Search

Search bills, members, committees and pages...

H.R. 65

U.S. HouseIn House Committee

Summary

H.R. 65, the Armed Forces Endangered Species Exemption Act, was introduced in the House on Jan 3, 2025 by Rep. Andy Biggs (R) with 1 co-sponsor. It was referred to Natural Resources, and last saw action on Jan 3, 2025: Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.


Record

Text

H.R. 65 has 1 co-sponsor.

hb65/introduced-in-house.txt
119 HR 65 IH: Armed Forces Endangered Species Exemption Act
U.S. House of Representatives
2025-01-03
text/xml
EN
Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.
I 119th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 65 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES January 3, 2025 Mr. Biggs of Arizona (for himself and Mr. Gosar ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources A BILL
To amend the Endangered Species Act of 1973 to further restrict the Secretary of the Interior from designating certain lands used for national defense-related purposes as critical habitat for any species under that Act and to broaden exclusions and exemptions from that Act for such defense-related purposes.
1.
Short title
This Act may be cited as the Armed Forces Endangered Species Exemption Act .
2.
Exclusion of military institutions as critical habitat
Section 4(a)(3)(B) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 ( 16 U.S.C. 1533(a)(3)(B) ) is amended to read as follows:
(i)
The Secretary shall not designate as critical habitat—
(I)
any military installation or a State-owned National Guard installation, or any portion thereof, as such terms are defined in section 100 of the Sikes Act ( 16 U.S.C. 670 ); or
(II)
any other lands, waters, or geographical area not described in clause (i) that is otherwise designated for use by the Secretary of Defense including by any contractor of the Department of Defense, if the Secretary of Defense determines in writing and submitted to the Secretary of the Interior that such area is necessary for military training, weapons testing, or any other reason determined appropriate by such Secretary of Defense.
(ii)
The Secretary of Defense shall not be required to consult with the Secretary of the Interior, under section 7(a)(2) of this Act with respect to agency action, regardless of whether the area described in clause (i) is subject to an integrated natural resources management plan prepared under section 101 of the Sikes Act ( 16 U.S.C. 670a ).
.
3.
Additional exclusions and exemptions from Endangered Species Act of 1973 for defense-related operations
Section 10 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 ( 16 U.S.C. 1539 ) is amended by adding at the end the following:
(k)
Exclusion for national defense-Related operations
(1)
Exclusions
The prohibitions under section 9 shall not apply with respect to—
(A)
the taking of any endangered species or threatened species, or the importation or exportation of any such species taken as prohibited by such section, by military personnel engaged in a national defense-related operation;
(B)
damaging or destroying any threatened or endangered species, or removing, cutting, digging up, damaging, or destroying any such species, by military personnel engaged in a national defense-related operation; or
(C)
an injury to or mortality of a threatened or endangered species that results from, but is not the purpose of, a national defense-related operation,
regardless of whether the operation is conducted on a military installation or other area described in section 4(a)(3)(B)(i).
(2)
Definitions
For the purposes of this subsection—
(A)
the term national defense-related operation means—
(i)
research, development, testing, and evaluation of military munitions, other ordnance, and weapons systems;
(ii)
the training of members of the Armed Forces in the use and handling of military munitions, other ordnance, and weapons systems;
(iii)
general training and military preparedness; or
(iv)
any action or duty that the Secretary of Defense deems necessary to support the Department of Defense in its mission; and
(B)
the term military personnel means—
(i)
a member of the Armed Forces; and
(ii)
a civilian employee or contractor (including a subcontractor at any tier) of the—
(I)
Department of Defense (including a nonappropriated fund instrumentality of the Department); or
(II)
any other Federal agency, or any provisional authority, to the extent such employment relates to supporting the mission of the Department of Defense overseas.
.

Tracker

The tracker indicates the progress of this legislation as it moves through the legislative process.

  1. Introduced2025-01-03
  2. Passed House
  3. Passed Senate
  4. Conference
  5. To President
  6. Became Law

CRS Summary

The summaries are the Congressional Research Service’s, one per stage. Read them in full.

Introduced in House Jan 3, 2025

hb65/introduced-in-house.md

Shown Here:
Introduced in House (01/03/2025)

Sponsors

Rep. Andy Biggs (R) sponsors H.R. 65, and 1 member has co-sponsored it from the day it was introduced.

Committees

H.R. 65 went before 1 committee: Natural Resources.

Natural Resources
Natural Resources
Referred To · Jan 3, 2025 · 395 Bills

Actions

H.R. 65 has taken 2 actions since Jan 3, 2025.

ChamberAction
Jan 3, 2025
House
Introduced in House
Jan 3, 2025
House
Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.Natural Resources Committee

Votes

H.R. 65 has not gone to a roll call.

Titles

H.R. 65 goes by 3 titles, 1 of them short titles.

  • Armed Forces Endangered Species Exemption Act — Display Title
  • Armed Forces Endangered Species Exemption Act — Short Title(s) as Introduced
  • To amend the Endangered Species Act of 1973 to further restrict the Secretary of the Interior from designating certain lands used for national defense-related purposes as critical habitat for any species under that Act and to broaden exclusions and exemptions from that Act for such defense-related purposes. — Official Title as Introduced

Lobbying

2 clients hired 2 firms and 12 registered lobbyists who named H.R. 65 in 2 quarterly filings, 2025. Reported under the Lobbying Disclosure Act; a filing’s income covers everything its registrant worked that quarter, so the amounts below are the filings’, not this bill’s.

Filed under Animals, Budget/Appropriations, Natural Resources, Energy/Nuclear, Homeland Security, Immigration.

Clients

Who paid to be heard, by how many filings named the bill.

ClientBusinessStateFirmsFilingsReported
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITYArizona11
DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFEDistrict of Columbia11

Firms

Registrants who filed on the bill, by filings.

RegistrantClientsFilingsReported
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY11
DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE11

Lobbyists

Named on the filings that cite the bill.

Filings

The documents themselves, on the Senate’s Lobbying Disclosure site, largest reported first.

ClientRegistrantPeriodReportedDocument
DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFEDEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE2025 first_quarter$80K1st Quarter - Report
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITYCENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY2025 first_quarter$64.6K1st Quarter - Report

Classification

The Congressional Research Service files H.R. 65 under Environmental Protection, one of its 31 policy areas.

CRS Subjects

CRS assigns every bill one policy area from its 31; H.R. 65’s is Environmental Protection.

hr65/policy-areas.txt
Environmental ProtectionAgriculture and FoodAnimalsArmed Forces and National SecurityArts, Culture, ReligionCivil Rights and Liberties, Minority IssuesCommerceCongressCrime and Law EnforcementEconomics and Public FinanceEducationEmergency ManagementEnergyFamiliesFinance and Financial SectorForeign Trade and International FinanceGovernment Operations and PoliticsHealthHousing and Community DevelopmentImmigrationInternational AffairsLabor and EmploymentLawNative AmericansPublic Lands and Natural ResourcesScience, Technology, CommunicationsSocial WelfareSports and RecreationTaxationTransportation and Public WorksWater Resources Development

Source: congress.gov · legiscan.com