Search

Search bills, members, committees and pages...

H.R. 1856

U.S. HouseIn House Committee

Summary

H.R. 1856, the CASE LOAD Act of 2025, was introduced in the House on Mar 5, 2025 by Rep. Jim Costa (D) with 1 co-sponsor. It was referred to Judiciary, and last saw action on Mar 5, 2025: Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.


Record

Text

H.R. 1856 has 1 co-sponsor.

hb1856/introduced-in-house.txt
119 HR 1856 IH: Creating Additional Seats to Ease Legally Overburdened Adjudicators’ Dockets Act of 2025
U.S. House of Representatives
2025-03-05
text/xml
EN
Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.
I 119th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 1856 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES March 5, 2025 Mr. Costa (for himself and Mr. Obernolte ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary A BILL
To authorize additional district judges for the district court for the eastern district of California.
1.
Short title
This Act may be cited as the Creating Additional Seats to Ease Legally Overburdened Adjudicators’ Dockets Act of 2025 or the CASE LOAD Act of 2025 .
2.
Findings
Congress finds the following:
(1)
The Federal district court for the eastern district of California is the Federal trial court for 34 counties, including five of the fastest-growing cities in the State of California, serving a population of approximately 8,400,000.
(2)
The Federal district court for the eastern district of California is one of the largest judicial districts in the country, with approximately 8,400,000 residents and over 87,000 square miles of land. Yet, there are only six permanent judgeships, with one upcoming vacancy pending a nomination elevating a sitting district judge.
(3)
Based on the 2019 U.S. census data, the ratio of authorized district judgeships to population was 1:1,362,552. The central district of California has the next highest ratio in the State, nearly half the size, with 1:694,323.
(4)
As of June 2022, the total pending cases per judgeship in the Federal district court for the eastern district of California was 1,308, over 2.6 times larger than the average for all districts within the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Pending caseloads remain high, and if a new vacancy opens upon the elevation of the district judge, caseloads will once again reach this unsustainable level.
3.
Additional district judges for the eastern district of California
(a)
2027
(1)
Additional judgeships
On or after January 21, 2027, the President shall appoint, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, 2 additional district judges for the eastern district of California.
(2)
Clerical amendment
The table contained in section 133(a) of title 28, United States Code, is amended by striking the items relating to California and inserting the following:
California:
Northern 14
Eastern 8
Central 27
Southern 13 .
(3)
Effective date
The amendment made by paragraph (2) shall take effect on January 20, 2027.
(b)
2029
(1)
Additional judgeships
On or after January 5, 2029, the President shall appoint, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, 1 additional district judge for the eastern district of California.
(2)
Clerical amendment
The table contained in section 133(a) of title 28, United States Code, is amended by striking the items relating to California and inserting the following:
California: Northern 14 Eastern 9 Central 27 Southern 13 .
(3)
Effective date
The amendment made by paragraph (2) shall take effect on January 4, 2029.
(c)
2031
(1)
Additional judgeships
On or after January 21, 2031, the President shall appoint, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, 2 additional district judges for the eastern district of California.
(2)
Clerical amendment
The table contained in section 133(a) of title 28, United States Code, is amended by striking the items relating to California and inserting the following:
California:
Northern 14
Eastern 11
Central 27
Southern 13 .
(3)
Effective date
The amendment made by paragraph (2) shall take effect on January 20, 2031.
4.
Authorization of appropriations
There are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be necessary to carry out this Act and the amendments made by this Act, including such sums as may be necessary to provide appropriate space and facilities for the judicial positions created by this Act or an amendment made by this Act.

Tracker

The tracker indicates the progress of this legislation as it moves through the legislative process.

  1. Introduced2025-03-05
  2. Passed House
  3. Passed Senate
  4. Conference
  5. To President
  6. Became Law

To authorize additional district judges for the district court for the eastern district of California.

Sponsors

Rep. Jim Costa (D) sponsors H.R. 1856, and 1 member has co-sponsored it from the day it was introduced.

Committees

H.R. 1856 went before 1 committee: Judiciary.

Judiciary
Judiciary
Referred To · Mar 5, 2025 · 2,181 Bills

Actions

H.R. 1856 has taken 2 actions since Mar 5, 2025.

ChamberAction
Mar 5, 2025
House
Introduced in House
Mar 5, 2025
House
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.Judiciary Committee

Votes

H.R. 1856 has not gone to a roll call.

Titles

H.R. 1856 goes by 4 titles, 2 of them short titles.

  • CASE LOAD Act of 2025 — Display Title
  • CASE LOAD Act of 2025 — Short Title(s) as Introduced
  • Creating Additional Seats to Ease Legally Overburdened Adjudicators’ Dockets Act of 2025 — Short Title(s) as Introduced
  • To authorize additional district judges for the district court for the eastern district of California. — Official Title as Introduced

Lobbying

1 client hired 1 firm and 1 registered lobbyist who named H.R. 1856 in 1 quarterly filing, 2025. Reported under the Lobbying Disclosure Act; a filing’s income covers everything its registrant worked that quarter, so the amounts below are the filings’, not this bill’s.

Filed under Communications/Broadcasting/Radio/TV, Copyright/Patent/Trademark, Consumer Issues/Safety/Products, Media (information/publishing), Taxation/Internal Revenue Code, Telecommunications.

Clients

Who paid to be heard, by how many filings named the bill.

ClientBusinessStateFirmsFilingsReported
DIRECTV, LLCMulti-channel video programming distributorCalifornia11

Firms

Registrants who filed on the bill, by filings.

RegistrantClientsFilingsReported
DIRECTV, LLC11

Lobbyists

Named on the filings that cite the bill.

LobbyistFirmsClientsFilings
J. WALSH111

Filings

The documents themselves, on the Senate’s Lobbying Disclosure site, largest reported first.

ClientRegistrantPeriodReportedDocument
DIRECTV, LLCDIRECTV, LLC2025 first_quarter$380K1st Quarter - Report

Classification

The Congressional Research Service files H.R. 1856 under Law, one of its 31 policy areas, and gives it 3 legislative subjects.

CRS Subjects

CRS assigns every bill one policy area from its 31; H.R. 1856’s is Law.

hr1856/policy-areas.txt
LawAgriculture and FoodAnimalsArmed Forces and National SecurityArts, Culture, ReligionCivil Rights and Liberties, Minority IssuesCommerceCongressCrime and Law EnforcementEconomics and Public FinanceEducationEmergency ManagementEnergyEnvironmental ProtectionFamiliesFinance and Financial SectorForeign Trade and International FinanceGovernment Operations and PoliticsHealthHousing and Community DevelopmentImmigrationInternational AffairsLabor and EmploymentNative AmericansPublic Lands and Natural ResourcesScience, Technology, CommunicationsSocial WelfareSports and RecreationTaxationTransportation and Public WorksWater Resources Development

Legislative Subjects

H.R. 1856 carries 3 of CRS’s legislative subjects, from California to Judges.

hr1856/subjects.txt
CaliforniaFederal district courtsJudges

Constitutional authority

The clause the sponsor cites as Congress’s power to enact H.R. 1856, as entered in the Congressional Record.

[Congressional Record Volume 171, Number 42 (Wednesday, March 5, 2025)][House]From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]By Mr. COSTA:H.R. 1856.Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuantto the following:Article 1, Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution[Page H1010]

Source: congress.gov · legiscan.com