- H.R. 10171August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10156August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10172August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10160August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10181August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10176August 27, 2026
- H.Res. 1496August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10164August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10170August 27, 2026
- H.Res. 1494August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10163August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10157August 27, 2026
- Administration
- Agriculture
- Agriculture, Nutrition, And Forestry
- Appropriations
- Armed Services
- Banking, Housing, And Urban Affairs
- Budget
- Commerce, Science, And Transportation
- Education and Workforce
- Energy And Commerce
- Energy And Natural Resources
- Environment And Public Works
- Ethics
- Finance
- Financial Services
- Foreign Affairs
- Foreign Relations
- Health, Education, Labor, And Pensions
- Homeland Security
- Homeland Security And Governmental Affa…
- Indian Affairs
- Indian and Insular Affairs
- Intelligence
- Judiciary
- Natural Resources
- Oversight And Government Reform
- Permanent Select Intelligence
- Rules
- Rules And Administration
- Science, Space, And Technology
- Select Intelligence
- Small Business
- Small Business And Entrepreneurship
- Subcommittee on Aviation
- Subcommittee on Border Security and Enf…
- Subcommittee on Coast Guard and Maritim…
- Subcommittee on Commodity Markets, Digi…
- Subcommittee on Conservation, Research,…
- Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and In…
- Subcommittee on Cybersecurity and Infra…
- Subcommittee on Disability Assistance a…
- Subcommittee on Economic Development, P…
- Subcommittee on Economic Opportunity
- Subcommittee on Emergency Management an…
- Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Reso…
- Subcommittee on Federal Lands
- Subcommittee on Forestry and Horticultu…
- Subcommittee on General Farm Commoditie…
- Subcommittee on Health
- Subcommittee on Highways and Transit
- Subcommittee on Livestock, Dairy, and P…
- Subcommittee on Nutrition and Foreign A…
- Subcommittee on Oversight and Investiga…
- Subcommittee on Oversight, Investigatio…
- Subcommittee on Railroads, Pipelines, a…
- Subcommittee on Transportation and Mari…
- Subcommittee on Water Resources and Env…
- Subcommittee on Water, Wildlife and Fis…
- Transportation And Infrastructure
- Veterans' Affairs
- Ways And Means

H.R. 339
U.S. House•In House Committee
Summary
H.R. 339, the Broadband Resiliency and Flexible Investment Act, was introduced in the House on Jan 13, 2025 by Rep. Dan Crenshaw (R). It was referred to Energy And Commerce, and last saw action on Jan 13, 2025: Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Record
Text
H.R. 339 has no co-sponsors and has not gone to a roll call.
hb339/introduced-in-house.txt119 HR 339 IH: Broadband Resiliency and Flexible Investment ActU.S. House of Representatives2025-01-13text/xmlENPursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.I 119th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 339 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES January 13, 2025 Mr. Crenshaw introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce A BILLTo amend the Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012 to streamline the consideration by State and local governments of requests for modification of certain existing wireless facilities and telecommunications service facilities, and for other purposes.1.Short titleThis Act may be cited as the Broadband Resiliency and Flexible Investment Act .2.Requests for modification of certain existing wireless and telecommunications service facilities(a)In generalSection 6409(a) of the Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012 ( 47 U.S.C. 1455(a) ) is amended—(1)in paragraph (1), by striking a State or local government and all that follows and inserting the following:a State or local government or instrumentality thereof may not deny, and shall approve—(A)any eligible facilities request for a modification of an existing wireless tower, base station, or eligible support structure that does not substantially change the physical dimensions of such wireless tower, base station, or eligible support structure; and(B)any eligible telecommunications facilities request for a modification of an existing telecommunications service facility in or on eligible support infrastructure that does not substantially change the physical dimensions of such facility.;(2)by amending paragraph (2) to read as follows:(2)Timeframe(A)Deemed approvalIf a State or local government or instrumentality thereof does not, before or on the date that is 60 days after the date on which a requesting party submits to the government or instrumentality a request as an eligible facilities request or an eligible telecommunications facilities request (as the case may be), approve the request or make the determination and provide the written notice described in subparagraph (B) with respect to the request, the request is deemed approved on the day after the date that is 60 days after the date on which the requesting party submits the request.(B)Determination request is not an eligible request(i)Determination describedThe determination described in this subparagraph is a determination by a State or local government or instrumentality thereof that a request described in subparagraph (A) is not an eligible facilities request or an eligible telecommunications facilities request (as the case may be).(ii)Written notice describedThe written notice described in this subparagraph is a written notice of the determination described in clause (i) provided by the government or instrumentality to the requesting party that clearly describes the reasons why the request is not an eligible facilities request or an eligible telecommunications facilities request (as the case may be) and includes a citation to a specific provision of this subsection or the regulations promulgated under this subsection relied upon for the determination.(C)Tolling due to incompleteness(i)Initial request incompleteIf, not later than 30 days after the date on which a requesting party submits to a State or local government or instrumentality thereof a request described in subparagraph (A), the government or instrumentality provides to the requesting party a written notice described in clause (iii) with respect to the request, the 60-day timeframe under subparagraph (A) is tolled until the date on which the requesting party submits to the government or instrumentality a supplemental submission in response to the notice.(ii)Supplemental submission incompleteIf, not later than 10 days after the date on which a requesting party submits to a State or local government or instrumentality thereof a supplemental submission in response to a written notice under clause (i) with respect to a request described in subparagraph (A) or a written notice under this clause with respect to a subsequent supplemental submission, the government or instrumentality provides to the requesting party a written notice described in clause (iii) with respect to the supplemental submission, the 60-day timeframe under subparagraph (A) is further tolled until the date on which the requesting party submits to the government or instrumentality a subsequent supplemental submission in response to the notice.(iii)Written notice describedThe written notice described in this clause is, with respect to a request described in subparagraph (A) or a supplemental submission described in clause (i) or (ii) submitted to a State or local government or instrumentality thereof by a requesting party, a written notice from the government or instrumentality to the requesting party—(I)stating that all of the information (including any form or other document) required by the government or instrumentality to be submitted for the request to be considered complete has not been submitted;(II)identifying the information described in subclause (I) that was not submitted; and(III)including a citation to a specific provision of a publicly available rule, regulation, or standard issued by the government or instrumentality requiring that such information be submitted with such a request.(iv)Limitation(I)Initial written noticeIf a written notice provided by a State or local government or instrumentality thereof to a requesting party under clause (i) with respect to a request described in subparagraph (A) identifies as not having been submitted any information that the government or instrumentality is prohibited by paragraph (5) from requiring to be submitted, such notice shall be treated as not having been provided to the requesting party.(II)Subsequent written noticeIf a written notice provided by a State or local government or instrumentality thereof to a requesting party under clause (ii) with respect to a supplemental submission identifies as not having been submitted any information that was not identified as not having been submitted in the prior written notice under clause (i) or (ii) in response to which the supplemental submission was submitted, the subsequent written notice shall be treated as not having been provided to the requesting party.(D)Tolling by mutual agreementIn addition to any tolling under subparagraph (C), the 60-day timeframe under subparagraph (A) may be tolled by mutual agreement between the State or local government or instrumentality thereof and the requesting party.;(3)in paragraph (3), by striking paragraph (1) and inserting this subsection ; and(4)by adding at the end the following:(4)When request considered submitted(A)In generalFor the purposes of this subsection, a request described in paragraph (2)(A) shall be considered submitted on the date on which the requesting party takes the first procedural step within the control of the requesting party—(i)to submit such request in accordance with the procedures established by the government or instrumentality for the review and approval of such a request; or(ii)in the case of a government or instrumentality that has not established specific procedures for the review and approval of such a request, to submit to the government or instrumentality the type of filing that is typically required to initiate a standard review for a similar facility or structure.(B)No pre-application requirementsA State or local government or instrumentality thereof may not require a requesting party to undertake any process, meeting, or other step prior to or as a prerequisite to a request being considered submitted.(5)Limitation on required documentationA State or local government or instrumentality thereof may require a requesting party submitting a request as an eligible facilities request or an eligible telecommunications facilities request to submit information (including a form or other document) with such request only to the extent that such information is reasonably related to determining whether such request is an eligible facilities request or an eligible telecommunications facilities request (as the case may be) and is identified in a publicly available rule, regulation, or standard issued by the government or instrumentality requiring that such information be submitted with such a request. A State or local government or instrumentality thereof may not require a requesting party to submit any other documentation or information with such a request.(6)Enforcement(A)In generalA requesting party may bring an action in any district court of the United States to enforce the provisions of this subsection.(B)Expedited reviewA district court of the United States shall consider an action under subparagraph (A) on an expedited basis.(7)DefinitionsIn this subsection:(A)Eligible facilities requestThe term eligible facilities request means any request for a modification of an existing wireless tower, base station, or eligible support structure that does not substantially change the physical dimensions of such wireless tower, base station, or eligible support structure and that involves—(i)collocation of new transmission equipment;(ii)removal of transmission equipment;(iii)replacement of transmission equipment; or(iv)placement, construction, or modification of equipment that—(I)improves the resiliency of the wireless tower, base station, or eligible support structure; and(II)provides a direct benefit to public safety, such as—(aa)providing backup power for the wireless tower, base station, or eligible support structure;(bb)hardening the wireless tower, base station, or eligible support structure; or(cc)providing more reliable connection capability using the wireless tower, base station, or eligible support structure.(B)Eligible support infrastructureThe term eligible support infrastructure means infrastructure that supports or houses a telecommunications service facility at the time when an eligible telecommunications facilities request for a modification of such facility is submitted to a State or local government or instrumentality thereof.(C)Eligible support structureThe term eligible support structure means a structure that, at the time when an eligible facilities request for a modification of such structure is submitted to a State or local government or instrumentality thereof, supports or could support transmission equipment.(D)Eligible telecommunications facilities requestThe term eligible telecommunications facilities request means any request for a modification of an existing telecommunications service facility in or on eligible support infrastructure that does not substantially change the physical dimensions of such facility and that involves—(i)collocation of new telecommunications service facility equipment;(ii)removal of telecommunications service facility equipment; or(iii)replacement of telecommunications service facility equipment.(E)Telecommunications service facilityThe term telecommunications service facility —(i)means a facility that is designed or used to provide or facilitate the provision of any interstate or intrastate telecommunications service; and(ii)includes a facility described in clause (i) that is used to provide other services.(F)Transmission equipmentThe term transmission equipment has the meaning given such term in section 1.6100(b)(8) of title 47, Code of Federal Regulations (as in effect on the date of the enactment of this paragraph)..(b)ImplementationNot later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Federal Communications Commission shall issue final rules to implement the amendments made by subsection (a).(c)ApplicabilityThe amendments made by subsection (a) shall apply with respect to any eligible facilities request or eligible telecommunications facilities request described in paragraph (1) of section 6409(a) of the Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012 ( 47 U.S.C. 1455(a) ) that is submitted (as determined under paragraph (4) of such section, as added by subsection (a)) by a requesting party on or after the date of the enactment of this Act.
Tracker
The tracker indicates the progress of this legislation as it moves through the legislative process.
- Introduced2025-01-13
- Passed House
- Passed Senate
- Conference
- To President
- Became Law
CRS Summary
The summaries are the Congressional Research Service’s, one per stage. Read them in full.
Introduced in House Jan 13, 2025
hb339/introduced-in-house.mdShown Here:
Introduced in House (01/13/2025)
Sponsors
Rep. Dan Crenshaw (R) sponsors H.R. 339 alone.
Committees
H.R. 339 went before 1 committee: Energy and Commerce.
Actions
H.R. 339 has taken 2 actions since Jan 13, 2025.
| Chamber | Action | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Jan 13, 2025 | House | Introduced in House | ||
Jan 13, 2025 | House | Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.Energy and Commerce Committee |
Votes
H.R. 339 has not gone to a roll call.
Related bills
1 bill is related to H.R. 339.
Titles
H.R. 339 goes by 3 titles, 1 of them short titles.
- Broadband Resiliency and Flexible Investment Act — Display Title
- Broadband Resiliency and Flexible Investment Act — Short Title(s) as Introduced
- To amend the Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012 to streamline the consideration by State and local governments of requests for modification of certain existing wireless facilities and telecommunications service facilities, and for other purposes. — Official Title as Introduced
Lobbying
5 clients hired 5 firms and 22 registered lobbyists who named H.R. 339 in 15 quarterly filings, 2025 to 2026. Reported under the Lobbying Disclosure Act; a filing’s income covers everything its registrant worked that quarter, so the amounts below are the filings’, not this bill’s.
Filed under Telecommunications, Taxation/Internal Revenue Code, Real Estate/Land Use/Conservation, Urban Development/Municipalities, Communications/Broadcasting/Radio/TV, Consumer Issues/Safety/Products, Defense, Disaster Planning/Emergencies.
Clients
Who paid to be heard, by how many filings named the bill.
| Client | Business | State | Firms | Filings | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TELECOMMUNITY | — | District of Columbia | 1 | 6 | — |
| CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS INC | — | Connecticut | 1 | 4 | — |
| COMPETITIVE CARRIERS ASSOCIATION | — | District of Columbia | 1 | 3 | — |
| CTIA: THE WIRELESS ASSOCIATION | Wireless Telecommunications Association | District of Columbia | 1 | 1 | $50K |
| CTIA-THE WIRELESS ASSOCIATION | — | District of Columbia | 1 | 1 | — |
Firms
Registrants who filed on the bill, by filings.
| Registrant | Clients | Filings | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP | 1 | 6 | — |
| CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. | 1 | 4 | — |
| COMPETITIVE CARRIERS ASSOCIATION | 1 | 3 | — |
| CTIA-THE WIRELESS ASSOCIATION | 1 | 1 | — |
| MERCURY STRATEGIES, LLC | 1 | 1 | $50K |
Lobbyists
Named on the filings that cite the bill. The 20 named most often, of 22.
| Lobbyist | Firms | Clients | Filings |
|---|---|---|---|
| GERARD LEDERER | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| ASHLEY HAYES | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| CATHERINE BOHIGIAN | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| PATRICK WILLIAMS | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| PAUL CANCIENNE | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| RACHEL WELCH | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| SAUL HERNANDEZ | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| VIRGINIA ZIGRAS | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| EMERALD LITKE-SMITH | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| MARIBETH COLLINS | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| TIMOTHY DONOVAN | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| ANDREW FIELDS | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| ANNE-MARIE KELLEY | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| CHLOE RODRIGUEZ | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| CHRIS MCNAMEE | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| JAMES GREEN | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| JOHN HOWES | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| KELLY COLE | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| SARAH VERSAGGI | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| SCOTT STOCKWELL | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Filings
The documents themselves, on the Senate’s Lobbying Disclosure site, largest reported first.
| Client | Registrant | Period | Reported | Document |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CTIA-THE WIRELESS ASSOCIATION | CTIA-THE WIRELESS ASSOCIATION | 2025 fourth_quarter | $5.5M | 4th Quarter - Report |
| CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS INC | CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. | 2025 third_quarter | $2.6M | 3rd Quarter - Report |
| CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS INC | CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. | 2025 fourth_quarter | $2.6M | 4th Quarter - Report |
| CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS INC | CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. | 2026 first_quarter | $2.5M | 1st Quarter - Report |
| CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS INC | CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. | 2026 second_quarter | $2.5M | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| COMPETITIVE CARRIERS ASSOCIATION | COMPETITIVE CARRIERS ASSOCIATION | 2026 second_quarter | $170K | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| COMPETITIVE CARRIERS ASSOCIATION | COMPETITIVE CARRIERS ASSOCIATION | 2026 first_quarter | $150K | 1st Quarter - Report |
| COMPETITIVE CARRIERS ASSOCIATION | COMPETITIVE CARRIERS ASSOCIATION | 2025 fourth_quarter | $150K | 4th Quarter - Report |
| CTIA: THE WIRELESS ASSOCIATION | MERCURY STRATEGIES, LLC | 2025 fourth_quarter | $50K | 4th Quarter - Report |
| TELECOMMUNITY | BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP | 2026 second_quarter | — | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| TELECOMMUNITY | BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP | 2026 first_quarter | — | 1st Quarter - Report |
| TELECOMMUNITY | BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP | 2025 fourth_quarter | — | 4th Quarter - Report |
| TELECOMMUNITY | BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP | 2025 third_quarter | — | 3rd Quarter - Report |
| TELECOMMUNITY | BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP | 2025 second_quarter | — | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| TELECOMMUNITY | BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP | 2025 first_quarter | — | 1st Quarter - Report |
Classification
The Congressional Research Service files H.R. 339 under Science, Technology, Communications, one of its 31 policy areas.
CRS Subjects
CRS assigns every bill one policy area from its 31; H.R. 339’s is Science, Technology, Communications.
hr339/policy-areas.txtSource: congress.gov · legiscan.com