Search

Search bills, members, committees and pages...

H.R. 242

U.S. HouseIn House Committee

Summary

H.R. 242, the MANAGER Act, was introduced in the House on Jan 9, 2025 by Rep. Pete Sessions (R). It was referred to Oversight And Government Reform, and last saw action on Jan 9, 2025: Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.


Record

Text

H.R. 242 has no co-sponsors and has not gone to a roll call.

hb242/introduced-in-house.txt
108 HR 242 IH: Manager Attitudes and Notions According to Government Employee Responses Act
U.S. House of Representatives
2025-01-09
text/xml
EN
Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.
I 119th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 242 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES January 9, 2025 Mr. Sessions introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform A BILL
To require annual surveys of Federal employee managers, and for other purposes.
1.
Short title
This Act may be cited as the Manager Attitudes and Notions According to Government Employee Responses Act or the MANAGER Act .
2.
Federal employee manager surveys
(a)
In general
Section 1128 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2004 ( Public Law 108–136 ; 5 U.S.C. 7101 note) is amended—
(1)
by redesignating subsections (b), (c), and (d) as subsections (c), (d), and (e), respectively;
(2)
by inserting after subsection (a) the following:
(b)
Managers
(1)
In general
Each agency shall conduct an annual survey of its managers that shall, in addition to the topics covered by the survey under subsection (a), include the following questions:
(A)
I have confidence my agency leadership will support me if I try to discipline an employee.
(B)
I have confidence in the current system to discipline employees.
(C)
I feel supported as a manager.
(D)
I have adequate training regarding how to discipline employees.
(E)
I have adequate time to observe new employees and attempt to correct deficiencies before their probationary period expires.
(F)
I have opted not to attempt to discipline an employee over the past year because I have no confidence in the system.
(G)
My input is sought regarding labor negotiations that will impact my work unit.
(H)
I would recommend that a colleague in my agency become a manager if given the option to do so.
(I)
The inability to discipline poor performers or otherwise bad employees hurts the morale of my work unit.
(J)
Good employees in my work unit have left because of the inability to discipline problematic employees.
(2)
Response options
Each survey under paragraph (1) shall include an option to provide narrative responses to each question required under such paragraph, in addition to any other quantitative or qualitative response options.
;
(3)
in subsections (c) and (d), as redesignated by paragraph (1) of this subsection, by striking subsection (a) each place it appears and inserting subsection (a) or (b) ; and
(4)
by amending subsection (e), as so redesignated, to read as follows:
(e)
Definitions
In this section—
(1)
the term agency means an Executive agency (as that term is defined in section 105 of title 5, United States Code); and
(2)
the term Federal manager means a Federal employee who—
(A)
has obtained the grade of GS–13 of the General Schedule or higher; and
(B)
is a supervisor or management official (as those terms are defined in section 7103 of such title 5).
.
(b)
Requirement To update surveys
Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Office of Personnel Management shall update the regulations required under subsection (c) of such section 1128, as so redesignated, in order to implement the amendments made by this Act.

Tracker

The tracker indicates the progress of this legislation as it moves through the legislative process.

  1. Introduced2025-01-09
  2. Passed House
  3. Passed Senate
  4. Conference
  5. To President
  6. Became Law

CRS Summary

The summaries are the Congressional Research Service’s, one per stage. Read them in full.

Introduced in House Jan 9, 2025

hb242/introduced-in-house.md

Shown Here:
Introduced in House (01/09/2025)

Sponsors

Rep. Pete Sessions (R) sponsors H.R. 242 alone.

Committees

H.R. 242 went before 1 committee: Oversight and Government Reform.

Oversight and Government Reform
Oversight and Government Reform
Referred To · Jan 9, 2025 · 696 Bills

Actions

H.R. 242 has taken 2 actions since Jan 9, 2025.

ChamberAction
Jan 9, 2025
House
Introduced in House
Jan 9, 2025
House
Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.Oversight and Government Reform Committee

Votes

H.R. 242 has not gone to a roll call.

Titles

H.R. 242 goes by 4 titles, 2 of them short titles.

  • MANAGER Act — Display Title
  • MANAGER Act — Short Title(s) as Introduced
  • Manager Attitudes and Notions According to Government Employee Responses Act — Short Title(s) as Introduced
  • To require annual surveys of Federal employee managers, and for other purposes. — Official Title as Introduced

Lobbying

4 clients hired 3 firms and 11 registered lobbyists who named H.R. 242 in 16 quarterly filings, 2025 to 2026. Reported under the Lobbying Disclosure Act; a filing’s income covers everything its registrant worked that quarter, so the amounts below are the filings’, not this bill’s.

Filed under Government Issues, Budget/Appropriations, Health Issues, Labor Issues/Antitrust/Workplace.

Clients

Who paid to be heard, by how many filings named the bill.

ClientBusinessStateFirmsFilingsReported
FEDERAL MANAGERS ASSOCIATIONVirginia16
NATIONAL TREASURY EMPLOYEES UNIONDistrict of Columbia16
PROFESSIONAL MANAGERS ASSOCIATIONProfessional organization representing federal managers and supervisorsDistrict of Columbia12$20K
SENIOR EXECUTIVES ASSOCIATIONProfessional organization representing federal career Senior ExecutivesDistrict of Columbia12$20K

Firms

Registrants who filed on the bill, by filings.

Lobbyists

Named on the filings that cite the bill.

Filings

The documents themselves, on the Senate’s Lobbying Disclosure site, largest reported first.

ClientRegistrantPeriodReportedDocument
NATIONAL TREASURY EMPLOYEES UNIONNATIONAL TREASURY EMPLOYEES UNION2025 fourth_quarter$350K4th Quarter - Report
NATIONAL TREASURY EMPLOYEES UNIONNATIONAL TREASURY EMPLOYEES UNION2025 second_quarter$350K2nd Quarter - Report
NATIONAL TREASURY EMPLOYEES UNIONNATIONAL TREASURY EMPLOYEES UNION2026 second_quarter$340K2nd Quarter - Report
NATIONAL TREASURY EMPLOYEES UNIONNATIONAL TREASURY EMPLOYEES UNION2026 first_quarter$310K1st Quarter - Report
NATIONAL TREASURY EMPLOYEES UNIONNATIONAL TREASURY EMPLOYEES UNION2025 third_quarter$300K3rd Quarter - Report
NATIONAL TREASURY EMPLOYEES UNIONNATIONAL TREASURY EMPLOYEES UNION2025 first_quarter$300K1st Quarter - Report
PROFESSIONAL MANAGERS ASSOCIATIONSHAW, BRANSFORD & ROTH, P.C. (FORMERLY SHAW, BRANSFORD, VEILLEUX & ROTH, P.C.)2025 second_quarter$10K2nd Quarter - Report
SENIOR EXECUTIVES ASSOCIATIONSHAW, BRANSFORD & ROTH, P.C. (FORMERLY SHAW, BRANSFORD, VEILLEUX & ROTH, P.C.)2025 second_quarter$10K2nd Quarter - Report
PROFESSIONAL MANAGERS ASSOCIATIONSHAW, BRANSFORD & ROTH, P.C. (FORMERLY SHAW, BRANSFORD, VEILLEUX & ROTH, P.C.)2025 first_quarter$10K1st Quarter - Report
SENIOR EXECUTIVES ASSOCIATIONSHAW, BRANSFORD & ROTH, P.C. (FORMERLY SHAW, BRANSFORD, VEILLEUX & ROTH, P.C.)2025 first_quarter$10K1st Quarter - Report
FEDERAL MANAGERS ASSOCIATIONFEDERAL MANAGERS ASSOCIATION2026 second_quarter2nd Quarter - Report
FEDERAL MANAGERS ASSOCIATIONFEDERAL MANAGERS ASSOCIATION2026 first_quarter1st Quarter - Report
FEDERAL MANAGERS ASSOCIATIONFEDERAL MANAGERS ASSOCIATION2025 fourth_quarter4th Quarter - Report
FEDERAL MANAGERS ASSOCIATIONFEDERAL MANAGERS ASSOCIATION2025 third_quarter3rd Quarter - Report
FEDERAL MANAGERS ASSOCIATIONFEDERAL MANAGERS ASSOCIATION2025 second_quarter2nd Quarter - Report
FEDERAL MANAGERS ASSOCIATIONFEDERAL MANAGERS ASSOCIATION2025 first_quarter1st Quarter - Amendme…

Classification

The Congressional Research Service files H.R. 242 under Government Operations and Politics, one of its 31 policy areas, and gives it 1 legislative subject.

CRS Subjects

CRS assigns every bill one policy area from its 31; H.R. 242’s is Government Operations and Politics.

hr242/policy-areas.txt
Government Operations and PoliticsAgriculture and FoodAnimalsArmed Forces and National SecurityArts, Culture, ReligionCivil Rights and Liberties, Minority IssuesCommerceCongressCrime and Law EnforcementEconomics and Public FinanceEducationEmergency ManagementEnergyEnvironmental ProtectionFamiliesFinance and Financial SectorForeign Trade and International FinanceHealthHousing and Community DevelopmentImmigrationInternational AffairsLabor and EmploymentLawNative AmericansPublic Lands and Natural ResourcesScience, Technology, CommunicationsSocial WelfareSports and RecreationTaxationTransportation and Public WorksWater Resources Development

Legislative Subjects

H.R. 242 carries 1 of CRS’s legislative subject: Government employee pay, benefits, personnel management.

hr242/subjects.txt
Government employee pay, benefits, personnel management

Source: congress.gov · legiscan.com