Search

Search bills, members, committees and pages...

H.R. 1742

U.S. HouseIntroduced

Summary

H.R. 1742, the Access to Reproductive Care for Servicemembers Act, was introduced in the House on Feb 27, 2025 by Rep. Rebecca Sherrill (D) with 80 co-sponsors. It last saw action on Feb 11, 2026: ASSUMING FIRST SPONSORSHIP - Ms. Houlahan asked unanimous consent that she may hereafter be considered as the first sponsor of H.R. 1742, a bill originally introduced by Representative Sherrill, for the purpose of adding cosponsors and requesting reprintings pursuant to clause 7 of rule XII. Agreed to without objection.


Record

Text

H.R. 1742 has 80 co-sponsors.

hb1742/introduced-in-house.txt
119 HR 1742 IH: Access to Reproductive Care for Servicemembers Act
U.S. House of Representatives
2025-02-27
text/xml
EN
Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.
I 119th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 1742 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES February 27, 2025 Ms. Sherrill (for herself, Ms. Houlahan , Ms. Escobar , Mr. Crow , Ms. Sewell , Mr. Carbajal , Mr. Carter of Louisiana , Mrs. Trahan , Mrs. Cherfilus-McCormick , Ms. McClellan , Ms. Tokuda , Ms. Norton , Ms. McCollum , Mr. Johnson of Georgia , Mr. Moulton , Mr. Ryan , Ms. DeGette , Mr. Grijalva , Mr. Connolly , Mr. Carson , Ms. Moore of Wisconsin , Ms. Scanlon , Mrs. Dingell , Mr. Panetta , Ms. Brownley , Ms. Elfreth , Mr. McGovern , Mr. Nadler , Ms. Garcia of Texas , Mr. Swalwell , Mr. Horsford , Mr. Norcross , Mr. Garcia of California , Ms. Salinas , Mr. Soto , Mr. Davis of Illinois , Ms. Ansari , Mr. Khanna , Ms. Wilson of Florida , Mr. Tran , Mr. Sorensen , Mrs. Hayes , Ms. Titus , Mr. Gottheimer , Ms. McBride , Mr. Deluzio , Mr. Larson of Connecticut , Mr. Mullin , Mr. Courtney , Ms. Crockett , Ms. Budzinski , Mr. Jackson of Illinois , Ms. Lois Frankel of Florida , Mr. Thompson of Mississippi , Ms. Jacobs , Ms. Strickland , and Mr. Peters ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services A BILL
To establish leave policies of the Armed Forces for a member to seek an abortion.
1.
Short title
This Act may be cited as the Access to Reproductive Care for Servicemembers Act .
2.
Findings
Congress finds the following:
(1)
Following the Supreme Court’s unjust decision to eliminate the right to abortion, States across the country have moved swiftly to ban abortion access, leading to even greater barriers to care for military families.
(2)
Access to the full spectrum of reproductive care, including abortion, is essential to a person’s health and central to their economic and social well-being. Bans and restrictions on abortion delay access to abortion care and therefore increase costs for members of the Armed Forces seeking care. The consequence of these delays and barriers could mean that a person is forced to carry a pregnancy against their will, which can greatly affect their bodily autonomy, financial stability, and overall well-being.
(3)
The Armed Forces have a large presence in many States that ban or restrict access to abortion, many of which also neighbor States that would likely ban abortion.
(4)
Members of the Armed Forces seeking care off-base may be limited in their ability to do so due to restrictions on leave or travel imposed by their unit.
(5)
Restrictions on receiving approval to take leave for abortion or fertility care interfere with a member of the Armed Forces’ health, well-being, and right to access the care they need. The decision to terminate a pregnancy or build a family should not depend on the discretion or judgment of a military commander.
(6)
Abortion and fertility care are time sensitive-procedures and access should not be delayed for members or military families.
(7)
When a member of the Armed Forces decides to obtain abortion or fertility care, it should be available, affordable, private, and free from punishment, reprisal, or judgment by the member’s chain of command.
(8)
Commanders or approval authorities have a duty to display objectivity, compassion, and discretion when addressing all health care matters, including reproductive health care matters, and to enforce existing policies against discrimination and retaliation.
(9)
Members of the Armed Forces and their dependents often face insurmountable barriers to accessing fertility care. These logistical and systemic barriers include discriminatory restrictions on insurance coverage, high out-of-pocket costs, and limited availability of health care facilities. As a result, many members and their dependents are unable to access the fertility care they need to build their families. Ensuring that members and their dependents can access this care is critical to promoting their reproductive and bodily autonomy and their right to decide if, when, and how they have children.
(10)
The harms of abortion-specific restrictions fall most heavily on people who already face barriers to accessing health care including people with low incomes, such as junior enlisted members, and Black, Indigenous, and people of color, immigrants, young people, people with disabilities, the LGBTQI+ community, and those stationed overseas or in rural and other medically underserved areas.
(11)
Equal access to abortion and fertility care, everywhere, is essential to social and economic participation, equality, reproductive autonomy, and the right to determine a person’s own life and future.
(12)
Infertility and access to fertility care implicate core human rights—including rights to health, to sexual and reproductive health, to make decisions about whether and when to have children, and to equality and non-discrimination. Denying members of the Armed Forces benefits to access fertility care violates these rights and undermines their reproductive and bodily autonomy.
(13)
Members of the Armed Forces are exposed to job-related risk factors that increase the likelihood they will experience infertility. Many members are deployed in combat areas where they may experience service-related injuries or exposure to toxic chemicals that harm their fertility. Additionally, the Department of Defense estimates that between 20 and 30 percent of members have experienced sexual assault and post-traumatic stress disorder, both of which have been linked to infertility.
(14)
The denial of leave for an abortion or any other reproductive health service violates the rights of members of the Armed Forces. Access to care for military families should not be determined by the personal beliefs of others.
(15)
In addition to the health and well-being implications for members of the Armed Forces and their families, the failure to address these issues will contribute to the challenges that the Armed Forces faces in attracting and retaining personnel, thereby negatively affecting military strength and readiness.
3.
Leave for a member of the Armed Forces for Non-Covered Reproductive Health Care
(a)
In general
The Secretary concerned (as such term is defined in section 101 of title 10, United States Code) shall, with respect to non-covered reproductive health care (including abortion care) for a member of the Armed Forces or the dependent of such a member—
(1)
consider such care to be time-sensitive and therefore approve leave for such non-covered reproductive health care; and
(2)
not require the member or dependent to disclose to a commanding officer the time-sensitive care or procedure being received during such leave.
(b)
Reimbursement for travel
The Secretary concerned shall reimburse a member or dependent of a member for costs incurred while receiving non-covered reproductive health care services if timely access to such services is not available near the member or dependent’s location. Such costs shall include—
(1)
the cost of meals, including taxes and tips;
(2)
the cost of lodging, including taxes, tips, and services charges;
(3)
the cost of round-trip transportation between the member or dependent’s location and the non-covered reproductive health care service location; and
(4)
if a member of the Armed Forces or a dependent of such a member requests one or more escorts or attendants, the cost of standard travel and transportation allowances for one or more necessary escorts or attendants.
(c)
Privacy
Health care providers of the Defense Health Agency and commanding officers shall, to the greatest extent practicable, protect the privacy of a member who takes leave under this section, including when such member makes a request for such leave and when such member returns to duty.
(d)
Prohibition
No member of the Armed Forces may be subject to any adverse action for requesting, taking, providing, or approving an action authorized by this section.
(e)
Non-Covered reproductive health care defined
In this section, the term non-covered reproductive health care includes—
(1)
abortion care other than abortion care permitted under section 1093 of title 10, United States Code; or
(2)
assisted reproductive technology, including—
(A)
ovarian stimulation and egg retrieval, including any needed medications and procedures required for retrieval, processing, and utilization of an egg for assisted reproductive technology or cryopreservation;
(B)
sperm collection and processing for assisted reproductive technology or cryopreservation;
(C)
intrauterine insemination; and
(D)
in vitro fertilization, including—
(i)
in vitro fertilization with fresh embryo transfer;
(ii)
gamete intrafallopian transfer;
(iii)
zygote intrafollopian transfer;
(iv)
pronuclear stage tubal transfer;
(v)
tubal embryo transfer; and
(vi)
frozen embryo transfer.

Tracker

The tracker indicates the progress of this legislation as it moves through the legislative process.

  1. Introduced2025-02-27
  2. Passed House
  3. Passed Senate
  4. Conference
  5. To President
  6. Became Law

To establish leave policies of the Armed Forces for a member to seek an abortion.

Sponsors

Rep. Rebecca Sherrill (D) sponsors H.R. 1742, and 80 members have co-sponsored it, 56 of them from the day it was introduced.

Committees

H.R. 1742 went before 1 committee: Armed Services.

Armed Services
Armed Services
Referred To · Feb 27, 2025 · 581 Bills

Actions

H.R. 1742 has taken 3 actions since Feb 27, 2025, the latest on Feb 11, 2026.

ChamberAction
Feb 11, 202618:45
House
ASSUMING FIRST SPONSORSHIP - Ms. Houlahan asked unanimous consent that she may hereafter be considered as the first sponsor of H.R. 1742, a bill originally introduced by Representative Sherrill, for the purpose of adding cosponsors and requesting reprintings pursuant to clause 7 of rule XII. Agreed to without objection.
Feb 27, 2025
House
Introduced in House
Feb 27, 2025
House
Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.Armed Services Committee

Votes

H.R. 1742 has not gone to a roll call.

Titles

H.R. 1742 goes by 3 titles, 1 of them short titles.

  • Access to Reproductive Care for Servicemembers Act — Display Title
  • Access to Reproductive Care for Servicemembers Act — Short Title(s) as Introduced
  • To establish leave policies of the Armed Forces for a member to seek an abortion. — Official Title as Introduced

Lobbying

10 clients hired 10 firms and 68 registered lobbyists who named H.R. 1742 in 16 quarterly filings, 2025 to 2026. Reported under the Lobbying Disclosure Act; a filing’s income covers everything its registrant worked that quarter, so the amounts below are the filings’, not this bill’s.

Filed under Budget/Appropriations, Family issues/Abortion/Adoption, Health Issues, Civil Rights/Civil Liberties, Defense, Immigration, Education, Foreign Relations.

Clients

Who paid to be heard, by how many filings named the bill.

ClientBusinessStateFirmsFilingsReported
NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMENDistrict of Columbia16
POWER TO DECIDEDistrict of Columbia12
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNIONDistrict of Columbia11
AMERICAN COLLEGE OF OBSTETRICIANS AND GYNECOLOGISTSDistrict of Columbia11
CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTSNew York11
NATIONAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATIONDistrict of Columbia11
NATIONAL WOMEN'S LAW CENTER ACTION FUNDsocial welfare organization to promote equal rights and opportunities for womenDistrict of Columbia11
PLANNED PARENTHOOD ACTION FUND INCDistrict of Columbia11
PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INCDistrict of Columbia11
REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALLDistrict of Columbia11

Firms

Registrants who filed on the bill, by filings.

Lobbyists

Named on the filings that cite the bill. The 20 named most often, of 68.

Filings

The documents themselves, on the Senate’s Lobbying Disclosure site, largest reported first.

ClientRegistrantPeriodReportedDocument
AMERICAN COLLEGE OF OBSTETRICIANS AND GYNECOLOGISTSAMERICAN COLLEGE OF OBSTETRICIANS AND GYNECOLOGISTS2025 first_quarter$660K1st Quarter - Report
NATIONAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATIONNATIONAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION2025 first_quarter$650K1st Quarter - Report
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNIONAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION2025 second_quarter$640K2nd Quarter - Report
PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INCPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA, INC.2025 first_quarter$109.5K1st Quarter - Report
CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTSCENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS2025 first_quarter$90K1st Quarter - Report
REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALLREPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL2025 first_quarter$50K1st Quarter - Report
NATIONAL WOMEN'S LAW CENTER ACTION FUNDNATIONAL WOMEN'S LAW CENTER ACTION FUND2025 first_quarter$40K1st Quarter - Amendme…
POWER TO DECIDEPOWER TO DECIDE2025 second_quarter$32.6K2nd Quarter - Report
POWER TO DECIDEPOWER TO DECIDE2025 second_quarter$32.6K2nd Quarter - Report
NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMENNATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN2026 second_quarter$10K2nd Quarter - Report
NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMENNATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN2026 first_quarter$10K1st Quarter - Report
NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMENNATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN2025 fourth_quarter$10K4th Quarter - Report
NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMENNATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN2025 third_quarter$10K3rd Quarter - Report
NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMENNATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN2025 second_quarter$10K2nd Quarter - Report
NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMENNATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN2025 first_quarter$10K1st Quarter - Report
PLANNED PARENTHOOD ACTION FUND INCPLANNED PARENTHOOD ACTION FUND, INC.2025 first_quarter$9.7K1st Quarter - Report

Classification

The Congressional Research Service files H.R. 1742 under Armed Forces and National Security, one of its 31 policy areas, and gives it 6 legislative subjects.

CRS Subjects

CRS assigns every bill one policy area from its 31; H.R. 1742’s is Armed Forces and National Security.

hr1742/policy-areas.txt
Armed Forces and National SecurityAgriculture and FoodAnimalsArts, Culture, ReligionCivil Rights and Liberties, Minority IssuesCommerceCongressCrime and Law EnforcementEconomics and Public FinanceEducationEmergency ManagementEnergyEnvironmental ProtectionFamiliesFinance and Financial SectorForeign Trade and International FinanceGovernment Operations and PoliticsHealthHousing and Community DevelopmentImmigrationInternational AffairsLabor and EmploymentLawNative AmericansPublic Lands and Natural ResourcesScience, Technology, CommunicationsSocial WelfareSports and RecreationTaxationTransportation and Public WorksWater Resources Development

Legislative Subjects

H.R. 1742 carries 6 of CRS’s legislative subjects, from Abortion to Transportation costs.

hr1742/subjects.txt
AbortionEmployee leaveMilitary personnel and dependentsRight of privacySex and reproductive healthTransportation costs

Constitutional authority

The clause the sponsor cites as Congress’s power to enact H.R. 1742, as entered in the Congressional Record.

[Congressional Record Volume 171, Number 39 (Thursday, February 27, 2025)][House]From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]By Ms. SHERRILL:H.R. 1742.Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuantto the following:Clause 18 of Section 8 of Article 1 of the Constitution ofthe United States of America.[Page H921]

Source: congress.gov · legiscan.com