- H.R. 10171August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10156August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10172August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10160August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10181August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10176August 27, 2026
- H.Res. 1496August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10164August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10170August 27, 2026
- H.Res. 1494August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10163August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10157August 27, 2026
- Administration
- Agriculture
- Agriculture, Nutrition, And Forestry
- Appropriations
- Armed Services
- Banking, Housing, And Urban Affairs
- Budget
- Commerce, Science, And Transportation
- Education and Workforce
- Energy And Commerce
- Energy And Natural Resources
- Environment And Public Works
- Ethics
- Finance
- Financial Services
- Foreign Affairs
- Foreign Relations
- Health, Education, Labor, And Pensions
- Homeland Security
- Homeland Security And Governmental Affa…
- Indian Affairs
- Indian and Insular Affairs
- Intelligence
- Judiciary
- Natural Resources
- Oversight And Government Reform
- Permanent Select Intelligence
- Rules
- Rules And Administration
- Science, Space, And Technology
- Select Intelligence
- Small Business
- Small Business And Entrepreneurship
- Subcommittee on Aviation
- Subcommittee on Border Security and Enf…
- Subcommittee on Coast Guard and Maritim…
- Subcommittee on Commodity Markets, Digi…
- Subcommittee on Conservation, Research,…
- Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and In…
- Subcommittee on Cybersecurity and Infra…
- Subcommittee on Disability Assistance a…
- Subcommittee on Economic Development, P…
- Subcommittee on Economic Opportunity
- Subcommittee on Emergency Management an…
- Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Reso…
- Subcommittee on Federal Lands
- Subcommittee on Forestry and Horticultu…
- Subcommittee on General Farm Commoditie…
- Subcommittee on Health
- Subcommittee on Highways and Transit
- Subcommittee on Livestock, Dairy, and P…
- Subcommittee on Nutrition and Foreign A…
- Subcommittee on Oversight and Investiga…
- Subcommittee on Oversight, Investigatio…
- Subcommittee on Railroads, Pipelines, a…
- Subcommittee on Transportation and Mari…
- Subcommittee on Water Resources and Env…
- Subcommittee on Water, Wildlife and Fis…
- Transportation And Infrastructure
- Veterans' Affairs
- Ways And Means

H.R. 1777
U.S. House•In House Committee
Summary
H.R. 1777, the SECURE Notarization Act of 2025, was introduced in the House on Mar 3, 2025 by Rep. Cliff Bentz (R) with 8 co-sponsors. It was referred to Energy And Commerce, and last saw action on Mar 3, 2025: Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Record
Text
H.R. 1777 has 8 co-sponsors.
hb1777/introduced-in-house.txt119 HR 1777 IH: Securing and Enabling Commerce Using Remote and Electronic Notarization Act of 2025U.S. House of Representatives2025-03-03text/xmlENPursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.I 119th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 1777 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES March 3, 2025 Mr. Bentz (for himself, Ms. Dean of Pennsylvania , and Ms. Fedorchak ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce , and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary , for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned A BILLTo authorize notaries public to perform, and to establish minimum standards for, electronic notarizations and remote notarizations that occur in or affect interstate commerce, to require any Federal court to recognize notarizations performed by a notarial officer of any State, to require any State to recognize notarizations performed by a notarial officer of any other State when the notarization was performed under or relates to a public Act, record, or judicial proceeding of the notarial officer’s State or when the notarization occurs in or affects interstate commerce, and for other purposes.1.Short titleThis Act may be cited as the Securing and Enabling Commerce Using Remote and Electronic Notarization Act of 2025 or the SECURE Notarization Act of 2025 .2.DefinitionsIn this Act:(1)Communication technologyThe term communication technology , with respect to a notarization, means an electronic device or process that allows the notary public performing the notarization, a remotely located individual, and (if applicable) a credible witness to communicate with each other simultaneously by sight and sound during the notarization.(2)Electronic; electronic record; electronic signature; information; person; recordThe terms electronic , electronic record , electronic signature , information , person , and record have the meanings given those terms in section 106 of the Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act ( 15 U.S.C. 7006 ).(3)LawThe term law includes any statute, regulation, rule, or rule of law.(4)Notarial officerThe term notarial officer means—(A)a notary public; or(B)any other individual authorized to perform a notarization under the laws of a State without a commission or appointment as a notary public.(5)Notarial officer’s State; notary public’s StateThe term notarial officer’s State or notary public’s State means the State in which a notarial officer, or a notary public, as applicable, is authorized to perform a notarization.(6)NotarizationThe term notarization —(A)means any act that a notarial officer may perform under—(i)Federal law, including this Act; or(ii)the laws of the notarial officer's State; and(B)includes any act described in subparagraph (A) and performed by a notarial officer—(i)with respect to—(I)a tangible record; or(II)an electronic record; and(ii)for—(I)an individual in the physical presence of the notarial officer; or(II)a remotely located individual.(7)Notary publicThe term notary public means an individual commissioned or appointed as a notary public to perform a notarization under the laws of a State.(8)Personal knowledgeThe term personal knowledge , with respect to the identity of an individual, means knowledge of the identity of the individual through dealings sufficient to provide reasonable certainty that the individual has the identity claimed.(9)Remotely located individualThe term remotely located individual , with respect to a notarization, means an individual who is not in the physical presence of the notarial officer performing the notarization.(10)RequirementThe term requirement includes a duty, a standard of care, and a prohibition.(11)SignatureThe term signature means—(A)an electronic signature; or(B)a tangible symbol executed or adopted by a person and evidencing the present intent to authenticate or adopt a record.(12)SimultaneouslyThe term simultaneously , with respect to a communication between parties—(A)means that each party communicates substantially simultaneously and without unreasonable interruption or disconnection; and(B)includes any reasonably short delay that is inherent in, or common with respect to, the method used for the communication.(13)StateThe term State —(A)means—(i)any State of the United States;(ii)the District of Columbia;(iii)the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico;(iv)any territory or possession of the United States; and(v)any federally recognized Indian Tribe; and(B)includes any executive, legislative, or judicial agency, court, department, board, office, clerk, recorder, register, registrar, commission, authority, institution, instrumentality, county, municipality, or other political subdivision of an entity described in any of clauses (i) through (v) of subparagraph (A).3.Authorization to perform and minimum standards for electronic notarization(a)AuthorizationUnless prohibited under section 10, and subject to subsection (b), a notary public may perform a notarization that occurs in or affects interstate commerce with respect to an electronic record.(b)Requirements of electronic notarizationIf a notary public performs a notarization under subsection (a), the following requirements shall apply with respect to the notarization:(1)The electronic signature of the notary public, and all other information required to be included under other applicable law, shall be attached to or logically associated with the electronic record.(2)The electronic signature and other information described in paragraph (1) shall be bound to the electronic record in a manner that renders any subsequent change or modification to the electronic record evident.4.Authorization to perform and minimum standards for remote notarization(a)AuthorizationUnless prohibited under section 10, and subject to subsection (b), a notary public may perform a notarization that occurs in or affects interstate commerce for a remotely located individual.(b)Requirements of remote notarizationIf a notary public performs a notarization under subsection (a), the following requirements shall apply with respect to the notarization:(1)The remotely located individual shall appear personally before the notary public at the time of the notarization by using communication technology.(2)The notary public shall—(A)reasonably identify the remotely located individual—(i)through personal knowledge of the identity of the remotely located individual; or(ii)by obtaining satisfactory evidence of the identity of the remotely located individual by—(I)using not fewer than 2 distinct types of processes or services through which a third person provides a means to verify the identity of the remotely located individual through a review of public or private data sources; or(II)oath or affirmation of a credible witness who—(aa)(AA)is in the physical presence of the notary public or the remotely located individual; or(BB)appears personally before the notary public and the remotely located individual by using communication technology;(bb)has personal knowledge of the identity of the remotely located individual; and(cc)has been identified by the notary public in the same manner as specified for identification of a remotely located individual under clause (i) or subclause (I) of this clause;(B)either directly or through an agent—(i)create an audio and visual recording of the performance of the notarization; and(ii)notwithstanding any resignation from, or revocation, suspension, or termination of, the notary public’s commission or appointment, retain the recording created under clause (i) as a notarial record—(I)for a period of not less than—(aa)if an applicable law of the notary public’s State specifies a period of retention, the greater of—(AA)that specified period; or(BB)5 years after the date on which the recording is created; or(bb)if no applicable law of the notary public’s State specifies a period of retention, 10 years after the date on which the recording is created; and(II)if any applicable law of the notary public’s State governs the content, manner or place of retention, security, use, effect, or disclosure of the recording or any information contained in the recording, in accordance with that law; and(C)if the notarization is performed with respect to a tangible or electronic record, take reasonable steps to confirm that the record before the notary public is the same record with respect to which the remotely located individual made a statement or on which the individual executed a signature.(3)If a guardian, conservator, executor, personal representative, administrator, or similar fiduciary or successor is appointed for or on behalf of a notary public or a deceased notary public under applicable law, that person shall retain the recording under paragraph (2)(B)(ii), unless—(A)another person is obligated to retain the recording under applicable law of the notary public’s State; or(B)(i)under applicable law of the notary public’s State, that person may transmit the recording to an office, archive, or repository approved or designated by the State; and(ii)that person transmits the recording to the office, archive, or repository described in clause (i) in accordance with applicable law of the notary public’s State.(4)If the remotely located individual is physically located outside the geographic boundaries of a State, or is otherwise physically located in a location that is not subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, at the time of the notarization—(A)the record shall—(i)be intended for filing with, or relate to a matter before, a court, governmental entity, public official, or other entity that is subject to the jurisdiction of the United States; or(ii)involve property located in the territorial jurisdiction of the United States or a transaction substantially connected to the United States; and(B)the act of making the statement or signing the record may not be prohibited by a law of the jurisdiction in which the individual is physically located.(c)Personal appearance satisfiedIf a State or Federal law requires an individual to appear personally before or be in the physical presence of a notary public at the time of a notarization, that requirement shall be considered to be satisfied if—(1)the individual—(A)is a remotely located individual; and(B)appears personally before the notary public at the time of the notarization by using communication technology; and(2)(A)the notarization was performed under or relates to a public act, record, or judicial proceeding of the notary public’s State; or(B)the notarization occurs in or affects interstate commerce.5.Recognition of notarizations in Federal court(a)Recognition of validityEach court of the United States shall recognize as valid under the State or Federal law applicable in a judicial proceeding before the court any notarization performed by a notarial officer of any State if the notarization is valid under the laws of the notarial officer’s State or under this Act.(b)Legal effect of recognized notarizationA notarization recognized under subsection (a) shall have the same effect under the State or Federal law applicable in the applicable judicial proceeding as if that notarization was validly performed—(1)(A)by a notarial officer of the State, the law of which is applicable in the proceeding; or(B)under this Act or other Federal law; and(2)without regard to whether the notarization was performed—(A)with respect to—(i)a tangible record; or(ii)an electronic record; or(B)for—(i)an individual in the physical presence of the notarial officer; or(ii)a remotely located individual.(c)Presumption of genuinenessIn a determination of the validity of a notarization for the purposes of subsection (a), the signature and title of an individual performing the notarization shall be prima facie evidence in any court of the United States that the signature of the individual is genuine and that the individual holds the designated title.(d)Conclusive evidence of authorityIn a determination of the validity of a notarization for the purposes of subsection (a), the signature and title of the following notarial officers of a State shall conclusively establish the authority of the officer to perform the notarization:(1)A notary public of that State.(2)A judge, clerk, or deputy clerk of a court of that State.6.Recognition by State of notarizations performed under authority of another State(a)Recognition of validityEach State shall recognize as valid under the laws of that State any notarization performed by a notarial officer of any other State if—(1)the notarization is valid under the laws of the notarial officer’s State or under this Act; and(2)(A)the notarization was performed under or relates to a public act, record, or judicial proceeding of the notarial officer’s State; or(B)the notarization occurs in or affects interstate commerce.(b)Legal effect of recognized notarizationA notarization recognized under subsection (a) shall have the same effect under the laws of the recognizing State as if that notarization was validly performed by a notarial officer of the recognizing State, without regard to whether the notarization was performed—(1)with respect to—(A)a tangible record; or(B)an electronic record; or(2)for—(A)an individual in the physical presence of the notarial officer; or(B)a remotely located individual.(c)Presumption of genuinenessIn a determination of the validity of a notarization for the purposes of subsection (a), the signature and title of an individual performing a notarization shall be prima facie evidence in any State court or judicial proceeding that the signature is genuine and that the individual holds the designated title.(d)Conclusive evidence of authorityIn a determination of the validity of a notarization for the purposes of subsection (a), the signature and title of the following notarial officers of a State shall conclusively establish the authority of the officer to perform the notarization:(1)A notary public of that State.(2)A judge, clerk, or deputy clerk of a court of that State.7.Electronic and remote notarization not requiredNothing in this Act may be construed to require a notary public to perform a notarization—(1)with respect to an electronic record;(2)for a remotely located individual; or(3)using a technology that the notary public has not selected.8.Validity of notarizations; rights of aggrieved persons not affected; State laws on the practice of law not affected(a)Validity not affectedThe failure of a notary public to meet a requirement under section 3 or 4 in the performance of a notarization, or the failure of a notarization to conform to a requirement under section 3 or 4, shall not invalidate or impair the validity or recognition of the notarization.(b)Rights of aggrieved personsThe validity and recognition of a notarization under this Act may not be construed to prevent an aggrieved person from seeking to invalidate a record or transaction that is the subject of a notarization or from seeking other remedies based on State or Federal law other than this Act for any reason not specified in this Act, including on the basis—(1)that a person did not, with present intent to authenticate or adopt a record, execute a signature on the record;(2)that an individual was incompetent, lacked authority or capacity to authenticate or adopt a record, or did not knowingly and voluntarily authenticate or adopt a record; or(3)of fraud, forgery, mistake, misrepresentation, impersonation, duress, undue influence, or other invalidating cause.(c)Rule of constructionNothing in this Act may be construed to affect a State law governing, authorizing, or prohibiting the practice of law.9.Exception to preemption(a)In generalA State law may modify, limit, or supersede the provisions of section 3, or subsection (a) or (b) of section 4, with respect to State law only if that State law—(1)either—(A)constitutes an enactment or adoption of the Revised Uniform Law on Notarial Acts, as approved and recommended for enactment in all the States by the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws in 2018 or the Revised Uniform Law on Notarial Acts, as approved and recommended for enactment in all the States by the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws in 2021, except that a modification to such Law enacted or adopted by a State shall be preempted to the extent such modification—(i)is inconsistent with a provision of section 3 or subsection (a) or (b) of section 4, as applicable; or(ii)would not be permitted under subparagraph (B); or(B)specifies additional or alternative procedures or requirements for the performance of notarizations with respect to electronic records or for remotely located individuals, if those additional or alternative procedures or requirements—(i)are consistent with section 3 and subsections (a) and (b) of section 4; and(ii)do not accord greater legal effect to the implementation or application of a specific technology or technical specification for performing those notarizations; and(2)requires the retention of an audio and visual recording of the performance of a notarization for a remotely located individual for a period of not less than 5 years after the recording is created.(b)Rule of constructionNothing in section 5 or 6 may be construed to preclude the recognition of a notarization under applicable State law, regardless of whether such State law is consistent with section 5 or 6.10.Standard of care; special notarial commissions; false advertising(a)State standards of care; authority of State regulatory officialsNothing in this Act may be construed to prevent a State, or a notarial regulatory official of a State, from—(1)adopting a requirement in this Act as a duty or standard of care under the laws of that State or sanctioning a notary public for breach of such a duty or standard of care;(2)establishing requirements and qualifications for, or denying, refusing to renew, revoking, suspending, or imposing a condition on, a commission or appointment as a notary public;(3)creating or designating a class or type of commission or appointment, or requiring an endorsement or other authorization to be received by a notary public, as a condition on the authority to perform notarizations with respect to electronic records or for remotely located individuals; or(4)prohibiting a notary public from performing a notarization under section 3 or 4 as a sanction for a breach of duty or standard of care or for official misconduct.(b)Special commissions or authorizations created by a State; sanction for breach or official misconduct; false advertisingA notary public may not perform a notarization under section 3 or 4 if any of the following applies:(1)The notary public’s State has enacted a law that creates or designates a class or type of commission or appointment, or requires an endorsement or other authorization to be received by a notary public, as a condition on the authority to perform notarizations with respect to electronic records or for remotely located individuals, and—(A)the commission or appointment of the notary public is not of that class or type; or(B)the notary public has not received the endorsement or other authorization.(2)The notarial regulatory official of the notary public’s State has prohibited the notary public from performing the notarization as a sanction for a breach of duty or standard of care or for official misconduct.(3)(A)The notary public has engaged in false or deceptive advertising.(B)For the purposes of subparagraph (A), a notary public shall be considered to have engaged in false or deceptive advertising if the notary public (unless the notary public is an attorney licensed to practice law in a State)—(i)uses the term notario or notario publico ; or(ii)states or represents in a record offering commercial notarial services that the notary public is authorized to—(I)assist in drafting legal records, give legal advice, or otherwise practice law;(II)act as an immigration consultant or an expert on matters pertaining to immigration;(III)represent a person in a judicial or administrative proceeding relating to immigration to the United States, United States citizenship, or related matters; or(IV)receive compensation for performing any activity described in this subparagraph.(C)For the purposes of a notarization performed by a notary public under section 4 for a remotely located individual, if a record executed by the remotely located individual attests that the notary public disclosed to the individual the prohibitions under this paragraph, and that the notary public did not make any statement or representation in violation of this paragraph, that record shall conclusively establish compliance by the notary public with the requirements of this paragraph, as of the date on which the individual executes that record.11.SeverabilityIf any provision of this Act or the application of such provision to any person or circumstance is held to be invalid or unconstitutional, the remainder of this Act and the application of the provisions thereof to other persons or circumstances shall not be affected by that holding.
Tracker
The tracker indicates the progress of this legislation as it moves through the legislative process.
- Introduced2025-03-03
- Passed House
- Passed Senate
- Conference
- To President
- Became Law
CRS Summary
The summaries are the Congressional Research Service’s, one per stage. Read them in full.
Introduced in House Mar 3, 2025
hb1777/introduced-in-house.mdShown Here:
Introduced in House (03/03/2025)
Securing and Enabling Commerce Using Remote and Electronic Notarization Act of 2025 or the SECURE Notarization Act of 2025
This bill allows a notary public commissioned under state law to remotely notarize electronic records and perform notarizations for remotely located individuals. The bill provides technical requirements for the notarizations, including the creation and retention of video and audio recordings and the use of communication technologies (i.e., video chat).
Additionally, the bill requires U.S. courts and states to recognize notarizations—including remote notarizations of electronic records and notarizations of remotely-located individuals—that occur in or affect interstate commerce and are performed by a notary public commissioned under the laws of other states.
The bill also allows a notary public to remotely notarize electronic records involving an individual located outside of the United States, subject to certain requirements.
Sponsors
Rep. Cliff Bentz (R) sponsors H.R. 1777, and 8 members have co-sponsored it, 2 of them from the day it was introduced.

Rep. · R–OR-2 · Sponsor
Introduced Mar 3, 2025

Rep. · D–PA-4 · Co-sponsor
Joined Mar 3, 2025 · Original

Rep. · R–ND-0 · Co-sponsor
Joined Mar 3, 2025 · Original

Rep. · R–VA-9 · Co-sponsor
Joined Mar 4, 2025

Rep. · D–NY-7 · Co-sponsor
Joined May 7, 2025

Rep. · R–TN-8 · Co-sponsor
Joined May 20, 2025

Rep. · D–CO-2 · Co-sponsor
Joined May 20, 2025

Rep. · D–WA-1 · Co-sponsor
Joined Jun 11, 2025

Rep. · D–DE-0 · Co-sponsor
Joined Jul 21, 2025
Committees
H.R. 1777 went before 2 committees: Judiciary and Energy and Commerce.
Actions
H.R. 1777 has taken 2 actions since Mar 3, 2025.
| Chamber | Action | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Mar 3, 2025 | House | Introduced in House | ||
Mar 3, 2025 | House | Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.Energy and Commerce Committee |
Votes
H.R. 1777 has not gone to a roll call.
Related bills
1 bill is related to H.R. 1777, as Identical bill.
Titles
H.R. 1777 goes by 4 titles, 2 of them short titles.
- SECURE Notarization Act of 2025 — Display Title
- SECURE Notarization Act of 2025 — Short Title(s) as Introduced
- Securing and Enabling Commerce Using Remote and Electronic Notarization Act of 2025 — Short Title(s) as Introduced
- To authorize notaries public to perform, and to establish minimum standards for, electronic notarizations and remote notarizations that occur in or affect interstate commerce, to require any Federal court to recognize notarizations performed by a notarial officer of any State, to require any State to recognize notarizations performed by a notarial officer of any other State when the notarization was performed under or relates to a public Act, record, or judicial proceeding of the notarial officer's State or when the notarization occurs in or affects interstate commerce, and for other purposes. — Official Title as Introduced
Lobbying
23 clients hired 25 firms and 181 registered lobbyists who named H.R. 1777 in 115 quarterly filings, 2025 to 2026. Reported under the Lobbying Disclosure Act; a filing’s income covers everything its registrant worked that quarter, so the amounts below are the filings’, not this bill’s.
Filed under Taxation/Internal Revenue Code, Financial Institutions/Investments/Securities, Consumer Issues/Safety/Products, Insurance, Housing, Retirement, Budget/Appropriations, Trade (domestic/foreign).
Clients
Who paid to be heard, by how many filings named the bill. The 20 that filed most often, of 23.
| Client | Business | State | Firms | Filings | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION | ​Trade Association representing title insurance companies. | District of Columbia | 2 | 13 | $200K |
| NOTARIZE, INC. DBA PROOF.COM | Platform company that facilitates documents being legally notarized online, 24/7. | Massachusetts | 2 | 10 | $250K |
| ROCKET LP FKA RKT HOLDINGS | Mortgage, real estate, business services | Michigan | 1 | 8 | — |
| AMERICAN COUNCIL OF LIFE INSURERS | — | District of Columbia | 1 | 7 | — |
| HOUSING POLICY COUNCIL | Non-profit advocacy organization for companies in the mortgage & housing industries. | District of Columbia | 1 | 6 | $360K |
| CARVANA | auto sales and ecommerce | Arizona | 1 | 6 | $300K |
| WORLDWIDE ERC, INC. | global mobility trade association | District of Columbia | 1 | 6 | $100K |
| AMERIPRISE FINANCIAL, INC. | — | District of Columbia | 1 | 6 | — |
| CMFG LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY | — | Wisconsin | 1 | 6 | — |
| CREDIT UNION NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, INC. DBA AMERICA'S CREDIT UNIONS | — | District of Columbia | 1 | 6 | — |
| FINSECA | — | District of Columbia | 1 | 6 | — |
| PACIFIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY | — | California | 1 | 6 | — |
| TRANSAMERICA COMPANIES | — | District of Columbia | 1 | 6 | — |
| MORTGAGE BANKERS ASSOCIATION | — | District of Columbia | 1 | 5 | — |
| INSURED RETIREMENT INSTITUTE | — | District of Columbia | 1 | 4 | — |
| NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS | — | District of Columbia | 1 | 4 | — |
| WORLDWIDE ERC | — | Virginia | 1 | 3 | — |
| NCTA - THE INTERNET & TELEVISION ASSOCIATION | — | District of Columbia | 1 | 2 | — |
| FIRST AMERICAN FINANCIAL CORPORATION | — | District of Columbia | 1 | 1 | — |
| INDEPENDENT COMMUNITY BANKERS OF AMERICA | — | District of Columbia | 1 | 1 | — |
Firms
Registrants who filed on the bill, by filings.
Lobbyists
Named on the filings that cite the bill. The 20 named most often, of 181.
| Lobbyist | Firms | Clients | Filings |
|---|---|---|---|
| ETHAN FRESHWATER | 1 | 1 | 8 |
| HILARY HALPERN | 1 | 1 | 8 |
| MEGAN HANSEN | 1 | 1 | 8 |
| ANDREW REMO | 1 | 1 | 7 |
| CHRISTOPHER MORTON | 1 | 1 | 7 |
| DOUGLAS LATHROP | 1 | 1 | 7 |
| ELIZABETH BLOSSER | 1 | 1 | 7 |
| EMILY TRYON | 1 | 1 | 7 |
| IAN STEGER | 1 | 1 | 7 |
| JEFFRY JANOSKA | 1 | 1 | 7 |
| KEVIN CAMERON | 1 | 1 | 7 |
| LAURYL JACKSON | 1 | 1 | 7 |
| PAUL KANGAS | 1 | 1 | 7 |
| STEVE GOTTHEIM | 1 | 1 | 7 |
| ALANE DENT | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| ALISSA CLEES | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| ANDREW MORRIS | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| ASHLI SCOTT PALMER | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| BERT CARP | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| BRADFORD THALER | 1 | 1 | 6 |
Filings
The documents themselves, on the Senate’s Lobbying Disclosure site, largest reported first.
| Client | Registrant | Period | Reported | Document |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS | NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS | 2025 fourth_quarter | $15.9M | 4th Quarter - Report |
| NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS | NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS | 2026 first_quarter | $15.5M | 1st Quarter - Report |
| NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS | NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS | 2026 second_quarter | $14.6M | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS | NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS | 2025 third_quarter | $11M | 3rd Quarter - Report |
| NCTA - THE INTERNET & TELEVISION ASSOCIATION | NCTA - THE INTERNET & TELEVISION ASSOCIATION | 2025 first_quarter | $3.2M | 1st Quarter - Report |
| NCTA - THE INTERNET & TELEVISION ASSOCIATION | NCTA - THE INTERNET & TELEVISION ASSOCIATION | 2025 second_quarter | $3.1M | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| INDEPENDENT COMMUNITY BANKERS OF AMERICA | INDEPENDENT COMMUNITY BANKERS OF AMERICA | 2025 second_quarter | $2.7M | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| AMERICAN COUNCIL OF LIFE INSURERS | AMERICAN COUNCIL OF LIFE INSURERS | 2025 second_quarter | $2.2M | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| AMERICAN COUNCIL OF LIFE INSURERS | AMERICAN COUNCIL OF LIFE INSURERS | 2025 fourth_quarter | $1.9M | 4th Quarter - Report |
| NATIONAL MULTIFAMILY HOUSING COUNCIL INC | NATIONAL MULTIFAMILY HOUSING COUNCIL, INC. | 2025 first_quarter | $1.8M | 1st Quarter - Report |
| AMERICAN COUNCIL OF LIFE INSURERS | AMERICAN COUNCIL OF LIFE INSURERS | 2025 first_quarter | $1.7M | 1st Quarter - Report |
| AMERICAN COUNCIL OF LIFE INSURERS | AMERICAN COUNCIL OF LIFE INSURERS | 2025 third_quarter | $1.4M | 3rd Quarter - Report |
| CREDIT UNION NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, INC. DBA AMERICA'S CREDIT UNIONS | CREDIT UNION NATIONAL ASSOCIATION. INC. DBA AMERICA'S CREDIT UNIONS | 2026 second_quarter | $1.3M | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| CREDIT UNION NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, INC. DBA AMERICA'S CREDIT UNIONS | CREDIT UNION NATIONAL ASSOCIATION. INC. DBA AMERICA'S CREDIT UNIONS | 2025 first_quarter | $1.2M | 1st Quarter - Report |
| CREDIT UNION NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, INC. DBA AMERICA'S CREDIT UNIONS | CREDIT UNION NATIONAL ASSOCIATION. INC. DBA AMERICA'S CREDIT UNIONS | 2025 second_quarter | $1.2M | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| CREDIT UNION NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, INC. DBA AMERICA'S CREDIT UNIONS | CREDIT UNION NATIONAL ASSOCIATION. INC. DBA AMERICA'S CREDIT UNIONS | 2026 first_quarter | $1.1M | 1st Quarter - Report |
| AMERICAN COUNCIL OF LIFE INSURERS | AMERICAN COUNCIL OF LIFE INSURERS | 2026 first_quarter | $1.1M | 1st Quarter - Report |
| AMERICAN COUNCIL OF LIFE INSURERS | AMERICAN COUNCIL OF LIFE INSURERS | 2026 second_quarter | $1.1M | 2nd Quarter - Amendme… |
| AMERICAN COUNCIL OF LIFE INSURERS | AMERICAN COUNCIL OF LIFE INSURERS | 2026 second_quarter | $1.1M | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| CREDIT UNION NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, INC. DBA AMERICA'S CREDIT UNIONS | CREDIT UNION NATIONAL ASSOCIATION. INC. DBA AMERICA'S CREDIT UNIONS | 2025 third_quarter | $1.1M | 3rd Quarter - Report |
Classification
The Congressional Research Service files H.R. 1777 under Law, one of its 31 policy areas, and gives it 8 legislative subjects.
CRS Subjects
CRS assigns every bill one policy area from its 31; H.R. 1777’s is Law.
hr1777/policy-areas.txtLegislative Subjects
H.R. 1777 carries 8 of CRS’s legislative subjects, from Computers and information technology to State and local government operations.
hr1777/subjects.txtConstitutional authority
The clause the sponsor cites as Congress’s power to enact H.R. 1777, as entered in the Congressional Record.
[Congressional Record Volume 171, Number 40 (Monday, March 3, 2025)][House]From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]By Mr. BENTZ:H.R. 1777.Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuantto the following:Article I, Section 8, Clause 18[Page H946]
Source: congress.gov · legiscan.com
