- H.R. 10171August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10156August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10172August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10160August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10181August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10176August 27, 2026
- H.Res. 1496August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10164August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10170August 27, 2026
- H.Res. 1494August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10163August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10157August 27, 2026
- Administration
- Agriculture
- Agriculture, Nutrition, And Forestry
- Appropriations
- Armed Services
- Banking, Housing, And Urban Affairs
- Budget
- Commerce, Science, And Transportation
- Education and Workforce
- Energy And Commerce
- Energy And Natural Resources
- Environment And Public Works
- Ethics
- Finance
- Financial Services
- Foreign Affairs
- Foreign Relations
- Health, Education, Labor, And Pensions
- Homeland Security
- Homeland Security And Governmental Affa…
- Indian Affairs
- Indian and Insular Affairs
- Intelligence
- Judiciary
- Natural Resources
- Oversight And Government Reform
- Permanent Select Intelligence
- Rules
- Rules And Administration
- Science, Space, And Technology
- Select Intelligence
- Small Business
- Small Business And Entrepreneurship
- Subcommittee on Aviation
- Subcommittee on Border Security and Enf…
- Subcommittee on Coast Guard and Maritim…
- Subcommittee on Commodity Markets, Digi…
- Subcommittee on Conservation, Research,…
- Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and In…
- Subcommittee on Cybersecurity and Infra…
- Subcommittee on Disability Assistance a…
- Subcommittee on Economic Development, P…
- Subcommittee on Economic Opportunity
- Subcommittee on Emergency Management an…
- Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Reso…
- Subcommittee on Federal Lands
- Subcommittee on Forestry and Horticultu…
- Subcommittee on General Farm Commoditie…
- Subcommittee on Health
- Subcommittee on Highways and Transit
- Subcommittee on Livestock, Dairy, and P…
- Subcommittee on Nutrition and Foreign A…
- Subcommittee on Oversight and Investiga…
- Subcommittee on Oversight, Investigatio…
- Subcommittee on Railroads, Pipelines, a…
- Subcommittee on Transportation and Mari…
- Subcommittee on Water Resources and Env…
- Subcommittee on Water, Wildlife and Fis…
- Transportation And Infrastructure
- Veterans' Affairs
- Ways And Means

H.R. 67
U.S. House•In House Committee
Summary
H.R. 67, “Modernizing Retrospective Regulatory Review”, was introduced in the House on Jan 3, 2025 by Rep. Andy Biggs (R) with 1 co-sponsor. It last saw action on May 21, 2025: Ordered to be Reported by the Yeas and Nays: 24 - 18.
Record
Text
H.R. 67 has 1 co-sponsor.
hb67/introduced-in-house.txt119 HR 67 IH: Modernizing Retrospective Regulatory ReviewU.S. House of Representatives2025-01-03text/xmlENPursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.I 119th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 67 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES January 3, 2025 Mr. Biggs of Arizona (for himself and Mr. Crane ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform A BILLTo improve retrospective reviews of Federal regulations, and for other purposes.1.Short titleThis Act may be cited as the Modernizing Retrospective Regulatory Review Act .2.Improving retrospective reviews of existing Federal regulations(a)Report on availability of existing regulations in machine-Readable format(1)In generalNot later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director of the Office of Management and Budget, acting through the Administrator and in consultation with the Director of GPO, the Archivist, and the Director of the Federal Register, shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees, a report on the progress of the Federal Government in making regulations of agencies available in machine-readable format.(2)Contents of reportThe report required by paragraph (1) shall include—(A)an assessment of whether regulations of agencies have been made available in a machine-readable format to the public; and(B)information regarding the recognition by the Administrative Committee of the Federal Register of the eCFR maintained by the Director of the Federal Register and the Director of GPO as an official legal edition of the Code of Federal Regulations.(b)Guidance on using technology To conduct retrospective reviews(1)In generalNot later than 18 months after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director of the Office of Management and Budget, acting through the Administrator, shall issue guidance on how the head of the agency can—(A)identify, procure, and use technology (including algorithmic tools and artificial intelligence) to more efficiently, cost-effectively, and accurately conduct any retrospective review of the existing regulations of the agency, including to more efficiently, cost-effectively, and accurately identify through any such review regulations of the agency that—(i)are obsolete, ineffective, insufficient, excessively burdensome, or redundant;(ii)should be improved;(iii)contain typographic errors;(iv)contain inaccurate cross-references; or(v)contradict or overlap with each other, or any standards of the agency; and(B)adequately train personnel of the agency on how to use such technology.(2)Development of guidanceIn developing the guidance required pursuant to paragraph (1), the Administrator shall take into account any assessment or information included in the report required by subsection (a).(c)Agency retrospective review planNot later than 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act, the head of each agency shall submit to the Administrator and the appropriate congressional committees a plan that—(1)includes a detailed strategy for implementing the guidance issued pursuant to subsection (b) with respect to the regulations of the agency;(2)identifies any regulation of the agency, or categories of regulations of the agency, that the head of the agency—(A)is required by law to review after the applicable regulation is issued; or(B)determines would benefit from being reviewed after the regulation is issued; and(3)includes any additional information, data, or ex-post analysis determined necessary or useful by the head of the agency.(d)Agency implementationNot later than 180 days after the date on which the head of an agency submits the plan required by subsection (c), the head of the agency shall implement the strategy included in such plan with respect to any retrospective review of an existing regulation of the agency.(e)DefinitionsIn this section:(1)Administrative Committee of the Federal RegisterThe term Administrative Committee of the Federal Register means the Committee established under section 1506 of title 44, United States Code.(2)AdministratorThe term Administrator means the Administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs.(3)AgencyThe term agency has the meaning given that term in section 3502 of title 44, United States Code.(4)Appropriate congressional committeesThe term appropriate congressional committees means—(A)the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform of the House of Representatives; and(B)the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate.(5)Director of GPOThe term Director of GPO means the Director of the Government Publishing Office.(6)Machine-readableThe term machine-readable has the meaning given the term in section 3502 of title 44, United States Code.(7)Retrospective review of an existing regulation of the agencyThe term retrospective review of an existing regulation of the agency means a review of a regulation of the agency conducted after the regulation has been issued, including any such review required by law or determined appropriate by the head of the agency.
Tracker
The tracker indicates the progress of this legislation as it moves through the legislative process.
- Introduced2025-01-03
- Passed House
- Passed Senate
- Conference
- To President
- Became Law
CRS Summary
The summaries are the Congressional Research Service’s, one per stage. Read them in full.
Introduced in House Jan 3, 2025
hb67/introduced-in-house.mdShown Here:
Introduced in House (01/03/2025)
Sponsors
Rep. Andy Biggs (R) sponsors H.R. 67, and 1 member has co-sponsored it from the day it was introduced.
Committees
H.R. 67 went before 1 committee: Oversight and Government Reform.
Actions
H.R. 67 has taken 4 actions since Jan 3, 2025, the latest on May 21, 2025.
| Chamber | Action | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
May 21, 2025 | House | Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session HeldOversight and Government Reform Committee | ||
May 21, 2025 | House | Ordered to be Reported by the Yeas and Nays: 24 - 18.Oversight and Government Reform Committee | ||
Jan 3, 2025 | House | Introduced in House | ||
Jan 3, 2025 | House | Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.Oversight and Government Reform Committee |
Votes
H.R. 67 has not gone to a roll call.
Related bills
1 bill is related to H.R. 67.
Titles
H.R. 67 goes by 3 titles, 1 of them short titles.
- Modernizing Retrospective Regulatory Review — Display Title
- Modernizing Retrospective Regulatory Review — Short Title(s) as Introduced
- To improve retrospective reviews of Federal regulations, and for other purposes. — Official Title as Introduced
Cost estimate
The Congressional Budget Office has filed 1 estimate for H.R. 67, the latest on Jan 26, 2026.
- H.R. 67, Modernizing Retrospective Regulatory Review Act of 2025 — 2026-01-26As ordered reported by the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform on May 21, 2025
Lobbying
2 clients hired 2 firms and 14 registered lobbyists who named H.R. 67 in 4 quarterly filings, 2025. Reported under the Lobbying Disclosure Act; a filing’s income covers everything its registrant worked that quarter, so the amounts below are the filings’, not this bill’s.
Filed under Government Issues, Health Issues, Banking, Budget/Appropriations, Civil Rights/Civil Liberties, Consumer Issues/Safety/Products, Pharmacy, Taxation/Internal Revenue Code.
Clients
Who paid to be heard, by how many filings named the bill.
| Client | Business | State | Firms | Filings | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PUBLIC CITIZEN | — | District of Columbia | 1 | 3 | — |
| HERITAGE ACTION FOR AMERICA | — | District of Columbia | 1 | 1 | — |
Firms
Registrants who filed on the bill, by filings.
| Registrant | Clients | Filings | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| PUBLIC CITIZEN | 1 | 3 | — |
| HERITAGE ACTION FOR AMERICA | 1 | 1 | — |
Lobbyists
Named on the filings that cite the bill.
| Lobbyist | Firms | Clients | Filings |
|---|---|---|---|
| BARTLETT NAYLOR | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| CRAIG HOLMAN | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| EAGAN KEMP | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| ELIZABETH SKERRY | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| JONATHAN GOLINGER | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| MARTHA PEREZ-PEDEMONTI | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| STEVEN KNIEVEL | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| SUSAN HARLEY | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| JOSHUA BRANCH | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| KATHERINE TRACY | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| DANIEL WEST | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| ELIZABETH BEAVERS | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| JULEY FULCHER | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| RYAN WALKER | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Filings
The documents themselves, on the Senate’s Lobbying Disclosure site, largest reported first.
| Client | Registrant | Period | Reported | Document |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HERITAGE ACTION FOR AMERICA | HERITAGE ACTION FOR AMERICA | 2025 second_quarter | $130K | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| PUBLIC CITIZEN | PUBLIC CITIZEN | 2025 third_quarter | $99.8K | 3rd Quarter - Report |
| PUBLIC CITIZEN | PUBLIC CITIZEN | 2025 second_quarter | $98.8K | 2nd Quarter - Amendme… |
| PUBLIC CITIZEN | PUBLIC CITIZEN | 2025 fourth_quarter | $73K | 4th Quarter - Report |
Classification
The Congressional Research Service files H.R. 67 under Government Operations and Politics, one of its 31 policy areas, and gives it 4 legislative subjects.
CRS Subjects
CRS assigns every bill one policy area from its 31; H.R. 67’s is Government Operations and Politics.
hr67/policy-areas.txtLegislative Subjects
H.R. 67 carries 4 of CRS’s legislative subjects, from Administrative law and regulatory procedures to Government information and archives.
hr67/subjects.txtSource: congress.gov · legiscan.com
