Search

Search bills, members, committees and pages...

S. 122

U.S. SenateIn Senate Committee

Summary

S. 122, the Qualified Immunity Act of 2025, was introduced in the Senate on Jan 16, 2025 by Sen. Jim Banks (R) with 10 co-sponsors. It was referred to Judiciary, and last saw action on Jan 16, 2025: Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.


Record

Text

S. 122 has 10 co-sponsors.

sb122/introduced-in-senate.txt
119 S122 IS: Qualified Immunity Act of 2025
U.S. Senate
2025-01-16
text/xml
EN
Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.
II 119th CONGRESS 1st Session S. 122 IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES January 16, 2025 Mr. Banks (for himself, Mr. Budd , Mr. Scott of Florida , Mrs. Blackburn , Mr. Sheehy , Mr. Crapo , Mrs. Hyde-Smith , Mr. Mullin , and Mr. Risch ) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary A BILL
To amend the Revised Statutes to codify the defense of qualified immunity in the case of any action under section 1979, and for other purposes.
1.
Short title
This Act may be cited as the Qualified Immunity Act of 2025 .
2.
Findings
Congress finds the following:
(1)
Qualified immunity is intended for all but the plainly incompetent or those who knowingly violate the law and is meant to give government officials breathing room to make reasonable mistakes of fact and law.
(2)
The Supreme Court of the United States has observed that qualified immunity balances 2 important interests: The need to hold law enforcement officers accountable when they exercise power irresponsibly and the need to shield officers from harassment, distraction, and liability when they perform their duties reasonably.
3.
Codification of qualified immunity
(a)
In general
Section 1979 of the Revised Statutes ( 42 U.S.C. 1983 ) is amended—
(1)
by striking Every and inserting
(a) In general— Every ; and
(2)
by adding at the end the following:
(b)
Applicability to law enforcement officers
(1)
Definitions
In this subsection:
(A)
Law enforcement agency
The term law enforcement agency means any Federal, State, Tribal, or local public agency—
(i)
engaged in supervision, prevention, detection, investigation, or the incarceration of any person for any violation of law; and
(ii)
that has the statutory powers of arrest or apprehension.
(B)
Law enforcement officer
The term law enforcement officer —
(i)
means any Federal, State, Tribal, or local official who—
(I)
is authorized by law to engage in or supervise the prevention, detection, investigation, or the incarceration of any person for any violation of law; and
(II)
has the statutory powers of arrest or apprehension; and
(ii)
includes police officers and other agents of a law enforcement agency.
(2)
No liability
(A)
Law enforcement officers
A law enforcement officer subject to an action under this section in their individual capacity shall not be found liable if such law enforcement officer establishes that—
(i)
the right, privilege, or immunity secured by the Constitution or Federal law was not clearly established at the time of their deprivation by the law enforcement officer, or that at this time, the state of the law was not sufficiently clear that any reasonable law enforcement officer would have understood that the conduct alleged constituted a violation of the Constitution or Federal law; or
(ii)
a court of competent jurisdiction had issued a final decision on the merits holding, without reversal, vacatur, or preemption, that the specific conduct alleged to be unlawful was consistent with the Constitution and Federal laws.
(B)
Law enforcement agencies and units of local government
A law enforcement agency or unit of local government who employed a law enforcement officer subject to an action under subsection (a), shall not be liable for such action if the law enforcement officer—
(i)
is found not liable under paragraph (1); and
(ii)
was acting within the scope of their employment.
.
(b)
Effective date
The amendments made under subsection (a) shall take effect on the date that is 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act.

Tracker

The tracker indicates the progress of this legislation as it moves through the legislative process.

  1. Introduced2025-01-16
  2. Passed Senate
  3. Passed House
  4. Conference
  5. To President
  6. Became Law

CRS Summary

The summaries are the Congressional Research Service’s, one per stage. Read them in full.

Introduced in Senate Jan 16, 2025

sb122/introduced-in-senate.md

Shown Here:
Introduced in Senate (01/16/2025)

Qualified Immunity Act of 2025

This bill provides statutory authority for qualified immunity for law enforcement officers in civil cases involving constitutional violations.

Current law provides a statutory civil cause of action against state and local government actors (e.g., law enforcement officers) for violations of constitutional rights, also known as Section 1983 lawsuits. The Supreme Court has also found an implied cause of action against federal law enforcement officers in certain situations (e.g., Fourth Amendment violations), also known as Bivens lawsuits. However, under the judicial doctrine of qualified immunity, government officials performing discretionary duties are generally shielded from civil liability, unless their actions violate clearly established rights of which a reasonable person would have known.

The bill provides statutory authority for these principles with respect to law enforcement officers. Specifically, under the bill, law enforcement officers are entitled to qualified immunity if (1) at the time of the alleged violation, the constitutional right at issue was not clearly established or the state of the law was not sufficiently clear that any reasonable officer would have known that the conduct was unconstitutional; or (2) a court has held that the specific conduct at issue is constitutional.

The bill applies to federal, state, and local law enforcement officers. It also specifies that law enforcement agencies and local governments may not be held liable if their officers are entitled to qualified immunity.

Sponsors

Sen. Jim Banks (R) sponsors S. 122, and 10 members have co-sponsored it, 8 of them from the day it was introduced.

Committees

S. 122 went before 1 committee: Judiciary.

Judiciary
Judiciary
Referred To · Jan 16, 2025

Actions

S. 122 has taken 2 actions since Jan 16, 2025.

ChamberAction
Jan 16, 2025
Senate
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.Judiciary Committee
Jan 16, 2025
Introduced in Senate

Votes

S. 122 has not gone to a roll call.

1 bill is related to S. 122.

Titles

S. 122 goes by 3 titles, 1 of them short titles.

  • Qualified Immunity Act of 2025 — Display Title
  • Qualified Immunity Act of 2025 — Short Title(s) as Introduced
  • A bill to amend the Revised Statutes to codify the defense of qualified immunity in the case of any action under section 1979, and for other purposes. — Official Title as Introduced

Lobbying

4 clients hired 4 firms and 18 registered lobbyists who named S. 122 in 22 quarterly filings, 2025 to 2026. Reported under the Lobbying Disclosure Act; a filing’s income covers everything its registrant worked that quarter, so the amounts below are the filings’, not this bill’s.

Filed under Law Enforcement/Crime/Criminal Justice, Labor Issues/Antitrust/Workplace, Retirement, Firearms/Guns/Ammunition, Budget/Appropriations, Housing, Taxation/Internal Revenue Code, Health Issues.

Clients

Who paid to be heard, by how many filings named the bill.

ClientBusinessStateFirmsFilingsReported
NATIONAL FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICEDistrict of Columbia110
NATIONAL TROOPERS COALITION42 Member Associations in 45 states representing over 45,000 State Troopers nationwideDistrict of Columbia16$60K
LOUISIANA SHERIFFS' ASSOCIATIONLaw Enforcement AssociationLouisiana15$50K
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNIONDistrict of Columbia11

Firms

Registrants who filed on the bill, by filings.

Lobbyists

Named on the filings that cite the bill.

Filings

The documents themselves, on the Senate’s Lobbying Disclosure site, largest reported first.

ClientRegistrantPeriodReportedDocument
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNIONAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION2025 second_quarter$640K2nd Quarter - Report
NATIONAL FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICENATIONAL FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE2026 second_quarter$100K2nd Quarter - Report
NATIONAL FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICENATIONAL FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE2026 first_quarter$100K1st Quarter - Report
NATIONAL FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICENATIONAL FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE2025 fourth_quarter$100K4th Quarter - Amendme…
NATIONAL FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICENATIONAL FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE2025 third_quarter$100K3rd Quarter - Amendme…
NATIONAL FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICENATIONAL FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE2025 second_quarter$100K2nd Quarter - Amendme…
NATIONAL FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICENATIONAL FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE2025 first_quarter$100K1st Quarter - Amendme…
NATIONAL FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICENATIONAL FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE2025 fourth_quarter$100K4th Quarter - Report
NATIONAL FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICENATIONAL FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE2025 third_quarter$100K3rd Quarter - Report
NATIONAL FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICENATIONAL FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE2025 second_quarter$100K2nd Quarter - Report
NATIONAL FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICENATIONAL FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE2025 first_quarter$100K1st Quarter - Report
NATIONAL TROOPERS COALITIONWINNING STRATEGIES WASHINGTON2026 second_quarter$10K2nd Quarter - Report
NATIONAL TROOPERS COALITIONWINNING STRATEGIES WASHINGTON2026 first_quarter$10K1st Quarter - Report
LOUISIANA SHERIFFS' ASSOCIATIONDOUCET CONSULTING SOLUTIONS, LLC2026 first_quarter$10K1st Quarter - Report
NATIONAL TROOPERS COALITIONWINNING STRATEGIES WASHINGTON2025 fourth_quarter$10K4th Quarter - Report
LOUISIANA SHERIFFS' ASSOCIATIONDOUCET CONSULTING SOLUTIONS, LLC2025 fourth_quarter$10K4th Quarter - Report
NATIONAL TROOPERS COALITIONWINNING STRATEGIES WASHINGTON2025 third_quarter$10K3rd Quarter - Report
LOUISIANA SHERIFFS' ASSOCIATIONDOUCET CONSULTING SOLUTIONS, LLC2025 third_quarter$10K3rd Quarter - Report
NATIONAL TROOPERS COALITIONWINNING STRATEGIES WASHINGTON2025 second_quarter$10K2nd Quarter - Report
LOUISIANA SHERIFFS' ASSOCIATIONDOUCET CONSULTING SOLUTIONS, LLC2025 second_quarter$10K2nd Quarter - Report

Classification

The Congressional Research Service files S. 122 under Civil Rights and Liberties, Minority Issues, one of its 31 policy areas, and gives it 5 legislative subjects.

CRS Subjects

CRS assigns every bill one policy area from its 31; S. 122’s is Civil Rights and Liberties, Minority Issues.

s122/policy-areas.txt
Civil Rights and Liberties, Minority IssuesAgriculture and FoodAnimalsArmed Forces and National SecurityArts, Culture, ReligionCommerceCongressCrime and Law EnforcementEconomics and Public FinanceEducationEmergency ManagementEnergyEnvironmental ProtectionFamiliesFinance and Financial SectorForeign Trade and International FinanceGovernment Operations and PoliticsHealthHousing and Community DevelopmentImmigrationInternational AffairsLabor and EmploymentLawNative AmericansPublic Lands and Natural ResourcesScience, Technology, CommunicationsSocial WelfareSports and RecreationTaxationTransportation and Public WorksWater Resources Development

Legislative Subjects

S. 122 carries 5 of CRS’s legislative subjects, from Civil actions and liability to Law enforcement officers.

s122/subjects.txt
Civil actions and liabilityConstitution and constitutional amendmentsDue process and equal protectionGovernment liabilityLaw enforcement officers

Source: congress.gov · legiscan.com