H.R. 377

119 HR 377 IH: Regulation Reduction Act of 2025
 U.S. House of Representatives
 2025-01-14
 text/xml
 EN
 Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.
 I  119th CONGRESS  1st Session  H. R. 377  IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES   January 14, 2025   Mrs. Bice  (for herself,  Mr. Amodei of Nevada ,  Mr. Feenstra ,  Ms. Hageman ,  Mr. Cline ,  Mr. Cloud ,  Mr. Moore of Alabama ,  Mr. Ellzey ,  Mr. Tiffany ,  Mr. Weber of Texas ,  Mr. Moylan ,  Mr. Crenshaw ,  Mr. Wilson of South Carolina ,  Ms. Tenney ,  Mr. Collins ,  Mr. Self ,  Mr. Rulli , and  Mr. Smith of Nebraska ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the  Committee on Oversight and Government Reform , and in addition to the Committee on  the Judiciary , for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned   A BILL
To require agencies to repeal three existing regulations before issuing a new regulation, and for other purposes.
1.
Short title
This Act may be cited as the   Regulation Reduction Act of 2025  .
2.
Repeal of regulations required before issuance of a new rule
(1)
Requirement for rule
An agency may not issue a rule unless such agency has repealed three or more rules described in paragraph (4) that, to the extent practicable, are related to the rule.
(2)
Requirement for major rule
(A)
Repeal required
An agency may not issue a major rule unless—
(i)
such agency has repealed three or more rules described in paragraph (4) that, to the extent practicable, are related to the major rule; and
(ii)
the cost of the new major rule is less than or equal to the cost of the rules repealed.
(B)
Certified cost
For any rule issued in accordance with subparagraph (A), the Administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs of the Office of Management and Budget must have certified that the cost of the new major rule is equal to or less that the cost of the rules repealed.
(3)
Publication required
Any rule repealed under paragraph (1) or (2) shall be published in the Federal Register.
(4)
Applicability
This section—
(A)
applies to any rule or major rule that imposes a cost or responsibility on a nongovernmental person or a State or local government; and
(B)
shall not apply to any rule or major rule—
(i)
that relates to the internal policy or practice of an agency or procurement by the agency; or
(ii)
that is being revised to be less burdensome to decrease requirements imposed by the rule or cost of compliance.
(5)
Review of agency rules
Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the head of each agency shall submit to Congress and the Director of the Office of Management and Budget a report that includes a review of each rule of the agency that identifies whether that rule is costly, ineffective, duplicative, or outdated, including a list of any other unnecessary regulatory restriction of the agency that is costly, ineffective, duplicative, or outdated.
(6)
Definitions
In this section:
(A)
Agency
The term  agency  has the meaning given that term in section 551 of title 5, United States Code.
(B)
Major rule
The term  major rule  has the meaning given that term in section 804 of title 5, United States Code.
(C)
Rule
The term  rule  has the meaning given that term in section 551 of title 5, United States Code.
(D)
State
The term  State  means each of the several States, the District of Columbia, each territory or possession of the United States, and each federally recognized Indian Tribe.