of thousands of workers, and cost approximately $375,000,000, equivalent to more than $10,000,000,000 in 2025, with thousands of workers losing their lives due to disease and hazardous conditions;Whereas the defense and operation of the Panama Canal during the 20th century further demonstrated the United States commitment, at significant financial and human cost, to maintaining the vital global trade route;Whereas the Treaty Concerning the Permanent Neutrality and Operation of the Panama Canal, signed at Washington September 7, 1977 (commonly referred to as the Neutrality Treaty ), prohibits actions that undermine the canal’s neutrality or threaten United States security interests and grants the United States the right to act, unilaterally if necessary, to defend the canal’s neutrality and ensure its operational security;Whereas the Neutrality Treaty obligates Panama and the United States to act against any threat to the neutrality or peaceful operation of the Panama Canal, including undue foreign control over its infrastructure or management;Whereas when President Carter ratified the Neutrality Treaty, President Carter accepted a legally binding condition to the Treaty, adopted by the United States Senate, establishing an independent right of the United States to intervene militarily, consistent with United States constitutional processes, to reopen or restore the operations of the Panama Canal, as the United States deems necessary, to ensure the canal remains open, neutral, secure, and accessible;Whereas the People’s Republic of China, through state-owned enterprises and Chinese government-affiliated private entities, has expanded its influence with key infrastructure projects and ports around the world, including in Panama, raising concerns about undue leverage and potential threats to free and fair navigation and trade;Whereas the People’s Republic of China Belt and Road Initiative fosters economic dependence and exerts outsized geopolitical influence through its investments;Whereas Panama joined the Belt and Road Initiative in December 2018;Whereas the involvement of Chinese government-affiliated enterprises in the construction, management, and maintenance of other critical infrastructure, such as a proposed fourth bridge spanning the Panama Canal, calls into question the ability of Panama and the United States to defend the canal’s neutrality and ensure its operational security;Whereas two major ports in Panama, the ports of Balboa and Cristobal, are currently managed by Chinese-affiliated entities, such as Hutchison Ports, a Hong Kong-based operator with significant ties to China’s economic and political ecosystem, threatening the sovereignty of Panama and the security of the Western Hemisphere;Whereas the involvement of officials from the People’s Republic of China and entities that are subject to the National Security Law of the People’s Republic of China and similar laws in Panamanian ports and infrastructure compromises international security and disrupts critical trade routes;Whereas the People’s Republic of China’s control over portions of the infrastructure of the Panama Canal poses a direct threat to the national security and strategic interests of the United States;Whereas allowing foreign exploitation of Panama’s ports and infrastructure undermines the sacrifices made to secure Panama’s independence and the shared values between Panama and the United States; andWhereas the United States and Panama have a long history of partnership and shared commitment to democratic governance, sovereignty, and the rule of law: Now, therefore, be itThat the House of Representatives—(1)expresses profound concern about the presence and influence of the People’s Republic of China in Panamanian ports and infrastructure, particularly in facilities of strategic significance such as the ports of Balboa and Cristobal;(2)calls upon the Government of Panama to—(A)reaffirm its commitment to the permanent neutrality of the Panama Canal as defined by the Neutrality Treaty by seeking management structures that ensure unbiased, equitable access for vessels of all nations;(B)review and terminate agreements allowing Chinese state-owned enterprises or China-based so-called private entities to manage strategic infrastructure, including the ports of Balboa and Cristobal;(C)expel all officials from the People’s Republic of China operating within Panamanian ports and other critical infrastructure projects; and(D)reaffirm its commitment to maintaining the sovereignty of Panama and protecting the security of the Western Hemisphere by seeking partnerships that align with democratic values and mutual respect;(3)urges the Government of the United States to—(A)leverage provisions in the Neutrality Treaty, including Condition (1), to monitor and address threats to the neutrality of the Panama Canal, acting decisively to counter undue foreign influence;(B)provide technical, financial, and strategic support to Panama as it seeks to assert sovereignty over its critical infrastructure and reduce its dependence on entities affiliated with the People’s Republic of China;(C)strengthen collaboration with Panama and other allies in the region to promote transparent and sustainable investments in infrastructure projects;(D)establish a framework to restore operational control of the Panama Canal to a collaborative partnership between the United States and Panama, which should honor the spirit of the Neutrality Treaty, respect Panama’s sovereignty, and incorporate United States expertise and resources to benefit both nations;(E)offer significant United States investments to modernize Panama’s canal infrastructure and provide alternatives to Chinese-funded projects; and(F)develop a joint United States-Panama task force to oversee canal security and operations, enhancing regional security and ensuring freedom of navigation;(4)encourages Panama and other regional and global allies to monitor and counter efforts by authoritarian regimes to exploit economic vulnerabilities to gain strategic leverage in the Western Hemisphere; and(5)directs that the Secretary of the Senate transmit a copy of this resolution to the President of the United States, the Secretary of State, the President of Panama, and the National Assembly of Panama.
Tracker
The tracker indicates the progress of this legislation as it moves through the legislative process.
- Introduced2025-03-21
- Passed House
CRS Summary
The summaries are the Congressional Research Service’s, one per stage. Read them in full.
Introduced in House Mar 21, 2025
hr232/introduced-in-house.mdShown Here:
Introduced in House (03/21/2025)
Sponsors
Rep. Jodey Arrington (R) sponsors H.Res. 232, and 1 member has co-sponsored it from the day it was introduced.
Committees
H.Res. 232 went before 1 committee: Foreign Affairs.
Actions
H.Res. 232 has taken 2 actions since Mar 21, 2025.
| Chamber | Action | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Mar 21, 2025 | House | Submitted in House | ||
Mar 21, 2025 | House | Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.Foreign Affairs Committee |
Votes
H.Res. 232 has not gone to a roll call.
Related bills
1 bill is related to H.Res. 232, as Identical bill.
Titles
H.Res. 232 goes by 2 titles.
- Calling on the Government of Panama to expel officials and interests of the People's Republic of China and terminate Chinese management of key Panamanian ports. — Official Title as Introduced
- Calling on the Government of Panama to expel officials and interests of the People's Republic of China and terminate Chinese management of key Panamanian ports. — Display Title
Classification
The Congressional Research Service files H.Res. 232 under International Affairs, one of its 31 policy areas.
CRS Subjects
CRS assigns every bill one policy area from its 31; H.Res. 232’s is International Affairs.
hres232/policy-areas.txtSource: congress.gov · legiscan.com
