Search

Search bills, members, committees and pages...

S. 569

U.S. SenateIn Senate Committee

Summary

S. 569, the POSTAL Act, was introduced in the Senate on Feb 13, 2025 by Sen. Cynthia Lummis (R) with 3 co-sponsors. It was referred to Homeland Security And Governmental Affairs, and last saw action on Feb 13, 2025: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.


Record

Text

S. 569 has 3 co-sponsors.

sb569/introduced-in-senate.txt
119 S569 IS: Postal Operations Stay Timely and Local Act
U.S. Senate
2025-02-13
text/xml
EN
Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.
II 119th CONGRESS 1st Session S. 569 IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES February 13, 2025 Ms. Lummis (for herself, Ms. Hassan , Mr. Barrasso , and Mrs. Shaheen ) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs A BILL
To limit the closure or consolidation of any United States Postal Service processing and distribution center in States, and for other purposes.
1.
Short title
This Act may be cited as the Postal Operations Stay Timely and Local Act or the POSTAL Act .
2.
Limitation on closing or consolidating Postal Service processing and distribution centers in States
(a)
Definitions
In this section:
(1)
Processing and distribution center
The term processing and distribution center means a central mail facility that—
(A)
distributes and dispatches part or all of both incoming mail and outgoing mail for a designated service area;
(B)
provides instructions on the preparation of collection mail, dispatch schedules, and sorting plan requirements to mailers; and
(C)
is a sectional center facility, a general mail facility, or a dedicated mail processing facility without a station or branch.
(2)
State
The term State means a State or the District of Columbia.
(b)
Limitation
The United States Postal Service may not close, consolidate, downgrade, or take any other similar action with respect to a processing and distribution center in a State if such action would result in there being no processing and distribution center located in that State.

Tracker

The tracker indicates the progress of this legislation as it moves through the legislative process.

  1. Introduced2025-02-13
  2. Passed Senate
  3. Passed House
  4. Conference
  5. To President
  6. Became Law

A bill to limit the closure or consolidation of any United States Postal Service processing and distribution center in States, and for other purposes.

Sponsors

Sen. Cynthia Lummis (R) sponsors S. 569, and 3 members have co-sponsored it, all of them from the day it was introduced.

Committees

S. 569 went before 1 committee: Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.

Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs
Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs
Referred To · Feb 13, 2025 · 444 Bills

Actions

S. 569 has taken 2 actions since Feb 13, 2025.

ChamberAction
Feb 13, 2025
Senate
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee
Feb 13, 2025
Introduced in Senate

Votes

S. 569 has not gone to a roll call.

Titles

S. 569 goes by 4 titles, 2 of them short titles.

  • POSTAL Act — Display Title
  • POSTAL Act — Short Title(s) as Introduced
  • Postal Operations Stay Timely and Local Act — Short Title(s) as Introduced
  • A bill to limit the closure or consolidation of any United States Postal Service processing and distribution center in States, and for other purposes. — Official Title as Introduced

Lobbying

1 client hired 2 firms and 3 registered lobbyists who named S. 569 in 8 quarterly filings, 2025 to 2026. Reported under the Lobbying Disclosure Act; a filing’s income covers everything its registrant worked that quarter, so the amounts below are the filings’, not this bill’s.

Filed under Budget/Appropriations, Manufacturing, Postal, Tariff (miscellaneous tariff bills), Financial Institutions/Investments/Securities.

Clients

Who paid to be heard, by how many filings named the bill.

ClientBusinessStateFirmsFilingsReported
ENVELOPE MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATIONAssociation of envelope manufacturing companiesVirginia28$100K

Firms

Registrants who filed on the bill, by filings.

RegistrantClientsFilingsReported
CAPITOLINE CONSULTING, LLC15$100K
ENVELOPE MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION13

Lobbyists

Named on the filings that cite the bill.

LobbyistFirmsClientsFilings
ELIZABETH ROBERTS115
JUDITH ZINK115
MARIE CLARKE113

Filings

The documents themselves, on the Senate’s Lobbying Disclosure site, largest reported first.

ClientRegistrantPeriodReportedDocument
ENVELOPE MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATIONENVELOPE MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION2026 first_quarter$20K1st Quarter - Report
ENVELOPE MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATIONCAPITOLINE CONSULTING, LLC2026 first_quarter$20K1st Quarter - Report
ENVELOPE MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATIONENVELOPE MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION2025 fourth_quarter$20K4th Quarter - Report
ENVELOPE MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATIONCAPITOLINE CONSULTING, LLC2025 fourth_quarter$20K4th Quarter - Report
ENVELOPE MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATIONENVELOPE MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION2025 third_quarter$20K3rd Quarter - Report
ENVELOPE MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATIONCAPITOLINE CONSULTING, LLC2025 third_quarter$20K3rd Quarter - Report
ENVELOPE MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATIONCAPITOLINE CONSULTING, LLC2025 second_quarter$20K2nd Quarter - Report
ENVELOPE MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATIONCAPITOLINE CONSULTING, LLC2025 first_quarter$20K1st Quarter - Report

Classification

The Congressional Research Service files S. 569 under Government Operations and Politics, one of its 31 policy areas.

CRS Subjects

CRS assigns every bill one policy area from its 31; S. 569’s is Government Operations and Politics.

s569/policy-areas.txt
Government Operations and PoliticsAgriculture and FoodAnimalsArmed Forces and National SecurityArts, Culture, ReligionCivil Rights and Liberties, Minority IssuesCommerceCongressCrime and Law EnforcementEconomics and Public FinanceEducationEmergency ManagementEnergyEnvironmental ProtectionFamiliesFinance and Financial SectorForeign Trade and International FinanceHealthHousing and Community DevelopmentImmigrationInternational AffairsLabor and EmploymentLawNative AmericansPublic Lands and Natural ResourcesScience, Technology, CommunicationsSocial WelfareSports and RecreationTaxationTransportation and Public WorksWater Resources Development

Source: congress.gov · legiscan.com