- H.R. 10171August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10156August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10172August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10160August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10181August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10176August 27, 2026
- H.Res. 1496August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10164August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10170August 27, 2026
- H.Res. 1494August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10163August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10157August 27, 2026
- Administration
- Agriculture
- Agriculture, Nutrition, And Forestry
- Appropriations
- Armed Services
- Banking, Housing, And Urban Affairs
- Budget
- Commerce, Science, And Transportation
- Education and Workforce
- Energy And Commerce
- Energy And Natural Resources
- Environment And Public Works
- Ethics
- Finance
- Financial Services
- Foreign Affairs
- Foreign Relations
- Health, Education, Labor, And Pensions
- Homeland Security
- Homeland Security And Governmental Affa…
- Indian Affairs
- Indian and Insular Affairs
- Intelligence
- Judiciary
- Natural Resources
- Oversight And Government Reform
- Permanent Select Intelligence
- Rules
- Rules And Administration
- Science, Space, And Technology
- Select Intelligence
- Small Business
- Small Business And Entrepreneurship
- Subcommittee on Aviation
- Subcommittee on Border Security and Enf…
- Subcommittee on Coast Guard and Maritim…
- Subcommittee on Commodity Markets, Digi…
- Subcommittee on Conservation, Research,…
- Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and In…
- Subcommittee on Cybersecurity and Infra…
- Subcommittee on Disability Assistance a…
- Subcommittee on Economic Development, P…
- Subcommittee on Economic Opportunity
- Subcommittee on Emergency Management an…
- Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Reso…
- Subcommittee on Federal Lands
- Subcommittee on Forestry and Horticultu…
- Subcommittee on General Farm Commoditie…
- Subcommittee on Health
- Subcommittee on Highways and Transit
- Subcommittee on Livestock, Dairy, and P…
- Subcommittee on Nutrition and Foreign A…
- Subcommittee on Oversight and Investiga…
- Subcommittee on Oversight, Investigatio…
- Subcommittee on Railroads, Pipelines, a…
- Subcommittee on Transportation and Mari…
- Subcommittee on Water Resources and Env…
- Subcommittee on Water, Wildlife and Fis…
- Transportation And Infrastructure
- Veterans' Affairs
- Ways And Means

H.R. 1856
U.S. House•In House Committee
Summary
H.R. 1856, the CASE LOAD Act of 2025, was introduced in the House on Mar 5, 2025 by Rep. Jim Costa (D) with 1 co-sponsor. It was referred to Judiciary, and last saw action on Mar 5, 2025: Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Record
Text
H.R. 1856 has 1 co-sponsor.
hb1856/introduced-in-house.txt119 HR 1856 IH: Creating Additional Seats to Ease Legally Overburdened Adjudicators’ Dockets Act of 2025U.S. House of Representatives2025-03-05text/xmlENPursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.I 119th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 1856 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES March 5, 2025 Mr. Costa (for himself and Mr. Obernolte ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary A BILLTo authorize additional district judges for the district court for the eastern district of California.1.Short titleThis Act may be cited as the Creating Additional Seats to Ease Legally Overburdened Adjudicators’ Dockets Act of 2025 or the CASE LOAD Act of 2025 .2.FindingsCongress finds the following:(1)The Federal district court for the eastern district of California is the Federal trial court for 34 counties, including five of the fastest-growing cities in the State of California, serving a population of approximately 8,400,000.(2)The Federal district court for the eastern district of California is one of the largest judicial districts in the country, with approximately 8,400,000 residents and over 87,000 square miles of land. Yet, there are only six permanent judgeships, with one upcoming vacancy pending a nomination elevating a sitting district judge.(3)Based on the 2019 U.S. census data, the ratio of authorized district judgeships to population was 1:1,362,552. The central district of California has the next highest ratio in the State, nearly half the size, with 1:694,323.(4)As of June 2022, the total pending cases per judgeship in the Federal district court for the eastern district of California was 1,308, over 2.6 times larger than the average for all districts within the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Pending caseloads remain high, and if a new vacancy opens upon the elevation of the district judge, caseloads will once again reach this unsustainable level.3.Additional district judges for the eastern district of California(a)2027(1)Additional judgeshipsOn or after January 21, 2027, the President shall appoint, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, 2 additional district judges for the eastern district of California.(2)Clerical amendmentThe table contained in section 133(a) of title 28, United States Code, is amended by striking the items relating to California and inserting the following:California:Northern 14Eastern 8Central 27Southern 13 .(3)Effective dateThe amendment made by paragraph (2) shall take effect on January 20, 2027.(b)2029(1)Additional judgeshipsOn or after January 5, 2029, the President shall appoint, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, 1 additional district judge for the eastern district of California.(2)Clerical amendmentThe table contained in section 133(a) of title 28, United States Code, is amended by striking the items relating to California and inserting the following:California: Northern 14 Eastern 9 Central 27 Southern 13 .(3)Effective dateThe amendment made by paragraph (2) shall take effect on January 4, 2029.(c)2031(1)Additional judgeshipsOn or after January 21, 2031, the President shall appoint, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, 2 additional district judges for the eastern district of California.(2)Clerical amendmentThe table contained in section 133(a) of title 28, United States Code, is amended by striking the items relating to California and inserting the following:California:Northern 14Eastern 11Central 27Southern 13 .(3)Effective dateThe amendment made by paragraph (2) shall take effect on January 20, 2031.4.Authorization of appropriationsThere are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be necessary to carry out this Act and the amendments made by this Act, including such sums as may be necessary to provide appropriate space and facilities for the judicial positions created by this Act or an amendment made by this Act.
Tracker
The tracker indicates the progress of this legislation as it moves through the legislative process.
- Introduced2025-03-05
- Passed House
- Passed Senate
- Conference
- To President
- Became Law
To authorize additional district judges for the district court for the eastern district of California.
Sponsors
Rep. Jim Costa (D) sponsors H.R. 1856, and 1 member has co-sponsored it from the day it was introduced.
Committees
H.R. 1856 went before 1 committee: Judiciary.
Actions
H.R. 1856 has taken 2 actions since Mar 5, 2025.
| Chamber | Action | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Mar 5, 2025 | House | Introduced in House | ||
Mar 5, 2025 | House | Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.Judiciary Committee |
Votes
H.R. 1856 has not gone to a roll call.
Titles
H.R. 1856 goes by 4 titles, 2 of them short titles.
- CASE LOAD Act of 2025 — Display Title
- CASE LOAD Act of 2025 — Short Title(s) as Introduced
- Creating Additional Seats to Ease Legally Overburdened Adjudicators’ Dockets Act of 2025 — Short Title(s) as Introduced
- To authorize additional district judges for the district court for the eastern district of California. — Official Title as Introduced
Lobbying
1 client hired 1 firm and 1 registered lobbyist who named H.R. 1856 in 1 quarterly filing, 2025. Reported under the Lobbying Disclosure Act; a filing’s income covers everything its registrant worked that quarter, so the amounts below are the filings’, not this bill’s.
Filed under Communications/Broadcasting/Radio/TV, Copyright/Patent/Trademark, Consumer Issues/Safety/Products, Media (information/publishing), Taxation/Internal Revenue Code, Telecommunications.
Clients
Who paid to be heard, by how many filings named the bill.
| Client | Business | State | Firms | Filings | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DIRECTV, LLC | Multi-channel video programming distributor | California | 1 | 1 | — |
Firms
Registrants who filed on the bill, by filings.
| Registrant | Clients | Filings | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| DIRECTV, LLC | 1 | 1 | — |
Lobbyists
Named on the filings that cite the bill.
| Lobbyist | Firms | Clients | Filings |
|---|---|---|---|
| J. WALSH | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Filings
The documents themselves, on the Senate’s Lobbying Disclosure site, largest reported first.
| Client | Registrant | Period | Reported | Document |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DIRECTV, LLC | DIRECTV, LLC | 2025 first_quarter | $380K | 1st Quarter - Report |
Classification
The Congressional Research Service files H.R. 1856 under Law, one of its 31 policy areas, and gives it 3 legislative subjects.
CRS Subjects
CRS assigns every bill one policy area from its 31; H.R. 1856’s is Law.
hr1856/policy-areas.txtLegislative Subjects
H.R. 1856 carries 3 of CRS’s legislative subjects, from California to Judges.
hr1856/subjects.txtConstitutional authority
The clause the sponsor cites as Congress’s power to enact H.R. 1856, as entered in the Congressional Record.
[Congressional Record Volume 171, Number 42 (Wednesday, March 5, 2025)][House]From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]By Mr. COSTA:H.R. 1856.Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuantto the following:Article 1, Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution[Page H1010]
Source: congress.gov · legiscan.com