- H.R. 10171August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10156August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10172August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10160August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10181August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10176August 27, 2026
- H.Res. 1496August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10164August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10170August 27, 2026
- H.Res. 1494August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10163August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10157August 27, 2026
- Administration
- Agriculture
- Agriculture, Nutrition, And Forestry
- Appropriations
- Armed Services
- Banking, Housing, And Urban Affairs
- Budget
- Commerce, Science, And Transportation
- Education and Workforce
- Energy And Commerce
- Energy And Natural Resources
- Environment And Public Works
- Ethics
- Finance
- Financial Services
- Foreign Affairs
- Foreign Relations
- Health, Education, Labor, And Pensions
- Homeland Security
- Homeland Security And Governmental Affa…
- Indian Affairs
- Indian and Insular Affairs
- Intelligence
- Judiciary
- Natural Resources
- Oversight And Government Reform
- Permanent Select Intelligence
- Rules
- Rules And Administration
- Science, Space, And Technology
- Select Intelligence
- Small Business
- Small Business And Entrepreneurship
- Subcommittee on Aviation
- Subcommittee on Border Security and Enf…
- Subcommittee on Coast Guard and Maritim…
- Subcommittee on Commodity Markets, Digi…
- Subcommittee on Conservation, Research,…
- Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and In…
- Subcommittee on Cybersecurity and Infra…
- Subcommittee on Disability Assistance a…
- Subcommittee on Economic Development, P…
- Subcommittee on Economic Opportunity
- Subcommittee on Emergency Management an…
- Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Reso…
- Subcommittee on Federal Lands
- Subcommittee on Forestry and Horticultu…
- Subcommittee on General Farm Commoditie…
- Subcommittee on Health
- Subcommittee on Highways and Transit
- Subcommittee on Livestock, Dairy, and P…
- Subcommittee on Nutrition and Foreign A…
- Subcommittee on Oversight and Investiga…
- Subcommittee on Oversight, Investigatio…
- Subcommittee on Railroads, Pipelines, a…
- Subcommittee on Transportation and Mari…
- Subcommittee on Water Resources and Env…
- Subcommittee on Water, Wildlife and Fis…
- Transportation And Infrastructure
- Veterans' Affairs
- Ways And Means

H.Res. 100
U.S. House•In House Committee
Summary
H.Res. 100, “Expressing support for the continued value of arms control agreements and negotiated constraints on Russian and Chinese strategic nuclear forces”, was introduced in the House on Feb 4, 2025 by Rep. Bill Foster (D) with 31 co-sponsors. It was referred to Foreign Affairs, and last saw action on Feb 4, 2025: Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Record
Text
H.Res. 100 has 31 co-sponsors.
hr100/introduced-in-house.txt119 HRES 100 IH: Expressing support for the continued value of arms control agreements and negotiated constraints on Russian and Chinese strategic nuclear forces.U.S. House of Representatives2025-02-04text/xmlENPursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.IV 119th CONGRESS 1st Session H. RES. 100 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES February 4, 2025 Mr. Foster (for himself, Mr. Beyer , Mr. Garamendi , Ms. Garcia of Texas , Mr. Khanna , Mr. McGovern , Mr. Meeks , Mr. Nadler , Ms. Norton , Mr. Quigley , Ms. Tlaib , Mr. Vargas , Mr. Casten , and Ms. Titus ) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs RESOLUTIONExpressing support for the continued value of arms control agreements and negotiated constraints on Russian and Chinese strategic nuclear forces.Whereas the United States maintains bipartisan support to ensure national security and the defense of United States allies and partners;Whereas President Reagan stated that a nuclear war cannot be won and must never be fought in his 1984 State of the Union Address, and affirmed the conviction with Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev in 1985;Whereas, in January 2022, President Biden joined the leaders of the People’s Republic of China, the French Republic, the Russian Federation, and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to reaffirm that a nuclear war cannot be won and must never be fought ;Whereas the Russian Federation illegally invaded Ukraine on February 24, 2022, and has used veiled and blatant nuclear saber rattling in service of its war of aggression against a sovereign state;Whereas the war has led to thousands of casualties, including over 40,000 civilians and more than 650 children killed, along with the displacement of over 10,000,000 Ukrainians;Whereas the Russian Federation’s illegal war against Ukraine represents the greatest threat to European security and freedom in a generation;Whereas, on February 27, 2022, Russian President Putin ordered his military to put Russia’s nuclear forces on special combat readiness in an escalatory response to the United States and its Western Allies unequivocal condemnation of the Russian Federation’s illegal invasion of Ukraine;Whereas, on September 21, 2022, President Putin warned he was not bluffing when he said Russia has various weapons of mass destruction and will use all the means available to us to defend its territory shortly before annexing additional Ukrainian lands through referendums ;Whereas, in February 2021, the United States and the Russian Federation extended the treaty between the United States of America and the Russian Federation on Measures for the Further Reduction and Limitation of Strategic Offensive Arms, also known as the New START Treaty, for 5 years until February 5, 2026;Whereas, on February 21, 2023, President Putin announced the Russian Federation’s purported suspension of the New START Treaty, the last major remaining bilateral nuclear arms control agreement, in a move deemed legally invalid by the United States;Whereas the New START Treaty has had bipartisan support and limits the Russian nuclear arsenal to 1,550 warheads on no more than 700 deployed delivery vehicles, and to 800 deployed and nondeployed strategic launchers;Whereas the New START Treaty has permitted robust and strict transparency and verification measures and onsite inspections, which have provided valuable insight into Russia’s nuclear arsenal;Whereas the United States has decades of bipartisan leadership in nuclear arms control, including cooperation with the Soviet Union and the Russian Federation even when relations were strained;Whereas, in June 2023, the United States Government announced it is now ready to engage in a dialogue with the Russian Federation on a post-2026 nuclear arms control framework and is prepared to stick to the central limits as long as Russia does while also stating a willingness to engage in bilateral arms control discussions with the Russian Federation and the People’s Republic of China without preconditions ;Whereas the Department of State said in a report to Congress released in January 2024 that The United States assesses that the Russian Federation likely did not exceed the New START Treaty’s deployed warhead limit in 2023 ;Whereas Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said September 28, 2024, at a United Nations General Assembly meeting that Russia continues to comply with the New START Treaty numerical limits;Whereas the nuclear weapon states recognized by the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), including the Russian Federation, the United States, as well as the People’s Republic of China, have an obligation to pursue negotiations in good faith on effective measures relating to cessation of the nuclear arms race at an early date and to nuclear disarmament ;Whereas, in November 2023, senior United States and Chinese officials held a candid and in-depth discussion on issues related to arms control and nonproliferation as part of ongoing efforts to maintain open lines of communication and responsibly manage the U.S.-PRC relationship ; andWhereas the absence of agreed limits on the United States and Russian strategic nuclear arsenals after the expiration of the New START Treaty would affect strategic stability and increase the risk of a costly and unrestrained nuclear arms race: Now, therefore, be itThat the House of Representatives—(1)condemns in the strongest terms the use of nuclear escalatory rhetoric and veiled threats to potentially use nuclear weapons in the context of the illegal invasion of a free and independent Ukraine;(2)condemns the Russian Federation’s purported suspension of its participation in the New START Treaty;(3)calls for immediate cessation of nuclear saber rattling and nuclear escalatory rhetoric from the Russian Federation, or by any other nuclear-armed state;(4)emphasizes the continued value of arms control agreements between the United States and the Russian Federation, which possess the world’s largest nuclear arsenals;(5)calls for the Russian Federation to promptly return to full implementation of the New START Treaty, including onsite inspections, provision of treaty-mandated notifications and data, and resumption of Bilateral Consultative Commission meetings;(6)calls on the administration to continue to actively pursue a dialogue with the Russian Federation on a new nuclear arms control framework and on risk reduction in order to maintain strategic stability, ensure the conflict in Ukraine does not escalate to nuclear use, and avoid an unrestrained nuclear arms race following the expiration of the New START Treaty;(7)calls upon the United States and the Russian Federation to continue to respect the numerical constraints on the strategic deployed nuclear forces established by the New START Treaty until such time as a new nuclear arms control framework is established; and(8)calls on the administration to continue to engage the People’s Republic of China in further bilateral talks on nuclear risk reduction and arms control, and to pursue new multilateral arms control efforts.
Tracker
The tracker indicates the progress of this legislation as it moves through the legislative process.
- Introduced2025-02-04
- Passed House
CRS Summary
The summaries are the Congressional Research Service’s, one per stage. Read them in full.
Introduced in House Feb 4, 2025
hr100/introduced-in-house.mdShown Here:
Introduced in House (02/04/2025)
This resolution condemns Russia's nuclear escalatory rhetoric and implied threats on the potential use of nuclear weapons in the context of its invasion of Ukraine. The resolution also (1) condemns Russia's purported suspension of participation in the New START Treaty, (2) emphasizes the value of arms control agreements between the United States and Russia, and (3) calls on the administration to continue pursuing nuclear arms control and risk reduction with Russia and China.
Sponsors
Rep. Bill Foster (D) sponsors H.Res. 100, and 31 members have co-sponsored it, 13 of them from the day it was introduced.

Rep. · D–IL-11 · Sponsor
Introduced Feb 4, 2025

Rep. · D–DC-0 · Co-sponsor
Joined Feb 4, 2025 · Original

Rep. · D–VA-8 · Co-sponsor
Joined Feb 4, 2025 · Original

Rep. · D–IL-6 · Co-sponsor
Joined Feb 4, 2025 · Original

Rep. · D–CA-8 · Co-sponsor
Joined Feb 4, 2025 · Original

Rep. · D–TX-29 · Co-sponsor
Joined Feb 4, 2025 · Original

Rep. · D–CA-17 · Co-sponsor
Joined Feb 4, 2025 · Original

Rep. · D–MA-2 · Co-sponsor
Joined Feb 4, 2025 · Original

Rep. · D–NY-5 · Co-sponsor
Joined Feb 4, 2025 · Original

Rep. · D–NY-12 · Co-sponsor
Joined Feb 4, 2025 · Original
Committees
H.Res. 100 went before 1 committee: Foreign Affairs.
Actions
H.Res. 100 has taken 2 actions since Feb 4, 2025.
| Chamber | Action | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Feb 4, 2025 | House | Submitted in House | ||
Feb 4, 2025 | House | Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.Foreign Affairs Committee |
Votes
H.Res. 100 has not gone to a roll call.
Related bills
1 bill is related to H.Res. 100, as Identical bill.
Titles
H.Res. 100 goes by 2 titles.
- Expressing support for the continued value of arms control agreements and negotiated constraints on Russian and Chinese strategic nuclear forces. — Display Title
- Expressing support for the continued value of arms control agreements and negotiated constraints on Russian and Chinese strategic nuclear forces. — Official Title as Introduced
Lobbying
1 client hired 1 firm and 25 registered lobbyists who named H.Res. 100 in 12 quarterly filings, 2025 to 2026. Reported under the Lobbying Disclosure Act; a filing’s income covers everything its registrant worked that quarter, so the amounts below are the filings’, not this bill’s.
Filed under Agriculture, Budget/Appropriations, Defense, Foreign Relations, Immigration, Indian/Native American Affairs, Taxation/Internal Revenue Code, Civil Rights/Civil Liberties.
Clients
Who paid to be heard, by how many filings named the bill.
| Client | Business | State | Firms | Filings | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FRIENDS COMMITTEE ON NATIONAL LEGISLATION | — | District of Columbia | 1 | 12 | — |
Firms
Registrants who filed on the bill, by filings.
| Registrant | Clients | Filings | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| FRIENDS COMMITTEE ON NATIONAL LEGISLATION | 1 | 12 | — |
Lobbyists
Named on the filings that cite the bill. The 20 named most often, of 25.
| Lobbyist | Firms | Clients | Filings |
|---|---|---|---|
| ALLEN HESTER | 1 | 1 | 12 |
| AMELIA KEGAN | 1 | 1 | 12 |
| ANIKA FORREST | 1 | 1 | 12 |
| BRIDGET MOIX | 1 | 1 | 12 |
| HASSAN EL-TAYYAB | 1 | 1 | 12 |
| HEATHER BRANDON-BRAVO | 1 | 1 | 12 |
| JOSE MORENO | 1 | 1 | 12 |
| ODELIYA MATTER | 1 | 1 | 12 |
| RACHEL OVERSTREET | 1 | 1 | 12 |
| URSALA KNUDSEN-LATTA | 1 | 1 | 12 |
| KAYLIN HENDERSON | 1 | 1 | 10 |
| PAUL AVERSA | 1 | 1 | 10 |
| PRIYA MORAN | 1 | 1 | 10 |
| DAREN CAUGHRON | 1 | 1 | 9 |
| MARIA MITRI | 1 | 1 | 8 |
| ALEXANDRA MORK | 1 | 1 | 7 |
| ANNA AGUTO | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| DEVRA BAXTER | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| JACQUELINE KLINE | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| KATHERINE JONES | 1 | 1 | 4 |
Filings
The documents themselves, on the Senate’s Lobbying Disclosure site, largest reported first.
| Client | Registrant | Period | Reported | Document |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FRIENDS COMMITTEE ON NATIONAL LEGISLATION | FRIENDS COMMITTEE ON NATIONAL LEGISLATION | 2026 second_quarter | $1M | 2nd Quarter - Amendme… |
| FRIENDS COMMITTEE ON NATIONAL LEGISLATION | FRIENDS COMMITTEE ON NATIONAL LEGISLATION | 2026 second_quarter | $1M | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| FRIENDS COMMITTEE ON NATIONAL LEGISLATION | FRIENDS COMMITTEE ON NATIONAL LEGISLATION | 2026 first_quarter | $1M | 1st Quarter - Amendme… |
| FRIENDS COMMITTEE ON NATIONAL LEGISLATION | FRIENDS COMMITTEE ON NATIONAL LEGISLATION | 2026 first_quarter | $1M | 1st Quarter - Report |
| FRIENDS COMMITTEE ON NATIONAL LEGISLATION | FRIENDS COMMITTEE ON NATIONAL LEGISLATION | 2025 fourth_quarter | $1M | 4th Quarter - Amendme… |
| FRIENDS COMMITTEE ON NATIONAL LEGISLATION | FRIENDS COMMITTEE ON NATIONAL LEGISLATION | 2025 fourth_quarter | $1M | 4th Quarter - Amendme… |
| FRIENDS COMMITTEE ON NATIONAL LEGISLATION | FRIENDS COMMITTEE ON NATIONAL LEGISLATION | 2025 fourth_quarter | $1M | 4th Quarter - Amendme… |
| FRIENDS COMMITTEE ON NATIONAL LEGISLATION | FRIENDS COMMITTEE ON NATIONAL LEGISLATION | 2025 fourth_quarter | $1M | 4th Quarter - Report |
| FRIENDS COMMITTEE ON NATIONAL LEGISLATION | FRIENDS COMMITTEE ON NATIONAL LEGISLATION | 2025 third_quarter | $1M | 3rd Quarter - Amendme… |
| FRIENDS COMMITTEE ON NATIONAL LEGISLATION | FRIENDS COMMITTEE ON NATIONAL LEGISLATION | 2025 third_quarter | $1M | 3rd Quarter - Report |
| FRIENDS COMMITTEE ON NATIONAL LEGISLATION | FRIENDS COMMITTEE ON NATIONAL LEGISLATION | 2025 second_quarter | $1M | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| FRIENDS COMMITTEE ON NATIONAL LEGISLATION | FRIENDS COMMITTEE ON NATIONAL LEGISLATION | 2025 first_quarter | $1M | 1st Quarter - Report |
Classification
The Congressional Research Service files H.Res. 100 under International Affairs, one of its 31 policy areas.
CRS Subjects
CRS assigns every bill one policy area from its 31; H.Res. 100’s is International Affairs.
hres100/policy-areas.txtSource: congress.gov · legiscan.com
