Search

Search bills, members, committees and pages...

S. 622

U.S. SenateEngrossed

Summary

S. 622, the Leech Lake Reservation Restoration Amendments Act of 2025, was introduced in the Senate on Feb 18, 2025 by Sen. Tina Smith (D) with 1 co-sponsor. It last saw action on Dec 15, 2025: Held at the desk.


Record

Text

S. 622 has 1 co-sponsor.

sb622/engrossed-in-senate.txt
116 S622 ES: Leech Lake Reservation Restoration Amendments Act of 2025
U.S. Senate
text/xml
EN
Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.
119th CONGRESS 1st Session S. 622 IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES AN ACT
To amend the Leech Lake Band of Ojibwe Reservation Restoration Act to provide for the transfer of additional Federal land to the Leech Lake Band of Ojibwe, and for other purposes.
1.
Short title
This Act may be cited as the Leech Lake Reservation Restoration Amendments Act of 2025 .
2.
Transfer of additional Federal land to the Leech Lake Band of Ojibwe
(a)
Findings
Section 2(a)(5) of the Leech Lake Band of Ojibwe Reservation Restoration Act ( Public Law 116–255 ; 134 Stat. 1140) is amended by striking subparagraph (B) and inserting the following:
(B)
does not intend immediately to modify the use of the Federal land.
.
(b)
Inclusion of additional Federal land
Section 2 of the Leech Lake Band of Ojibwe Reservation Restoration Act ( Public Law 116–255 ; 134 Stat. 1139) is amended—
(1)
in subsection (b)(1)—
(A)
in subparagraph (A)—
(i)
by striking means the approximately and inserting “means—
(i)
the approximately
;
(ii)
in clause (i) (as so designated), by striking the period at the end and inserting ; and ; and
(iii)
by adding at the end the following:
(ii)
any other land managed by the Secretary, through the Chief of the Forest Service, located in the Chippewa National Forest in Cass County, Minnesota, which records maintained by the Bureau of Indian Affairs show was sold without the unanimous consent of the rightful landowners.
; and
(B)
in subparagraph (B)—
(i)
by redesignating clauses (i) and (ii) as clauses (ii) and (iii), respectively; and
(ii)
by inserting before clause (ii) (as so redesignated) the following:
(i)
any land transferred pursuant to an agreement entered into between the Secretary and the Tribe under subsection (c)(2);
;
(2)
in subsection (c)—
(A)
in paragraph (1), by striking paragraph (2) and inserting paragraphs (2) and (3) ;
(B)
by redesignating paragraph (2) as paragraph (3); and
(C)
by inserting after paragraph (1) the following:
(2)
Agreement
(A)
In general
On agreement between the Secretary and the Tribe, the Secretary shall substitute, for purposes of the transfer under paragraph (1), alternative National Forest System land located in Cass County, Minnesota, on an acre-for-acre basis, for those parcels of Federal land to be transferred under that paragraph in a manner that avoids in-holdings and provides a preference for land adjacent to or near existing Leech Lake trust lands and lands of cultural importance to the Tribe, to the maximum extent practicable.
(B)
Frequency of transfers
Pursuant to an agreement entered into under subparagraph (A), the Secretary may transfer land to the Secretary of the Interior on a rolling basis as that land is identified and surveys are completed.
; and
(3)
in subsection (d)—
(A)
in paragraph (1)—
(i)
in subparagraph (A), by inserting described in subsection (b)(1)(A)(i) after Federal land ; and
(ii)
in subparagraph (B), in the matter preceding clause (i), by striking submit a map and legal description of the Federal land and inserting submit maps and legal descriptions of the Federal land transferred pursuant to paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsection (c), as applicable, ;
(B)
in paragraph (2)—
(i)
by striking map and legal description and inserting maps and legal descriptions ; and
(ii)
by striking map or legal description and inserting maps or legal descriptions ; and
(C)
in paragraph (3), by striking map and legal description and inserting maps and legal descriptions .
(c)
Reaffirmation
Congress reaffirms the applicability of section 97A.151 of the Minnesota Statutes, including the settlement agreement ratified by that section, for purposes of ensuring that the hunting, fishing, and recreation rights of non-Tribal members remain unchanged by the Leech Lake Band of Ojibwe Reservation Restoration Act ( Public Law 116–255 ; 134 Stat. 1139) and the amendments made to that Act by this section.
(d)
Implementation
In implementing the amendments made by this section, the Secretary of Agriculture, acting through the Chief of the Forest Service, shall provide for public engagement and comment in accordance with applicable laws (including regulations).
Passed the Senate December 11, 2025. Secretary

Tracker

The tracker indicates the progress of this legislation as it moves through the legislative process.

  1. Introduced2025-02-18
  2. Passed Senate2025-12-11
  3. Passed House
  4. Conference
  5. To President
  6. Became Law

CRS Summary

The summaries are the Congressional Research Service’s, one per stage. Read them in full.

Introduced in Senate Feb 18, 2025

sb622/introduced-in-senate.md

Shown Here:
Introduced in Senate (02/18/2025)

Leech Lake Reservation Restoration Amendments Act of 2025

This bill transfers certain federal land located in the Chippewa National Forest in Cass County, Minnesota, to the Department of the Interior for the benefit of the Leech Lake Band of Ojibwe.

Specifically, the bill requires the Department of Agriculture (USDA) to transfer for the benefit of the tribe land in the Chippewa National Forest that records maintained by the Bureau of Indian Affairs show was sold without the unanimous consent of the rightful landowners.

Upon agreement between USDA and the tribe, USDA shall substitute alternative National Forest System land located in Cass County, Minnesota, on an acre-for-acre basis for those parcels of federal land to be transferred in a manner that avoids inholdings and provides a preference for land adjacent to or near existing Leech Lake trust lands and lands of cultural importance to the tribe, to the maximum extent practicable.

USDA may transfer land to Interior on a rolling basis as that land is identified and surveys are completed.

USDA, acting through the U.S. Forest Service, must provide for public engagement and comment to implement this bill.

Sponsors

Sen. Tina Smith (D) sponsors S. 622, and 1 member has co-sponsored it from the day it was introduced.

Committees

S. 622 went before 1 committee: Indian Affairs.

Indian Affairs
Indian Affairs
Reported By · Oct 14, 2025 · 49 Bills

Reports

1 committee report has been filed on S. 622, the latest S. Rept. 119-78.

  • S. Rept. 119-78 — LEECH LAKE RESERVATION RESTORATION AMENDMENTS ACT OF 2025

Actions

S. 622 has taken 10 actions since Feb 18, 2025, the latest on Dec 15, 2025.

ChamberAction
Dec 15, 2025
Senate
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Dec 15, 202516:06
House
Received in the House.
Dec 15, 202516:18
House
Held at the desk.
Dec 11, 2025
Senate
Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S8687-8688; text: CR S8688)
Dec 11, 2025
Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent.

Votes

S. 622 has not gone to a roll call.

Titles

S. 622 goes by 5 titles, 3 of them short titles.

  • Leech Lake Reservation Restoration Amendments Act of 2025 — Display Title
  • Leech Lake Reservation Restoration Amendments Act of 2025 — Short Title(s) as Passed Senate
  • Leech Lake Reservation Restoration Amendments Act of 2025 — Short Title(s) as Reported to Senate
  • Leech Lake Reservation Restoration Amendments Act of 2025 — Short Title(s) as Introduced
  • A bill to amend the Leech Lake Band of Ojibwe Reservation Restoration Act to provide for the transfer of additional Federal land to the Leech Lake Band of Ojibwe, and for other purposes. — Official Title as Introduced

Cost estimate

The Congressional Budget Office has filed 1 estimate for S. 622, the latest on May 28, 2025.


Lobbying

1 client hired 1 firm and 2 registered lobbyists who named S. 622 in 1 quarterly filing, 2025. Reported under the Lobbying Disclosure Act; a filing’s income covers everything its registrant worked that quarter, so the amounts below are the filings’, not this bill’s.

Filed under Budget/Appropriations, Energy/Nuclear, Taxation/Internal Revenue Code.

Clients

Who paid to be heard, by how many filings named the bill.

ClientBusinessStateFirmsFilingsReported
ALTERNATIVE FUELS & CHEMICALS COALITIONDistrict of Columbia11

Firms

Registrants who filed on the bill, by filings.

RegistrantClientsFilingsReported
ALTERNATIVE FUELS & CHEMICALS COALITION11

Lobbyists

Named on the filings that cite the bill.

LobbyistFirmsClientsFilings
CJ EVANS111
DR RINA SINGH111

Filings

The documents themselves, on the Senate’s Lobbying Disclosure site, largest reported first.

ClientRegistrantPeriodReportedDocument
ALTERNATIVE FUELS & CHEMICALS COALITIONALTERNATIVE FUELS & CHEMICALS COALITION2025 first_quarter1st Quarter - Report

Classification

The Congressional Research Service files S. 622 under Native Americans, one of its 31 policy areas, and gives it 7 legislative subjects.

CRS Subjects

CRS assigns every bill one policy area from its 31; S. 622’s is Native Americans.

s622/policy-areas.txt
Native AmericansAgriculture and FoodAnimalsArmed Forces and National SecurityArts, Culture, ReligionCivil Rights and Liberties, Minority IssuesCommerceCongressCrime and Law EnforcementEconomics and Public FinanceEducationEmergency ManagementEnergyEnvironmental ProtectionFamiliesFinance and Financial SectorForeign Trade and International FinanceGovernment Operations and PoliticsHealthHousing and Community DevelopmentImmigrationInternational AffairsLabor and EmploymentLawPublic Lands and Natural ResourcesScience, Technology, CommunicationsSocial WelfareSports and RecreationTaxationTransportation and Public WorksWater Resources Development

Legislative Subjects

S. 622 carries 7 of CRS’s legislative subjects, from Congressional oversight to Minnesota.

s622/subjects.txt
Congressional oversightFederal-Indian relationsForests, forestry, treesIndian claimsIndian lands and resources rightsLand transfersMinnesota

Source: congress.gov · legiscan.com