Search

Search bills, members, committees and pages...

S. 539

U.S. SenateSenate Floor Calendar

Summary

S. 539, the PROTECT Our Children Reauthorization Act of 2025, was introduced in the Senate on Feb 12, 2025 by Sen. John Cornyn (R) with 12 co-sponsors. It last saw action on May 20, 2025: Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 80.


Record

Text

S. 539 has 12 co-sponsors.

sb539/introduced-in-senate.txt
119 S539 IS: PROTECT Our Children Reauthorization Act of 2025
U.S. Senate
2025-02-12
text/xml
EN
Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.
II 119th CONGRESS 1st Session S. 539 IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES February 12, 2025 Mr. Cornyn (for himself, Mr. Blumenthal , Mrs. Blackburn , Ms. Klobuchar , Mr. Hawley , and Mr. Durbin ) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary A BILL
To reauthorize the PROTECT Our Children Act of 2008, and for other purposes.
1.
Short title
This Act may be cited as the PROTECT Our Children Reauthorization Act of 2025 .
2.
Reauthorization
(a)
Establishment of National Strategy for Child Exploitation Prevention and Interdiction
Section 101 of the PROTECT Our Children Act of 2008 ( 34 U.S.C. 21111 ) is amended—
(1)
in subsection (b), by striking every second year and inserting every fourth year ; and
(2)
by striking subsection (c) and inserting the following:
(c)
Required contents of National Strategy
The National Strategy established under subsection (a) shall include the following:
(1)
An analysis of current trends, challenges, and the overall magnitude of the threat of child exploitation.
(2)
An analysis of future trends and challenges, including new technologies, that will impact the efforts to combat child exploitation.
(3)
Goals and strategic solutions to prevent and interdict child exploitation, including—
(A)
plans for interagency coordination;
(B)
engagement with the judicial branches of the Federal Government and State governments;
(C)
legislative recommendations for combating child exploitation;
(D)
cooperation with international, State, local, and Tribal law enforcement agencies; and
(E)
engagement with the private sector and other entities involved in efforts to combat child exploitation.
(4)
An analysis of Federal efforts dedicated to combating child exploitation, including—
(A)
a review of the policies and work of the Department of Justice and other Federal programs relating to the prevention and interdiction of child exploitation crimes, including training programs, and investigative and prosecution activity; and
(B)
a description of the efforts of the Department of Justice to cooperate and coordinate with, and provide technical assistance and support to, international, State, local, and Tribal law enforcement agencies and private sector and nonprofit entities with respect to child exploitation prevention and interdiction efforts.
(5)
An estimate of the resources required to effectively respond to child exploitation crimes at scale by—
(A)
each ICAC task force;
(B)
the Federal Bureau of Investigation, including investigators, forensic interviewers, and analysts of victims, witnesses, and forensics;
(C)
Homeland Security Investigations, including forensic interviewers and analysts of victims, witnesses, and forensics;
(D)
the United States Marshals Service;
(E)
the United States Secret Service;
(F)
the United States Postal Service;
(G)
the criminal investigative offices of the Department of Defense; and
(H)
any component of an agency described in this paragraph.
(6)
A review of the Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force Program, including—
(A)
the number of ICAC task forces and the location of each ICAC task force;
(B)
the number of trained personnel at each ICAC task force;
(C)
the amount of Federal grants awarded to each ICAC task force; and
(D)
an assessment of the Federal, State, and local cooperation with respect to each ICAC task force, including—
(i)
the number of arrests made by each ICAC task force;
(ii)
the number of criminal referrals to United States attorneys for prosecution;
(iii)
the number of prosecutions and convictions from the referrals described in clause (ii);
(iv)
the number, if available, of local prosecutions and convictions based on ICAC task force investigations; and
(v)
any other information determined by the Attorney General demonstrating the level of Federal, State, Tribal, and local coordination and cooperation.
(7)
An assessment of training needs for each ICAC task force and affiliated agencies.
(8)
An assessment of Federal investigative and prosecution activity relating to reported incidents of child exploitation crimes that include a number of factors, including—
(A)
the number of investigations, arrests, prosecutions and convictions for a crime of child exploitation; and
(B)
the average sentence imposed and the statutory maximum sentence that could be imposed for each crime of child exploitation.
(9)
A review of all available statistical data indicating the overall magnitude of child pornography trafficking in the United States and internationally, including—
(A)
the number of foreign and domestic suspects observed engaging in accessing and sharing child pornography;
(B)
the number of tips or other statistical data from the CyberTipline of the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children and other data indicating the magnitude of child pornography trafficking; and
(C)
any other statistical data indicating the type, nature, and extent of child exploitation crime in the United States and abroad.
.
(b)
Establishment of National ICAC Task Force Program
Section 102 of the PROTECT Our Children Act of 2008 ( 34 U.S.C. 21112 ) is amended—
(1)
in subsection (a)(1)—
(A)
by inserting , Tribal, military, after State ; and
(B)
by striking and child obscenity and pornography cases and inserting child obscenity and pornography cases, and the identification of child victims ;
(2)
in subsection (b)—
(A)
in paragraph (2), by striking consult with and consider and all that follows through track record of success. and inserting , evaluate the task forces funded under the ICAC Task Force Program to determine if those task forces are operating in an effective manner. ;
(B)
in paragraph (3)(B)—
(i)
by striking establish a new task force and inserting establish a new or continue an existing task force ; and
(ii)
by striking state and inserting State ; and
(C)
in paragraph (4)—
(i)
in subparagraph (A), by striking may and inserting shall ;
(ii)
by striking subparagraph (B); and
(iii)
by redesignating subparagraph (C) as subparagraph (B); and
(3)
by adding at the end the following:
(c)
Limited liability for ICAC task forces
(1)
In general
Except as provided in paragraph (2), a civil claim or criminal charge against an ICAC task force established pursuant to this section and sections 103 and 104, including any law enforcement agency that participates on such a task force or a director, officer, employee, or agent of such a law enforcement agency, arising from the prioritization decisions with respect to leads related to Internet crimes against children described in section 104(8), may not be brought in any Federal or State court.
(2)
Intentional, reckless, or other misconduct
Paragraph (1) shall not apply to a claim if the ICAC task force or law enforcement agency, or a director, officer, employee, or agent of that law enforcement agency—
(A)
engaged in intentional misconduct; or
(B)
acted, or failed to act—
(i)
with actual malice;
(ii)
with reckless disregard to a substantial risk of causing physical injury without legal justification; or
(iii)
for a purpose unrelated to the performance of any responsibility or function under section 104(8).
.
(c)
Purpose of ICAC task forces
Section 103 of the PROTECT Our Children Act of 2008 ( 34 U.S.C. 21113 ) is amended—
(1)
in paragraph (1), by inserting , and the identification of child victims of those crimes before the semicolon at the end;
(2)
in paragraph (2), by inserting and prioritizing investigations that task force personnel, through the background, training and experience of those personnel and the consideration of all relevant circumstances, determine to be most likely to result in positive case outcomes and in the rescue of children before the semicolon at the end;
(3)
in paragraph (3)—
(A)
by striking and local law enforcement and inserting Tribal, military, and local law enforcement ; and
(B)
by inserting , including probation and parole agencies, child advocacy centers, and child protective services, after enforcement agencies ;
(4)
in paragraph (8), by striking and at the end;
(5)
in paragraph (9), by striking the period at the end and inserting ; and ; and
(6)
by adding at the end the following:
(10)
educating the judiciary on—
(A)
the link between intrafamilial contact offenses and technology-facilitated crimes; and
(B)
characteristics of internet offenders, including the interest of online offenders in incest-themed material, sadism, and other related paraphilias or illegal activity.
.
(d)
Duties and functions of task forces
Section 104 of the PROTECT Our Children Act of 2008 ( 34 U.S.C. 21114 ) is amended—
(1)
in paragraph (3)—
(A)
by inserting reactive and before proactive ;
(B)
by inserting conduct digital before forensic examinations ; and
(C)
by inserting engage in before effective prosecutions ;
(2)
by striking paragraph (8) and inserting the following:
(8)
investigate, seek prosecution with respect to, and identify child victims from leads relating to Internet crimes against children, including CyberTipline reports, with prioritization determined according to circumstances and by each task force, as described in section 102;
;
(3)
by striking paragraph (9); and
(4)
by redesignating paragraphs (10) and (11) as paragraphs (9) and (10), respectively.
(e)
National Internet Crimes Against Children Data System
Section 105 of the PROTECT Our Children Act of 2008 ( 34 U.S.C. 21115 ) is amended—
(1)
in subsection (a), by striking shall establish and inserting may establish ;
(2)
in subsection (b) by striking continue and build upon Operation Fairplay developed by the Wyoming Attorney General's office, which has established a secure, dynamic undercover infrastructure that has facilitated and inserting facilitate ; and
(3)
in subsection (g)—
(A)
by striking paragraph (3);
(B)
by redesignating paragraphs (4) through (8) as paragraphs (3) through (7), respectively; and
(C)
in paragraph (7), as so redesignated, by striking 1 representative and inserting 2 representatives .
(f)
ICAC grant program
Section 106 of the PROTECT Our Children Act of 2008 ( 34 U.S.C. 21116 ) is amended—
(1)
in subsection (a)—
(A)
in paragraph (2)(B)(ii)(II), by striking Operation Fairplay, ; and
(B)
in paragraph (3)—
(i)
by striking subparagraph (A) and inserting the following:
(A)
Not less than 20 percent of the total funds appropriated to carry out this section shall be distributed to support the ICAC Task Force Program through grants to—
(i)
provide training and technical assistance to members of the ICAC Task Force Program;
(ii)
maintain, enhance, research, and develop tools and technology to assist members of the ICAC Task Force Program;
(iii)
provide other support to the ICAC Task Force Program determined by the Attorney General;
(iv)
conduct research;
(v)
support the annual National Law Enforcement Training on Child Exploitation of the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention; and
(vi)
provide wellness training.
; and
(2)
in subsection (d)(1)—
(A)
in subparagraph (B)—
(i)
in clause (ii), by striking and at the end;
(ii)
in clause (iii), by striking , including and all that follows through such crime under State law. and inserting ; and ; and
(iii)
by adding at the end the following:
(iv)
the number of child victims identified.
;
(B)
by striking subparagraph (D); and
(C)
by redesignating subparagraphs (E) through (G) as subparagraphs (D) through (F), respectively.
(g)
Authorization of appropriations
Section 107(a) of the PROTECT Our Children Act of 2008 ( 34 U.S.C. 21117(a) ) is amended—
(1)
in paragraph (9), by striking and at the end;
(2)
in paragraph (10), by striking the period at the end and inserting a semicolon; and
(3)
by adding at the end the following:
(11)
$70,000,000 for fiscal year 2026;
(12)
$80,000,000 for fiscal year 2027; and
(13)
$90,000,000 for fiscal year 2028.
.
(h)
Additional regional computer forensic labs
The PROTECT Our Children Act of 2008 ( 34 U.S.C. 21101 et seq. ) is amended by striking title II.
(i)
Reporting requirements of providers
Section 2258A(c) of title 18, United States Code, is amended, in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by inserting and all supplemental data included in the report after each report made under subsection (a)(1) .

Tracker

The tracker indicates the progress of this legislation as it moves through the legislative process.

  1. Introduced2025-02-12
  2. Passed Senate
  3. Passed House
  4. Conference
  5. To President
  6. Became Law

CRS Summary

The summaries are the Congressional Research Service’s, one per stage. Read them in full.

Introduced in Senate Feb 12, 2025

sb539/introduced-in-senate.md

Shown Here:
Introduced in Senate (02/12/2025)

PROTECT Our Children Reauthorization Act of 2025

This bill reauthorizes through FY2028 and updates (1) the National Strategy for Child Exploitation Prevention and Interdiction (National Strategy), and (2) the National Internet Crimes Against Children (ICAC) Task Force Program.

With respect to the National Strategy, current law requires the Department of Justice (DOJ) to update the strategy every two years and include 19 specific elements in the strategy (e.g., long-range goals, annual measurable objectives, and future trends). This bill requires DOJ to update the National Strategy every four years. The bill also revises and consolidates the 19 required elements into 9 required elements, including an analysis of current trends and challenges as well as the overall magnitude of the threat of child exploitation.

The ICAC Task Force Program is a national network of task forces that support state and local efforts to investigate and prosecute the online sexual exploitation of children. This bill requires ICAC task forces to increase the investigative capacity of law enforcement to identify child victims and report the number of child victims identified in their annual reports. The bill also limits the liability of ICAC task forces for civil claims or criminal charges in federal or state court arising from decisions with respect to leads related to internet crimes against children.

Finally, the bill requires the National Center for Missing & Exploited Children to provide additional information to law enforcement agencies when it refers a report of online sexual exploitation of children for investigation.

Sponsors

Sen. John Cornyn (R) sponsors S. 539, and 12 members have co-sponsored it, 5 of them from the day it was introduced.

Committees

S. 539 went before 1 committee: Judiciary.

Judiciary
Judiciary
Reported By · May 20, 2025

Actions

S. 539 has taken 5 actions since Feb 12, 2025, the latest on May 20, 2025.

ChamberAction
May 20, 2025
Senate
Committee on the Judiciary. Reported by Senator Grassley with an amendment in the nature of a substitute. Without written report.Judiciary Committee
May 20, 2025
Senate
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 80.
May 15, 2025
Senate
Committee on the Judiciary. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.Judiciary Committee
Feb 12, 2025
Senate
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.Judiciary Committee
Feb 12, 2025
Introduced in Senate

Votes

S. 539 has not gone to a roll call.

2 bills are related to S. 539.

Titles

S. 539 goes by 4 titles, 2 of them short titles.

  • PROTECT Our Children Reauthorization Act of 2025 — Display Title
  • PROTECT Our Children Reauthorization Act of 2025 — Short Title(s) as Reported to Senate
  • PROTECT Our Children Reauthorization Act of 2025 — Short Title(s) as Introduced
  • A bill to reauthorize the PROTECT Our Children Act of 2008, and for other purposes. — Official Title as Introduced

Cost estimate

The Congressional Budget Office has filed 1 estimate for S. 539, the latest on Jul 17, 2025.


Lobbying

3 clients hired 3 firms and 13 registered lobbyists who named S. 539 in 11 quarterly filings, 2025 to 2026. Reported under the Lobbying Disclosure Act; a filing’s income covers everything its registrant worked that quarter, so the amounts below are the filings’, not this bill’s.

Filed under Law Enforcement/Crime/Criminal Justice, Budget/Appropriations, Computer Industry, Consumer Issues/Safety/Products, Science/Technology, Government Issues, Health Issues, Labor Issues/Antitrust/Workplace.

Clients

Who paid to be heard, by how many filings named the bill.

ClientBusinessStateFirmsFilingsReported
RAVENNon-profit focused on child exploitation.Colorado16$120K
SERGEANTS BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION OF NEW YORK CITYLabor organizationNew York13$110K
PEACE OFFICERS RESEARCH ASSOCIATION OF CALIFORNIALaw enforcementCalifornia12$100K

Firms

Registrants who filed on the bill, by filings.

RegistrantClientsFilingsReported
KLEIN/JOHNSON GROUP16$120K
LONGBOW PUBLIC POLICY GROUP, LLC13$110K
STEPTOE LLP12$100K

Lobbyists

Named on the filings that cite the bill.

Filings

The documents themselves, on the Senate’s Lobbying Disclosure site, largest reported first.

ClientRegistrantPeriodReportedDocument
PEACE OFFICERS RESEARCH ASSOCIATION OF CALIFORNIASTEPTOE LLP2025 fourth_quarter$50K4th Quarter - Report
PEACE OFFICERS RESEARCH ASSOCIATION OF CALIFORNIASTEPTOE LLP2025 third_quarter$50K3rd Quarter - Report
SERGEANTS BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION OF NEW YORK CITYLONGBOW PUBLIC POLICY GROUP, LLC2025 fourth_quarter$40K4th Quarter - Report
SERGEANTS BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION OF NEW YORK CITYLONGBOW PUBLIC POLICY GROUP, LLC2025 third_quarter$40K3rd Quarter - Report
SERGEANTS BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION OF NEW YORK CITYLONGBOW PUBLIC POLICY GROUP, LLC2025 second_quarter$30K2nd Quarter - Report
RAVENKLEIN/JOHNSON GROUP2026 second_quarter$20K2nd Quarter - Report
RAVENKLEIN/JOHNSON GROUP2026 first_quarter$20K1st Quarter - Report
RAVENKLEIN/JOHNSON GROUP2025 fourth_quarter$20K4th Quarter - Report
RAVENKLEIN/JOHNSON GROUP2025 third_quarter$20K3rd Quarter - Report
RAVENKLEIN/JOHNSON GROUP2025 second_quarter$20K2nd Quarter - Report
RAVENKLEIN/JOHNSON GROUP2025 first_quarter$20K1st Quarter - Report

Classification

The Congressional Research Service files S. 539 under Crime and Law Enforcement, one of its 31 policy areas, and gives it 16 legislative subjects.

CRS Subjects

CRS assigns every bill one policy area from its 31; S. 539’s is Crime and Law Enforcement.

s539/policy-areas.txt
Crime and Law EnforcementAgriculture and FoodAnimalsArmed Forces and National SecurityArts, Culture, ReligionCivil Rights and Liberties, Minority IssuesCommerceCongressEconomics and Public FinanceEducationEmergency ManagementEnergyEnvironmental ProtectionFamiliesFinance and Financial SectorForeign Trade and International FinanceGovernment Operations and PoliticsHealthHousing and Community DevelopmentImmigrationInternational AffairsLabor and EmploymentLawNative AmericansPublic Lands and Natural ResourcesScience, Technology, CommunicationsSocial WelfareSports and RecreationTaxationTransportation and Public WorksWater Resources Development

Legislative Subjects

S. 539 carries 16 of CRS’s legislative subjects, from Child safety and welfare to Smuggling and trafficking.

s539/subjects.txt
Child safety and welfareCivil actions and liabilityComputers and information technologyCrime preventionCrimes against childrenCriminal investigation, prosecution, interrogationCriminal justice information and recordsDomestic violence and child abuseHuman traffickingIntergovernmental relationsInternet, web applications, social mediaLaw enforcement administration and fundingMissing personsPornographySex offensesSmuggling and trafficking

Source: congress.gov · legiscan.com