Search

Search bills, members, committees and pages...

H.R. 987

U.S. HouseIn House Committee

Summary

H.R. 987, the Fair Access to Banking Act, was introduced in the House on Feb 5, 2025 by Rep. Garland Barr (R) with 113 co-sponsors. It was referred to Financial Services, and last saw action on Feb 5, 2025: Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.


Record

Text

H.R. 987 has 113 co-sponsors.

hb987/introduced-in-house.txt
119 HR 987 IH: Fair Access to Banking Act
U.S. House of Representatives
2025-02-05
text/xml
EN
Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.
I 119th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 987 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES February 5, 2025 Mr. Barr (for himself, Mr. Meuser , Mr. Scott Franklin of Florida , Mr. Clyde , and Mr. Harrigan ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services A BILL
To amend certain banking laws to prohibit certain financial service providers who deny fair access to financial services from using taxpayer funded discount window lending programs, and for other purposes.
1.
Short title
This Act may be cited as the Fair Access to Banking Act .
2.
Findings
Congress finds that—
(1)
article I of the Constitution of the United States guarantees the people of the United States the right to enact public policy through the free and fair election of representatives and through the actions of State legislatures and Congress;
(2)
financial institutions rightly objected to the Operation Choke Point initiative through which certain government agencies pressured financial institutions to cut off access to financial services to lawful sectors of the economy;
(3)
in response to pressure from advocates whose policy objectives are served when financial institutions deny certain customers access to financial services, financial institutions are now, however, increasingly employing subjective, category-based evaluations to deny certain persons access to financial services;
(4)
this privatization of the discriminatory practices underlying Operation Choke Point by financial institutions represents as great a threat to the national economy, national security, and the soundness of banking and financial markets in the United States as Operation Choke Point itself;
(5)
financial institutions are supported by the United States taxpayers and enjoy significant privileges in the financial system of the United States and should not be permitted to act as de facto regulators or unelected legislators by withholding financial services to otherwise credit worthy businesses based on subjective political reasons, bias or prejudices;
(6)
financial institutions are not well-equipped to balance risks unrelated to financial exposures and the operations required to deliver financial services;
(7)
the United States taxpayers came to the aid for large financial institutions during the great recession of 2008 because they were deemed too important to the national economy to be permitted to fail;
(8)
when a financial institution predicates the access to financial services of a person on factors or information (such as the lawful products a customer manufactures or sells or the services the customer provides) other than quantitative, impartial risk-based standards, the financial institution has failed to act consistent with basic principles of sound risk management and failed to provide fair access to financial services;
(9)
financial institutions have a responsibility to make decisions about whether to provide a person with financial services on the basis of impartial criteria free from prejudice or favoritism;
(10)
while fair access to financial services does not obligate a financial institution to offer any particular financial service to the public, or to operate in any particular geographic area, or to provide a service the financial institution offers to any particular person, it is necessary that—
(A)
the financial services a financial institution chooses to offer in the geographic areas in which the financial institution operates be made available to all customers based on the quantitative, impartial risk-based standards of the financial institution, and not based on whether the customer is in a particular category of customers;
(B)
financial institutions assess the risks posed by individual customers on a case-by-case basis, rather than category-based assessment; and
(C)
financial institutions implement controls to manage relationships commensurate with these risks associated with each customer, not a strategy of total avoidance of particular industries or categories of customers;
(11)
financial institutions are free to provide or deny financial services to any individual customer, but first, the financial institutions must rely on empirical data that are evaluated consistent with the established, impartial risk-management standards of the financial institution; and
(12)
anything less is not prudent risk management and may result in unsafe or unsound practices, denial of fair access to financial services, cancelling, or eliminating certain businesses in society, and have a deleterious effect on national security and the national economy.
3.
Purpose
The purposes of this Act are to—
(1)
ensure fair access to financial services and fair treatment of customers by financial service providers, including national and State banks, Federal savings associations, and State and Federal credit unions;
(2)
ensure financial institutions conduct themselves in a safe and sound manner, comply with laws and regulations, treat their customers fairly, and provide fair access to financial services;
(3)
protect against financial institutions being able to impede otherwise lawful commerce and thereby achieve certain public policy goals;
(4)
ensure that persons involved in politically unpopular businesses but that are lawful under Federal law receive fair access to financial services under the law; and
(5)
ensure financial institutions operate in a safe and sound manner by making judgments and decisions about whether to provide a customer with financial services on an impartial, individualized risk-based analysis using empirical data evaluated under quantifiable standards.
4.
Advances to individual member banks
(a)
Member banks
Section 10B of the Federal Reserve Act ( 12 U.S.C. 347b ) is amended by adding at the end the following:
(c)
Prohibition on use of discount window lending programs
No member bank with more than $50,000,000,000 in total consolidated assets, or subsidiary of the member bank, may use a discount window lending program if the member bank or subsidiary refuses to do business with any person who is in compliance with the law, including section 8 of the Fair Access to Banking Act .
.
(b)
Insured depository institutions
Section 8(a)(2)(A) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act ( 12 U.S.C. 1818(a)(2)(A) ) is amended—
(1)
in clause (ii), by striking or at the end;
(2)
in clause (iii), by striking the comma at the end and inserting ; or ; and
(3)
by adding at the end the following:
(iv)
an insured depository institution with more than $500,000,000,000 in total consolidated assets, or subsidiary of the insured depository institution, that refuses to do business with any person who is in compliance with the law, including section 8 of the Fair Access to Banking Act .
.
(c)
Nonmember banks, trust companies, and other depository institutions
Section 13 of the Federal Reserve Act ( 12 U.S.C. 342 ) is amended by inserting Provided further , That no such nonmember bank or trust company or other depository institution with more than $50,000,000,000 in total consolidated assets, or subsidiary of such nonmember bank or trust company or other depository institution, may refuse to do business with any person who is in compliance with the law, including, including section 8 of the Fair Access to Banking Act : after appropriate: .
5.
Payment card networks
(a)
Definition
In this section, the term payment card network has the meaning given the term in section 921(c) of the Electronic Fund Transfer Act ( 15 U.S.C. 1693o–2(c) ).
(b)
Prohibition
No payment card network, including a subsidiary of a payment card network, may, directly or through any agent, processor, or licensed member of the network, by contract, requirement, condition, penalty, or otherwise, prohibit or inhibit the ability of any person who is in compliance with the law, including section 8 of this Act, to obtain access to services or products of the payment card network because of political or reputational risk considerations.
(c)
Civil penalty
Any payment card network that violates subsection (b) shall be assessed a civil penalty by the Comptroller of the Currency of not more than 10 percent of the value of the services or products described in that subsection, not to exceed $10,000 per violation.
6.
Credit unions
Section 206(b)(1) of the Federal Credit Union Act ( 12 U.S.C. 1786 ) is amended by inserting or is refusing or has refused, or has a subsidiary that is refusing or has refused, to do business with any person who is in compliance with the law, including section 8 of the Fair Access to Banking Act , after as an insured credit union, .
7.
Use of automated clearing house network
(a)
Definitions
In this section:
(1)
Covered credit union
The term covered credit union means—
(A)
any insured credit union, as defined in section 101 of the Federal Credit Union Act ( 12 U.S.C. 1752 ); or
(B)
any credit union that is eligible to make application to become an insured credit union under section 201 of the Federal Credit Union Act ( 12 U.S.C. 1781 ).
(2)
Member bank
The term member bank has the meaning given the term in the third undesignated paragraph of the first section of the Federal Reserve Act ( 12 U.S.C. 221 ).
(b)
Prohibition
No covered credit union, member bank, or State-chartered non-member bank with more than $50,000,000,000 in total consolidated assets, or a subsidiary of the covered credit union, member bank, or State-chartered non-member bank, may use the Automated Clearing House Network if that member bank, credit union, or subsidiary of the member bank or credit union, refuses to do business with any person who is in compliance with the law, including section 8 of this Act.
8.
Fair access to financial services
(a)
Definitions
In this section:
(1)
Bank
The term bank —
(A)
means an entity for which the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency is the appropriate Federal banking agency, as defined in section 3 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act ( 12 U.S.C. 1813 ); and
(B)
includes—
(i)
member banks;
(ii)
non-member banks;
(iii)
covered credit unions;
(iv)
State-chartered non-member banks; and
(v)
trust companies.
(2)
Covered bank
(A)
In general
The term covered bank means a bank that has the ability to—
(i)
raise the price a person has to pay to obtain an offered financial service from the bank or from a competitor; or
(ii)
significantly impede a person, or the business activities of a person, in favor of or to the advantage of another person.
(B)
Presumption
(i)
In general
A bank shall not be presumed to be a covered bank if the bank has less than $50,000,000,000 in total assets.
(ii)
Rebuttable presumption
(I)
In general
A bank is presumed to be a covered bank if the bank has $50,000,000,000 or more in total assets.
(II)
Rebuttal
A bank that meets the criteria under subclause (I) can seek to rebut this presumption by submitting to the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency written materials that, in the judgement of the agency, demonstrate the bank does not meet the definition of covered bank.
(3)
Covered credit union
The term covered credit union means—
(A)
any insured credit union, as defined in section 101 of the Federal Credit Union Act ( 12 U.S.C. 1752 ); or
(B)
any credit union that is eligible to make application to become an insured credit union under section 201 of the Federal Credit Union Act ( 12 U.S.C. 1781 ).
(4)
Deny
The term deny means to deny or refuse to enter into or terminate an existing financial services relationship with a person.
(5)
Fair access to financial services
The term fair access to financial services means persons engaged in activities lawful under Federal law are able to obtain financial services at banks without impediments caused by a prejudice against or dislike for a person or the business of the customer, products or services sold by the person, or favoritism for market alternatives to the business of the person. Refusing to provide or continue to provide financial services to a person because the person engaged in rude or harassing conduct toward an employee of a bank is not a violation of this section.
(6)
Financial service
The term financial service means a financial product or service, including—
(A)
commercial and merchant banking;
(B)
lending;
(C)
financing;
(D)
leasing;
(E)
cash, asset and investment management and advisory services;
(F)
credit card services;
(G)
payment processing;
(H)
security and foreign exchange trading and brokerage services; and
(I)
insurance products.
(7)
Member bank
The term member bank has the meaning given the term in the third undesignated paragraph of the first section of the Federal Reserve Act ( 12 U.S.C. 221 ).
(b)
Requirements
(1)
In general
To provide fair access to financial services, a covered bank (including a subsidiary of a covered bank), except as necessary to comply with another provision of law—
(A)
shall make each financial service it offers available to all persons in the geographic market served by the covered bank on proportionally equal terms;
(B)
may not deny any person a financial service the covered bank offers unless the denial is justified by such quantified and documented failure of the person to meet quantitative, impartial risk-based standards established in advance by the covered bank;
(C)
may not deny, in coordination with or at the request of others, any person a financial service the covered bank offers; and
(D)
shall, when denying any person financial services the covered bank offers, provide written justification to the person explaining the basis for the denial, including any specific laws or regulations the covered bank believes are being violated by the person or customer, if any.
(2)
Justification requirement
A justification described in paragraph (1)(D) may not be based solely on the reputational risk to the covered bank.
(c)
Cause of action for violations of this section
(1)
In general
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a person may commence a civil action in the appropriate district court of the United States against any covered bank that violates or fails to comply with the requirements under this Act, for harm that person suffered as a result of such violation.
(2)
No exhaustion
It shall not be necessary for a person to exhaust its administrative remedies before commencing a civil action under this Act.
(3)
Damages
If a person prevails in a civil action under this Act, a court shall award the person—
(A)
reasonable attorney’s fees and costs; and
(B)
treble damages.

Tracker

The tracker indicates the progress of this legislation as it moves through the legislative process.

  1. Introduced2025-02-05
  2. Passed House
  3. Passed Senate
  4. Conference
  5. To President
  6. Became Law

CRS Summary

The summaries are the Congressional Research Service’s, one per stage. Read them in full.

Introduced in House Feb 5, 2025

hb987/introduced-in-house.md

Shown Here:
Introduced in House (02/05/2025)

Fair Access to Banking Act

This bill places restrictions on certain banks, credit unions, and payment card networks if they refuse to do business with a person who complies with the law. Restrictions include prohibiting the use of electronic funds transfer systems and lending programs, termination of an institution's depository insurance, and specified civil penalties.

Banks and other specified financial institutions are allowed to deny financial services to a person only if the denial is justified by a documented failure of that person to meet quantitative, impartial, risk-based standards established in advance by the institution. This justification may not be based upon reputational risks to the institution.

The bill establishes the right for a person to bring a civil action for a violation of this bill.

Sponsors

Rep. Garland Barr (R) sponsors H.R. 987, and 113 members have co-sponsored it, 4 of them from the day it was introduced.

Committees

H.R. 987 went before 1 committee: Financial Services.

Financial Services
Financial Services
Referred To · Feb 5, 2025 · 559 Bills

Actions

H.R. 987 has taken 2 actions since Feb 5, 2025.

ChamberAction
Feb 5, 2025
House
Introduced in House
Feb 5, 2025
House
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.Financial Services Committee

Votes

H.R. 987 has not gone to a roll call.

1 bill is related to H.R. 987.

Titles

H.R. 987 goes by 3 titles, 1 of them short titles.

  • Fair Access to Banking Act — Display Title
  • Fair Access to Banking Act — Short Title(s) as Introduced
  • To amend certain banking laws to prohibit certain financial service providers who deny fair access to financial services from using taxpayer funded discount window lending programs, and for other purposes. — Official Title as Introduced

Lobbying

14 clients hired 15 firms and 74 registered lobbyists who named H.R. 987 in 79 quarterly filings, 2025 to 2026. Reported under the Lobbying Disclosure Act; a filing’s income covers everything its registrant worked that quarter, so the amounts below are the filings’, not this bill’s.

Filed under Financial Institutions/Investments/Securities, Taxation/Internal Revenue Code, Banking, Budget/Appropriations, Law Enforcement/Crime/Criminal Justice, Government Issues, Homeland Security, Firearms/Guns/Ammunition.

Clients

Who paid to be heard, by how many filings named the bill.

ClientBusinessStateFirmsFilingsReported
BLOCKCHAIN ASSOCIATIONThe Blockchain Association is a trade association representing the blockchain industryDistrict of Columbia29$100K
NATIONAL SHOOTING SPORTS FOUNDATIONDistrict of Columbia19
NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAVirginia18
ACA INTERNATIONALDistrict of Columbia17
AMERICAN BANKERS ASSOCIATIONDistrict of Columbia16
CITIGROUP WASHINGTON, INC.District of Columbia16
CORECIVIC INCDistrict of Columbia16
DIGITAL CURRENCY GROUPSupport bitcoin & blockchain companies by leveraging insights, network & access to capitalConnecticut16
GOWEST CREDIT UNION ASSOCIATIONCredit Union Trade AssociationWashington16
THE GEO GROUP, INC.Florida16
CORECIVIC (FORMERLY CCA OF TENNESSEE)Private Prison Management ServicesTennessee13$90K
CITIZENS FINANCIAL GROUP INCRhode Island13
DEFI EDUCATION FUNDEducation on decentralized finance and achieve regulatory clarity for the DeFi ecosystem.Virginia22$60K
SOLANA POLICY INSTITUTE501(c)(4) social welfare organizationVirginia12

Firms

Registrants who filed on the bill, by filings.

Lobbyists

Named on the filings that cite the bill. The 20 named most often, of 74.

Filings

The documents themselves, on the Senate’s Lobbying Disclosure site, largest reported first.

ClientRegistrantPeriodReportedDocument
AMERICAN BANKERS ASSOCIATIONAMERICAN BANKERS ASSOCIATION2026 second_quarter$3.5M2nd Quarter - Report
AMERICAN BANKERS ASSOCIATIONAMERICAN BANKERS ASSOCIATION2026 first_quarter$3.1M1st Quarter - Report
NATIONAL SHOOTING SPORTS FOUNDATIONNATIONAL SHOOTING SPORTS FOUNDATION2026 first_quarter$2.3M1st Quarter - Amendme…
NATIONAL SHOOTING SPORTS FOUNDATIONNATIONAL SHOOTING SPORTS FOUNDATION2026 first_quarter$2.3M1st Quarter - Report
AMERICAN BANKERS ASSOCIATIONAMERICAN BANKERS ASSOCIATION2025 third_quarter$2.2M3rd Quarter - Report
NATIONAL SHOOTING SPORTS FOUNDATIONNATIONAL SHOOTING SPORTS FOUNDATION2026 second_quarter$2M2nd Quarter - Amendme…
NATIONAL SHOOTING SPORTS FOUNDATIONNATIONAL SHOOTING SPORTS FOUNDATION2026 second_quarter$2M2nd Quarter - Report
AMERICAN BANKERS ASSOCIATIONAMERICAN BANKERS ASSOCIATION2025 second_quarter$2M2nd Quarter - Report
NATIONAL SHOOTING SPORTS FOUNDATIONNATIONAL SHOOTING SPORTS FOUNDATION2025 first_quarter$1.9M1st Quarter - Report
NATIONAL SHOOTING SPORTS FOUNDATIONNATIONAL SHOOTING SPORTS FOUNDATION2025 third_quarter$1.8M3rd Quarter - Report
NATIONAL SHOOTING SPORTS FOUNDATIONNATIONAL SHOOTING SPORTS FOUNDATION2025 second_quarter$1.8M2nd Quarter - Report
AMERICAN BANKERS ASSOCIATIONAMERICAN BANKERS ASSOCIATION2025 first_quarter$1.7M1st Quarter - Report
AMERICAN BANKERS ASSOCIATIONAMERICAN BANKERS ASSOCIATION2025 fourth_quarter$1.7M4th Quarter - Report
NATIONAL SHOOTING SPORTS FOUNDATIONNATIONAL SHOOTING SPORTS FOUNDATION2025 fourth_quarter$1.6M4th Quarter - Amendme…
NATIONAL SHOOTING SPORTS FOUNDATIONNATIONAL SHOOTING SPORTS FOUNDATION2025 fourth_quarter$1.6M4th Quarter - Report
CITIGROUP WASHINGTON, INC.CITIGROUP WASHINGTON, INC.2026 first_quarter$1.5M1st Quarter - Report
CITIGROUP WASHINGTON, INC.CITIGROUP WASHINGTON, INC.2025 third_quarter$1.4M3rd Quarter - Report
CITIGROUP WASHINGTON, INC.CITIGROUP WASHINGTON, INC.2025 first_quarter$1.4M1st Quarter - Report
CITIGROUP WASHINGTON, INC.CITIGROUP WASHINGTON, INC.2026 second_quarter$1.3M2nd Quarter - Report
CITIGROUP WASHINGTON, INC.CITIGROUP WASHINGTON, INC.2025 fourth_quarter$1.3M4th Quarter - Report

Classification

The Congressional Research Service files H.R. 987 under Finance and Financial Sector, one of its 31 policy areas.

CRS Subjects

CRS assigns every bill one policy area from its 31; H.R. 987’s is Finance and Financial Sector.

hr987/policy-areas.txt
Finance and Financial SectorAgriculture and FoodAnimalsArmed Forces and National SecurityArts, Culture, ReligionCivil Rights and Liberties, Minority IssuesCommerceCongressCrime and Law EnforcementEconomics and Public FinanceEducationEmergency ManagementEnergyEnvironmental ProtectionFamiliesForeign Trade and International FinanceGovernment Operations and PoliticsHealthHousing and Community DevelopmentImmigrationInternational AffairsLabor and EmploymentLawNative AmericansPublic Lands and Natural ResourcesScience, Technology, CommunicationsSocial WelfareSports and RecreationTaxationTransportation and Public WorksWater Resources Development

Constitutional authority

The clause the sponsor cites as Congress’s power to enact H.R. 987, as entered in the Congressional Record.

[Congressional Record Volume 171, Number 24 (Wednesday, February 5, 2025)][House]From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]By Mr. BARR:H.R. 987.Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuantto the following:Article 1, Section 8 of the United States Constitution.[Page H505]

Source: congress.gov · legiscan.com