- H.R. 10171August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10156August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10172August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10160August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10181August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10176August 27, 2026
- H.Res. 1496August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10164August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10170August 27, 2026
- H.Res. 1494August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10163August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10157August 27, 2026
- Administration
- Agriculture
- Agriculture, Nutrition, And Forestry
- Appropriations
- Armed Services
- Banking, Housing, And Urban Affairs
- Budget
- Commerce, Science, And Transportation
- Education and Workforce
- Energy And Commerce
- Energy And Natural Resources
- Environment And Public Works
- Ethics
- Finance
- Financial Services
- Foreign Affairs
- Foreign Relations
- Health, Education, Labor, And Pensions
- Homeland Security
- Homeland Security And Governmental Affa…
- Indian Affairs
- Indian and Insular Affairs
- Intelligence
- Judiciary
- Natural Resources
- Oversight And Government Reform
- Permanent Select Intelligence
- Rules
- Rules And Administration
- Science, Space, And Technology
- Select Intelligence
- Small Business
- Small Business And Entrepreneurship
- Subcommittee on Aviation
- Subcommittee on Border Security and Enf…
- Subcommittee on Coast Guard and Maritim…
- Subcommittee on Commodity Markets, Digi…
- Subcommittee on Conservation, Research,…
- Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and In…
- Subcommittee on Cybersecurity and Infra…
- Subcommittee on Disability Assistance a…
- Subcommittee on Economic Development, P…
- Subcommittee on Economic Opportunity
- Subcommittee on Emergency Management an…
- Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Reso…
- Subcommittee on Federal Lands
- Subcommittee on Forestry and Horticultu…
- Subcommittee on General Farm Commoditie…
- Subcommittee on Health
- Subcommittee on Highways and Transit
- Subcommittee on Livestock, Dairy, and P…
- Subcommittee on Nutrition and Foreign A…
- Subcommittee on Oversight and Investiga…
- Subcommittee on Oversight, Investigatio…
- Subcommittee on Railroads, Pipelines, a…
- Subcommittee on Transportation and Mari…
- Subcommittee on Water Resources and Env…
- Subcommittee on Water, Wildlife and Fis…
- Transportation And Infrastructure
- Veterans' Affairs
- Ways And Means

H.R. 987
U.S. House•In House Committee
Summary
H.R. 987, the Fair Access to Banking Act, was introduced in the House on Feb 5, 2025 by Rep. Garland Barr (R) with 113 co-sponsors. It was referred to Financial Services, and last saw action on Feb 5, 2025: Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Record
Text
H.R. 987 has 113 co-sponsors.
hb987/introduced-in-house.txt119 HR 987 IH: Fair Access to Banking ActU.S. House of Representatives2025-02-05text/xmlENPursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.I 119th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 987 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES February 5, 2025 Mr. Barr (for himself, Mr. Meuser , Mr. Scott Franklin of Florida , Mr. Clyde , and Mr. Harrigan ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services A BILLTo amend certain banking laws to prohibit certain financial service providers who deny fair access to financial services from using taxpayer funded discount window lending programs, and for other purposes.1.Short titleThis Act may be cited as the Fair Access to Banking Act .2.FindingsCongress finds that—(1)article I of the Constitution of the United States guarantees the people of the United States the right to enact public policy through the free and fair election of representatives and through the actions of State legislatures and Congress;(2)financial institutions rightly objected to the Operation Choke Point initiative through which certain government agencies pressured financial institutions to cut off access to financial services to lawful sectors of the economy;(3)in response to pressure from advocates whose policy objectives are served when financial institutions deny certain customers access to financial services, financial institutions are now, however, increasingly employing subjective, category-based evaluations to deny certain persons access to financial services;(4)this privatization of the discriminatory practices underlying Operation Choke Point by financial institutions represents as great a threat to the national economy, national security, and the soundness of banking and financial markets in the United States as Operation Choke Point itself;(5)financial institutions are supported by the United States taxpayers and enjoy significant privileges in the financial system of the United States and should not be permitted to act as de facto regulators or unelected legislators by withholding financial services to otherwise credit worthy businesses based on subjective political reasons, bias or prejudices;(6)financial institutions are not well-equipped to balance risks unrelated to financial exposures and the operations required to deliver financial services;(7)the United States taxpayers came to the aid for large financial institutions during the great recession of 2008 because they were deemed too important to the national economy to be permitted to fail;(8)when a financial institution predicates the access to financial services of a person on factors or information (such as the lawful products a customer manufactures or sells or the services the customer provides) other than quantitative, impartial risk-based standards, the financial institution has failed to act consistent with basic principles of sound risk management and failed to provide fair access to financial services;(9)financial institutions have a responsibility to make decisions about whether to provide a person with financial services on the basis of impartial criteria free from prejudice or favoritism;(10)while fair access to financial services does not obligate a financial institution to offer any particular financial service to the public, or to operate in any particular geographic area, or to provide a service the financial institution offers to any particular person, it is necessary that—(A)the financial services a financial institution chooses to offer in the geographic areas in which the financial institution operates be made available to all customers based on the quantitative, impartial risk-based standards of the financial institution, and not based on whether the customer is in a particular category of customers;(B)financial institutions assess the risks posed by individual customers on a case-by-case basis, rather than category-based assessment; and(C)financial institutions implement controls to manage relationships commensurate with these risks associated with each customer, not a strategy of total avoidance of particular industries or categories of customers;(11)financial institutions are free to provide or deny financial services to any individual customer, but first, the financial institutions must rely on empirical data that are evaluated consistent with the established, impartial risk-management standards of the financial institution; and(12)anything less is not prudent risk management and may result in unsafe or unsound practices, denial of fair access to financial services, cancelling, or eliminating certain businesses in society, and have a deleterious effect on national security and the national economy.3.PurposeThe purposes of this Act are to—(1)ensure fair access to financial services and fair treatment of customers by financial service providers, including national and State banks, Federal savings associations, and State and Federal credit unions;(2)ensure financial institutions conduct themselves in a safe and sound manner, comply with laws and regulations, treat their customers fairly, and provide fair access to financial services;(3)protect against financial institutions being able to impede otherwise lawful commerce and thereby achieve certain public policy goals;(4)ensure that persons involved in politically unpopular businesses but that are lawful under Federal law receive fair access to financial services under the law; and(5)ensure financial institutions operate in a safe and sound manner by making judgments and decisions about whether to provide a customer with financial services on an impartial, individualized risk-based analysis using empirical data evaluated under quantifiable standards.4.Advances to individual member banks(a)Member banksSection 10B of the Federal Reserve Act ( 12 U.S.C. 347b ) is amended by adding at the end the following:(c)Prohibition on use of discount window lending programsNo member bank with more than $50,000,000,000 in total consolidated assets, or subsidiary of the member bank, may use a discount window lending program if the member bank or subsidiary refuses to do business with any person who is in compliance with the law, including section 8 of the Fair Access to Banking Act ..(b)Insured depository institutionsSection 8(a)(2)(A) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act ( 12 U.S.C. 1818(a)(2)(A) ) is amended—(1)in clause (ii), by striking or at the end;(2)in clause (iii), by striking the comma at the end and inserting ; or ; and(3)by adding at the end the following:(iv)an insured depository institution with more than $500,000,000,000 in total consolidated assets, or subsidiary of the insured depository institution, that refuses to do business with any person who is in compliance with the law, including section 8 of the Fair Access to Banking Act ..(c)Nonmember banks, trust companies, and other depository institutionsSection 13 of the Federal Reserve Act ( 12 U.S.C. 342 ) is amended by inserting Provided further , That no such nonmember bank or trust company or other depository institution with more than $50,000,000,000 in total consolidated assets, or subsidiary of such nonmember bank or trust company or other depository institution, may refuse to do business with any person who is in compliance with the law, including, including section 8 of the Fair Access to Banking Act : after appropriate: .5.Payment card networks(a)DefinitionIn this section, the term payment card network has the meaning given the term in section 921(c) of the Electronic Fund Transfer Act ( 15 U.S.C. 1693o–2(c) ).(b)ProhibitionNo payment card network, including a subsidiary of a payment card network, may, directly or through any agent, processor, or licensed member of the network, by contract, requirement, condition, penalty, or otherwise, prohibit or inhibit the ability of any person who is in compliance with the law, including section 8 of this Act, to obtain access to services or products of the payment card network because of political or reputational risk considerations.(c)Civil penaltyAny payment card network that violates subsection (b) shall be assessed a civil penalty by the Comptroller of the Currency of not more than 10 percent of the value of the services or products described in that subsection, not to exceed $10,000 per violation.6.Credit unionsSection 206(b)(1) of the Federal Credit Union Act ( 12 U.S.C. 1786 ) is amended by inserting or is refusing or has refused, or has a subsidiary that is refusing or has refused, to do business with any person who is in compliance with the law, including section 8 of the Fair Access to Banking Act , after as an insured credit union, .7.Use of automated clearing house network(a)DefinitionsIn this section:(1)Covered credit unionThe term covered credit union means—(A)any insured credit union, as defined in section 101 of the Federal Credit Union Act ( 12 U.S.C. 1752 ); or(B)any credit union that is eligible to make application to become an insured credit union under section 201 of the Federal Credit Union Act ( 12 U.S.C. 1781 ).(2)Member bankThe term member bank has the meaning given the term in the third undesignated paragraph of the first section of the Federal Reserve Act ( 12 U.S.C. 221 ).(b)ProhibitionNo covered credit union, member bank, or State-chartered non-member bank with more than $50,000,000,000 in total consolidated assets, or a subsidiary of the covered credit union, member bank, or State-chartered non-member bank, may use the Automated Clearing House Network if that member bank, credit union, or subsidiary of the member bank or credit union, refuses to do business with any person who is in compliance with the law, including section 8 of this Act.8.Fair access to financial services(a)DefinitionsIn this section:(1)BankThe term bank —(A)means an entity for which the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency is the appropriate Federal banking agency, as defined in section 3 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act ( 12 U.S.C. 1813 ); and(B)includes—(i)member banks;(ii)non-member banks;(iii)covered credit unions;(iv)State-chartered non-member banks; and(v)trust companies.(2)Covered bank(A)In generalThe term covered bank means a bank that has the ability to—(i)raise the price a person has to pay to obtain an offered financial service from the bank or from a competitor; or(ii)significantly impede a person, or the business activities of a person, in favor of or to the advantage of another person.(B)Presumption(i)In generalA bank shall not be presumed to be a covered bank if the bank has less than $50,000,000,000 in total assets.(ii)Rebuttable presumption(I)In generalA bank is presumed to be a covered bank if the bank has $50,000,000,000 or more in total assets.(II)RebuttalA bank that meets the criteria under subclause (I) can seek to rebut this presumption by submitting to the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency written materials that, in the judgement of the agency, demonstrate the bank does not meet the definition of covered bank.(3)Covered credit unionThe term covered credit union means—(A)any insured credit union, as defined in section 101 of the Federal Credit Union Act ( 12 U.S.C. 1752 ); or(B)any credit union that is eligible to make application to become an insured credit union under section 201 of the Federal Credit Union Act ( 12 U.S.C. 1781 ).(4)DenyThe term deny means to deny or refuse to enter into or terminate an existing financial services relationship with a person.(5)Fair access to financial servicesThe term fair access to financial services means persons engaged in activities lawful under Federal law are able to obtain financial services at banks without impediments caused by a prejudice against or dislike for a person or the business of the customer, products or services sold by the person, or favoritism for market alternatives to the business of the person. Refusing to provide or continue to provide financial services to a person because the person engaged in rude or harassing conduct toward an employee of a bank is not a violation of this section.(6)Financial serviceThe term financial service means a financial product or service, including—(A)commercial and merchant banking;(B)lending;(C)financing;(D)leasing;(E)cash, asset and investment management and advisory services;(F)credit card services;(G)payment processing;(H)security and foreign exchange trading and brokerage services; and(I)insurance products.(7)Member bankThe term member bank has the meaning given the term in the third undesignated paragraph of the first section of the Federal Reserve Act ( 12 U.S.C. 221 ).(b)Requirements(1)In generalTo provide fair access to financial services, a covered bank (including a subsidiary of a covered bank), except as necessary to comply with another provision of law—(A)shall make each financial service it offers available to all persons in the geographic market served by the covered bank on proportionally equal terms;(B)may not deny any person a financial service the covered bank offers unless the denial is justified by such quantified and documented failure of the person to meet quantitative, impartial risk-based standards established in advance by the covered bank;(C)may not deny, in coordination with or at the request of others, any person a financial service the covered bank offers; and(D)shall, when denying any person financial services the covered bank offers, provide written justification to the person explaining the basis for the denial, including any specific laws or regulations the covered bank believes are being violated by the person or customer, if any.(2)Justification requirementA justification described in paragraph (1)(D) may not be based solely on the reputational risk to the covered bank.(c)Cause of action for violations of this section(1)In generalNotwithstanding any other provision of law, a person may commence a civil action in the appropriate district court of the United States against any covered bank that violates or fails to comply with the requirements under this Act, for harm that person suffered as a result of such violation.(2)No exhaustionIt shall not be necessary for a person to exhaust its administrative remedies before commencing a civil action under this Act.(3)DamagesIf a person prevails in a civil action under this Act, a court shall award the person—(A)reasonable attorney’s fees and costs; and(B)treble damages.
Tracker
The tracker indicates the progress of this legislation as it moves through the legislative process.
- Introduced2025-02-05
- Passed House
- Passed Senate
- Conference
- To President
- Became Law
CRS Summary
The summaries are the Congressional Research Service’s, one per stage. Read them in full.
Introduced in House Feb 5, 2025
hb987/introduced-in-house.mdShown Here:
Introduced in House (02/05/2025)
Fair Access to Banking Act
This bill places restrictions on certain banks, credit unions, and payment card networks if they refuse to do business with a person who complies with the law. Restrictions include prohibiting the use of electronic funds transfer systems and lending programs, termination of an institution's depository insurance, and specified civil penalties.
Banks and other specified financial institutions are allowed to deny financial services to a person only if the denial is justified by a documented failure of that person to meet quantitative, impartial, risk-based standards established in advance by the institution. This justification may not be based upon reputational risks to the institution.
The bill establishes the right for a person to bring a civil action for a violation of this bill.
Sponsors
Rep. Garland Barr (R) sponsors H.R. 987, and 113 members have co-sponsored it, 4 of them from the day it was introduced.

Rep. · R–KY-6 · Sponsor
Introduced Feb 5, 2025

Rep. · R–GA-9 · Co-sponsor
Joined Feb 5, 2025 · Original

Rep. · R–FL-18 · Co-sponsor
Joined Feb 5, 2025 · Original

Rep. · R–NC-10 · Co-sponsor
Joined Feb 5, 2025 · Original

Rep. · R–PA-9 · Co-sponsor
Joined Feb 5, 2025 · Original

Rep. · R–TX-19 · Co-sponsor
Joined Feb 6, 2025

Rep. · R–WI-5 · Co-sponsor
Joined Feb 6, 2025

Rep. · R–NC-5 · Co-sponsor
Joined Feb 6, 2025

Rep. · R–LA-3 · Co-sponsor
Joined Feb 6, 2025

Rep. · R–FL-16 · Co-sponsor
Joined Feb 10, 2025
Committees
H.R. 987 went before 1 committee: Financial Services.
Actions
H.R. 987 has taken 2 actions since Feb 5, 2025.
| Chamber | Action | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Feb 5, 2025 | House | Introduced in House | ||
Feb 5, 2025 | House | Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.Financial Services Committee |
Votes
H.R. 987 has not gone to a roll call.
Related bills
1 bill is related to H.R. 987.
Titles
H.R. 987 goes by 3 titles, 1 of them short titles.
- Fair Access to Banking Act — Display Title
- Fair Access to Banking Act — Short Title(s) as Introduced
- To amend certain banking laws to prohibit certain financial service providers who deny fair access to financial services from using taxpayer funded discount window lending programs, and for other purposes. — Official Title as Introduced
Lobbying
14 clients hired 15 firms and 74 registered lobbyists who named H.R. 987 in 79 quarterly filings, 2025 to 2026. Reported under the Lobbying Disclosure Act; a filing’s income covers everything its registrant worked that quarter, so the amounts below are the filings’, not this bill’s.
Filed under Financial Institutions/Investments/Securities, Taxation/Internal Revenue Code, Banking, Budget/Appropriations, Law Enforcement/Crime/Criminal Justice, Government Issues, Homeland Security, Firearms/Guns/Ammunition.
Clients
Who paid to be heard, by how many filings named the bill.
| Client | Business | State | Firms | Filings | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BLOCKCHAIN ASSOCIATION | The Blockchain Association is a trade association representing the blockchain industry | District of Columbia | 2 | 9 | $100K |
| NATIONAL SHOOTING SPORTS FOUNDATION | — | District of Columbia | 1 | 9 | — |
| NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA | — | Virginia | 1 | 8 | — |
| ACA INTERNATIONAL | — | District of Columbia | 1 | 7 | — |
| AMERICAN BANKERS ASSOCIATION | — | District of Columbia | 1 | 6 | — |
| CITIGROUP WASHINGTON, INC. | — | District of Columbia | 1 | 6 | — |
| CORECIVIC INC | — | District of Columbia | 1 | 6 | — |
| DIGITAL CURRENCY GROUP | Support bitcoin & blockchain companies by leveraging insights, network & access to capital | Connecticut | 1 | 6 | — |
| GOWEST CREDIT UNION ASSOCIATION | Credit Union Trade Association | Washington | 1 | 6 | — |
| THE GEO GROUP, INC. | — | Florida | 1 | 6 | — |
| CORECIVIC (FORMERLY CCA OF TENNESSEE) | Private Prison Management Services | Tennessee | 1 | 3 | $90K |
| CITIZENS FINANCIAL GROUP INC | — | Rhode Island | 1 | 3 | — |
| DEFI EDUCATION FUND | Education on decentralized finance and achieve regulatory clarity for the DeFi ecosystem. | Virginia | 2 | 2 | $60K |
| SOLANA POLICY INSTITUTE | 501(c)(4) social welfare organization | Virginia | 1 | 2 | — |
Firms
Registrants who filed on the bill, by filings.
Lobbyists
Named on the filings that cite the bill. The 20 named most often, of 74.
| Lobbyist | Firms | Clients | Filings |
|---|---|---|---|
| DIANE CIHOTA CASHOUR | 1 | 1 | 9 |
| JOSEPH BLISS | 1 | 1 | 9 |
| LAWRENCE KEANE | 1 | 1 | 9 |
| PATRICK ROTHWELL | 1 | 1 | 9 |
| SEAN SMITH | 1 | 1 | 9 |
| CHRISTOPHER ZEALAND | 1 | 1 | 8 |
| GORDON SPEED | 1 | 1 | 8 |
| HADAN HATCH | 1 | 1 | 8 |
| JOHN COMMERFORD | 1 | 1 | 8 |
| WILLIAM LANE | 1 | 1 | 8 |
| GEORGE PURCELL | 1 | 1 | 7 |
| KRISTIN SMITH | 2 | 2 | 7 |
| TIMOTHY CHURCHILL | 1 | 1 | 7 |
| ALEX CATANESE | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| ALISON TOUHEY | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| ANTHONY PARDAL | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| BLAKE EARLEY | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| CANDIDA WOLFF | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| CHRIS FISHER | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| EDWARD CONNOR | 1 | 1 | 6 |
Filings
The documents themselves, on the Senate’s Lobbying Disclosure site, largest reported first.
| Client | Registrant | Period | Reported | Document |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMERICAN BANKERS ASSOCIATION | AMERICAN BANKERS ASSOCIATION | 2026 second_quarter | $3.5M | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| AMERICAN BANKERS ASSOCIATION | AMERICAN BANKERS ASSOCIATION | 2026 first_quarter | $3.1M | 1st Quarter - Report |
| NATIONAL SHOOTING SPORTS FOUNDATION | NATIONAL SHOOTING SPORTS FOUNDATION | 2026 first_quarter | $2.3M | 1st Quarter - Amendme… |
| NATIONAL SHOOTING SPORTS FOUNDATION | NATIONAL SHOOTING SPORTS FOUNDATION | 2026 first_quarter | $2.3M | 1st Quarter - Report |
| AMERICAN BANKERS ASSOCIATION | AMERICAN BANKERS ASSOCIATION | 2025 third_quarter | $2.2M | 3rd Quarter - Report |
| NATIONAL SHOOTING SPORTS FOUNDATION | NATIONAL SHOOTING SPORTS FOUNDATION | 2026 second_quarter | $2M | 2nd Quarter - Amendme… |
| NATIONAL SHOOTING SPORTS FOUNDATION | NATIONAL SHOOTING SPORTS FOUNDATION | 2026 second_quarter | $2M | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| AMERICAN BANKERS ASSOCIATION | AMERICAN BANKERS ASSOCIATION | 2025 second_quarter | $2M | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| NATIONAL SHOOTING SPORTS FOUNDATION | NATIONAL SHOOTING SPORTS FOUNDATION | 2025 first_quarter | $1.9M | 1st Quarter - Report |
| NATIONAL SHOOTING SPORTS FOUNDATION | NATIONAL SHOOTING SPORTS FOUNDATION | 2025 third_quarter | $1.8M | 3rd Quarter - Report |
| NATIONAL SHOOTING SPORTS FOUNDATION | NATIONAL SHOOTING SPORTS FOUNDATION | 2025 second_quarter | $1.8M | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| AMERICAN BANKERS ASSOCIATION | AMERICAN BANKERS ASSOCIATION | 2025 first_quarter | $1.7M | 1st Quarter - Report |
| AMERICAN BANKERS ASSOCIATION | AMERICAN BANKERS ASSOCIATION | 2025 fourth_quarter | $1.7M | 4th Quarter - Report |
| NATIONAL SHOOTING SPORTS FOUNDATION | NATIONAL SHOOTING SPORTS FOUNDATION | 2025 fourth_quarter | $1.6M | 4th Quarter - Amendme… |
| NATIONAL SHOOTING SPORTS FOUNDATION | NATIONAL SHOOTING SPORTS FOUNDATION | 2025 fourth_quarter | $1.6M | 4th Quarter - Report |
| CITIGROUP WASHINGTON, INC. | CITIGROUP WASHINGTON, INC. | 2026 first_quarter | $1.5M | 1st Quarter - Report |
| CITIGROUP WASHINGTON, INC. | CITIGROUP WASHINGTON, INC. | 2025 third_quarter | $1.4M | 3rd Quarter - Report |
| CITIGROUP WASHINGTON, INC. | CITIGROUP WASHINGTON, INC. | 2025 first_quarter | $1.4M | 1st Quarter - Report |
| CITIGROUP WASHINGTON, INC. | CITIGROUP WASHINGTON, INC. | 2026 second_quarter | $1.3M | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| CITIGROUP WASHINGTON, INC. | CITIGROUP WASHINGTON, INC. | 2025 fourth_quarter | $1.3M | 4th Quarter - Report |
Classification
The Congressional Research Service files H.R. 987 under Finance and Financial Sector, one of its 31 policy areas.
CRS Subjects
CRS assigns every bill one policy area from its 31; H.R. 987’s is Finance and Financial Sector.
hr987/policy-areas.txtConstitutional authority
The clause the sponsor cites as Congress’s power to enact H.R. 987, as entered in the Congressional Record.
[Congressional Record Volume 171, Number 24 (Wednesday, February 5, 2025)][House]From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]By Mr. BARR:H.R. 987.Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuantto the following:Article 1, Section 8 of the United States Constitution.[Page H505]
Source: congress.gov · legiscan.com
